How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dinatural transformation between functors on
Definition
Let and be categories (Category, object, morphism, domain, codomain, identity, composition, and hom-collection) and let
be functors on the product of with (Opposite category , Product category and its projection functors, Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor). A morphism of is a pair in which is a morphism of and is a morphism of from to , that is, a morphism of . Thus a morphism of supplies the four morphisms
A dinatural transformation is a family of morphisms
of such that every morphism of satisfies the dinaturality equation
between morphisms . The morphism is the component of at .
The two sides pass through the six objects , , , , and , so the diagram expressing the dinaturality equation is a six-sided cycle and is called the hexagon:
Remarks
A dinatural transformation is a family indexed by the objects of and constrained by the morphisms of , exactly as a natural transformation is (Natural transformation and its components); what differs is which constraint. A natural transformation between two functors on is a family indexed by the pairs , and its naturality equation is imposed for every morphism of the product category. A dinatural transformation has components only on the diagonal, and the dinaturality equation is imposed only for the morphisms of that connect two diagonal entries through the two off-diagonal entries displayed above.
At all four displayed morphisms of the product category are identities, so the hexagon reads . The identity morphisms of therefore impose no condition, and a dinatural transformation carries no analogue of the identity clause of a functor.
Depends on
Used by
- The end and the coend of a functor CᵒᵖtimesCtoD Definition
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form Definition
- Evaluation of functions is dinatural in its argument set Example
- FALSE: dinatural transformations compose False statement
- A wedge on a product index category is exactly a family dinatural in each variable separately Lemma
- Composing a dinatural transformation with a natural transformation on either side gives a dinatural transformation Proposition
- The end of a functor made mute in its contravariant variable is the ordinary limit of that functor Proposition
- A natural transformation of functors induces a unique morphism of their ends and of their coends Theorem
- Dinatural transformations do not compose in general Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- F. Loregian, (Co)end Calculus (arXiv:1501.02503v7), Definition 1.1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Richter, From Categories to Homotopy Theory (author's draft), Definition 4.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)