How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Evaluation of functions is dinatural in its argument set
Example
Fix a set and let be
contravariant in by precomposition and covariant in (The set of all functions , The Cartesian product , Sets and functions form the large locally small category ). The evaluation family
is a dinatural transformation from to the constant functor at (Dinatural transformation between functors on ), that is, a cowedge under with vertex (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , the functor displayed above, and the family of evaluation functions.
The functions form the set , and Thus holds if and only if . (The set of all functions ).
The elements of are exactly the ordered pairs: Thus holds if and only if for some and some . (The Cartesian product ).
Sets as objects and functions as morphisms form a large locally small category (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
For every set the product functor is left adjoint to , with naturally in and ; the bijection sends to (Currying gives the adjunction in ).
A dinatural transformation is a family such that every satisfies , the equation displayed by the hexagon (Dinatural transformation between functors on ).
A cowedge from to is a dinatural transformation from to a constant functor: a family with for every (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).
Verification
The assignment is a functor: for the contravariant slot acts by from to and the covariant slot by itself, and both actions preserve identities and composites because composition of functions does. The family is the transpose of the identity of under the bijection of [L1] with and , so it is the counit of that adjunction at .
Fix and chase an arbitrary element of through both legs of the hexagon. Since the target is the constant functor at , both outer actions on the target side are identities, and the two legs are and . The first sends to and the second sends it to . The two values agree for every , so the two legs are equal.
Since the target is the constant functor at , the equation verified in step 2.1 is exactly the cowedge equation of [F2], so the evaluation family is a cowedge under with vertex , and in particular a dinatural transformation.
Remarks
The displayed evaluation family supplies only diagonal components. There is no canonical evaluation map for unrelated , and no natural family of such maps extending evaluation in general; special cases such as singleton may admit constant maps. What the family always has is one component per object on the diagonal, tied together by the equation checked above, which is precisely the shape dinaturality was defined to capture.
The chase uses nothing about . If is empty then is empty unless is, and the two legs are then functions with empty domain, which are equal for that reason; the computation above covers that case without a separate argument, since it verifies the two legs agree at every element of the domain.
Depends on
- Dinatural transformation between functors on $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C$
- Currying gives the adjunction $-\times A\dashv(-)^A$ in $\mathbf{Set}$
- The set $B^{A}$ of all functions $A \to B$
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Set}$
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- F. Loregian, (Co)end Calculus (arXiv:1501.02503v7), Remark 1.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Richter, From Categories to Homotopy Theory (author's draft), Examples 4.4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)