How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induction is invariant under conjugation of the subgroup and the representation
Statement
Let be a finite group, , , and . Let be a finite-dimensional complex -module with character , and let be the conjugate -module with and character (Conjugate representations and conjugate characters on conjugate subgroups, Subgroup, A finite-dimensional representation over a field, and its degree). Then
is an isomorphism of complex -modules with inverse (The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on ). In particular, in (The induced character of a complex character, Virtual characters and the character ring of a finite group). No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , a subgroup , an element , and a finite-dimensional complex -module with character .
Induced functions satisfy and the left action is (The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on ).
The conjugate module is a representation of with ; its character satisfies (Conjugate representations and conjugate characters on conjugate subgroups).
The induced character of a finite-dimensional representation is the character of the induced module (The induced character of a complex character).
is a subgroup of (Subgroup).
The character ring is the integral span of the honest complex characters (Virtual characters and the character ring of a finite group).
Proof
For , covariance gives , where the last action is that of by [F2]. Thus is -covariant and belongs to .
Define . For , by -covariance and [F2]. Hence .
For , , so is -equivariant. It is complex-linear by the pointwise module operations.
For , , so is -equivariant. It is complex-linear by the pointwise operations.
Substitution gives and for every . Thus and are inverse -module isomorphisms.
The induced modules in step 3.1 are isomorphic, so their characters are equal by [F3]. Both honest characters lie in by [F5], giving there. The formulas use no choice principle.
Depends on
- The induced $R$-linear $G$-module $\operatorname{Ind}_H^G W$ as $H$-covariant functions on $G$
- Conjugate representations and conjugate characters on conjugate subgroups
- The induced character $\operatorname{Ind}_H^G\chi$ of a complex character
- Subgroup
- A finite-dimensional representation $\rho:G\to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ over a field, and its degree
- Virtual characters and the character ring $R(G)$ of a finite group
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (complete author-hosted textbook, 294 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)