How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on
Definition
Let be a commutative ring, let be a group, let be a subgroup (Subgroup), and let be an -linear -module (An -linear action of on a left -module, and a -module over ).
The induced -linear -module is the set
where is the set of all functions (The set of all functions ).
Pointwise addition and scalar multiplication make an -module:
The left action of on this module is
This action is well defined on the displayed subset because
and each operator is -linear by the pointwise definitions. Thus is an -linear -module.
Remarks
-
The covariance condition is written on the right, so the values of an induced function are determined by one value on each left coset .
-
When is a field and is finite-dimensional, this construction is the induced representation of from the representation of on .
Depends on
Used by
- M-groups are solvable (Taketa) Corollary
- A solvable group that is not an M-group Counterexample
- Harish-Chandra induction and restriction for finite general linear groups Definition
- Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups Definition
- The free FI-module M(W) generated by an Sₘ-module Definition
- The induced character Ind_H^Gχ of a complex character Definition
- The principal series module for finite GLₙ Definition
- All finite dihedral groups are M-groups Example
- Finite transitive G-sets recover the stabilizer-induction classification Example
- Finite-group counting model for induction Example
- The outer product of S^(3,2) and S⁽²⁾ Example
- Trivial and one-dimensional monomial cases Example
- A coset basis makes a monomial representation monomial matrices Lemma
- Induction commutes with an external tensor factor Lemma
- Induction commutes with inflation along a normal subgroup Lemma
- Induction is invariant under conjugation of the subgroup and the representation Lemma
- Kernel of an induced representation is the intersection of the conjugates of the kernel of the inducing representation Lemma
- Monomiality lifts along a quotient Lemma
- Principal series endomorphisms as the chi-idempotent corner Lemma
- A left transversal identifies Ind_H^G W with a direct sum of [G:H] copies of W Proposition
- The function model of induction agrees with the tensor-product model k[G]⊗_k[H]W Remark
- Existence and uniqueness of cuspidal support Theorem
- Finite supersolvable groups are M-groups Theorem
- Inducing the trivial representation gives the permutation representation on G/H Theorem
- Induction is left adjoint to restriction for finite-group modules over a commutative ring Theorem
- Induction is transitive along subgroup chains Theorem
- Multiplicity-free complex Specht induction Theorem
- Outer induction and restriction make the symmetric-group character ring a graded Hopf algebra Theorem
- Outer induction makes the graded symmetric-group representation group a commutative graded ring Theorem
- Parabolic Mackey formula for finite GLₙ Theorem
- The outer Littlewood–Richardson rule Theorem
- Transitivity and parabolic independence of Harish-Chandra induction Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Definition 4.28 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Section 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)