Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The end and the coend of a functor Cop×CD

Definition

Let T:Cop×CD be a functor and let Wd(T) and Cwd(T) be the categories of wedges over T and of cowedges under T (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).

An end of T is a terminal object of Wd(T), and a coend of T is an initial object of Cwd(T) (Initial object, terminal object, and zero object). In short: an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge. Neither need exist.

Written out, an end is a pair (e,ω) in which ωc:eT(c,c) is a wedge and, for every wedge (x,ξ) over T, there is exactly one morphism u:xe with

ωcu=ξcfor every object c of C.

A coend is a pair (q,ρ) in which ρc:T(c,c)q is a cowedge and, for every cowedge (x,ξ) under T, there is exactly one morphism v:qx with vρc=ξc for every c.

The vertex of an end is written cT(c,c) and the vertex of a coend cT(c,c), the subscripted integral denoting the end and the superscripted one the coend. The components ωc of the terminal wedge are the projections of the end and the components ρc of the initial cowedge the injections of the coend. The variable c in the integral notation is bound: it names the dinatural variable and nothing else.

Remarks

Because an end is a dinatural transformation (Dinatural transformation between functors on Cop×C) with a universal property rather than an element-level construction, the definition applies to any target category D whatever, and it never asserts existence. Which functors have ends, and in which targets, is a separate question answered by the comparison theorems on this page and by the hypotheses they carry.

The projections ωc are indexed by the objects of C, while the wedge equation they satisfy is indexed by its morphisms. Thus an end records the family of diagonal values together with every tie imposed through the off-diagonal values T(c,c). For a discrete category there are no nonidentity ties and the end reduces to the product of the diagonal values.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources