How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The set of all functions
Definition
Let and be sets. By For sets and the collection of all functions is a set, being a subset of the functions (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain) form a set; it is written
Thus holds if and only if .
Remarks
-
The notation collides with exponentiation, and the collision is deliberate. is the same symbol the library already uses for a space of functions in The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case , where is the set of functions carrying a vector-space structure; the underlying set there is the one defined here. Some set-theory texts write instead, reserving for ordinal and cardinal exponentiation. This library keeps for the function set, and Ordinal and cardinal are different operations that share one notation is where the arithmetic exponentiations are distinguished from one another.
-
Degenerate cases. has exactly one element, the empty function, for every , since a function with empty domain has no elements at all. is empty whenever is nonempty, since a function with domain must take a value at each point of , and again has the empty function as its only element.
Depends on
Used by
- A reflexive coequalizer of sets not preserved by Set(ℕ,-) Counterexample
- The functor D(X)=X⊔ X on Set is not covariantly representable Counterexample
- Baire sequence space ℕ^ℕ and its cylinder topology Definition
- Computation alphabets, words, the empty word, and Σ^* Definition
- Initial tapes and machine-relative halting configurations Definition
- The induced R-linear G-module Ind_H^G W as H-covariant functions on G Definition
- The power and the copower of an object by a set Definition
- Trees and their bodies Definition
- Cantor diagonal construction misses every prescribed list of binary sequences Example
- Evaluation of functions is dinatural in its argument set Example
- Frobenius reciprocity for group representations without tensor products Example
- Powers and copowers of a set by a set Example
- The distributive and exponential laws of sets are natural isomorphisms Example
- The free word monoid on X represents M mapstoSet(X,U(M)) Example
- The function set B^A represents X mapstoSet(X× A,B) Example
- The set of binary sequences is equinumerous with P(ℕ), hence uncountable Example
- Coextension of scalars Hom_R(S,M) carries its canonical left S-module structure Lemma
- Discrete sequence spaces are complete in ZF Lemma
- Finite words satisfy the free-monoid universal property Lemma
- For an indexed family (Aᵢ)_i ∈ I the collection of functions f with domain I and f(i) ∈ Aᵢ for every i ∈ I is a set Lemma
- Prescribed-start and starting-point-free serial choice are equivalent in ZF Lemma
- The free associative R-algebra on a set and descent of relations Lemma
- Groups and group homomorphisms form the large locally small category Grp Proposition
- Left modules over a fixed ring and module homomorphisms form the large locally small category R-Mod Proposition
- Posets and monotone maps form the large locally small category Poset Proposition
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category Set Proposition
- Topological spaces and continuous maps form the large locally small category Top Proposition
- Unital rings and unit-preserving ring homomorphisms form the large locally small category Ring Proposition
- Vector spaces over a fixed field and linear maps form the large locally small category Vect_F Proposition
- Currying gives the adjunction -× A⊣(-)^A in Set Theorem
- The end of the function-set functor on a representable is evaluation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Function (mathematics) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Exponentiation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)