How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The kernel end and coend distinguish the regular and co-regular bimodules
Statement
For the identity functor of a finite -linear abelian category , the two kernel formulas of the categorical Eilenberg–Watts triangle give the regular and co-regular bimodules, which need not be isomorphic: the end is the regular bimodule , while the coend is the co-regular bimodule (Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps, The end and the coend of a functor ; Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors). These are generally non-isomorphic as -bimodules, so an end and a coend of the same functor need not agree; both are the identity's images under the Nakayama calculus of Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus. Witness: for the upper triangular algebra of the companion counterexample (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), has dimension while has dimension ; hence as bimodules (-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual , Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Vector space over a field) and the regular and co-regular kernels are distinguished. Under the equivalences of the triangle these two objects correspond to the identity functor as an object of and of respectively (The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor).
Example
For the identity functor of a finite -linear abelian category , the two kernel formulas of the categorical Eilenberg–Watts triangle give the regular and co-regular bimodules, which need not be isomorphic: the end is the regular bimodule , while the coend is the co-regular bimodule (Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps, The end and the coend of a functor ; Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors). These are generally non-isomorphic as -bimodules, so an end and a coend of the same functor need not agree; both are the identity's images under the Nakayama calculus of Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus. Witness: for the upper triangular algebra of the companion counterexample (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), has dimension while has dimension ; hence as bimodules (-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual , Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Vector space over a field) and the regular and co-regular kernels are distinguished. Under the equivalences of the triangle these two objects correspond to the identity functor as an object of and of respectively (The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -linear abelian category with module model for a finite-dimensional unital -algebra , the regular -bimodule and the co-regular bimodule , together with the Eilenberg–Watts functors of the triangle (Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus, -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual ); and the upper triangular -algebra with -basis , unit , , , and all remaining products of basis elements zero (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms, Vector space over a field, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).
For a finite -bimodule with and , the coend is the coend of with universal cowedge , , and the end is the end of with universal wedge , ; in particular the (co)end object is itself in the bimodule model (Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps, The end and the coend of a functor ).
The identity functor satisfies , since by the unit isomorphism, and , since by double duality and evaluation at (Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors, Natural isomorphism, Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual ).
The tensor product over is functorial in the first variable, so an isomorphism of right -modules, in particular an isomorphism of -bimodules , induces a natural isomorphism , and naturally in ; for the algebra the element satisfies , so is a -subspace and is the image of right multiplication by (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups, -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).
Verification
The end is the regular bimodule: apply [F1] with and , the regular -bimodule. Then by [F2], so the end of the identity diagram is the end of the diagram and equals the (co)end object of [F1], with universal wedge .
For one has of dimension , because , and ; and has dimension , because expresses as the composite of with the map , whose image is of dimension , and every functional on that direct summand of extends to .
The coend is the co-regular bimodule: apply [F1] with and . Then by [F2], so the coend is the coend of the diagram and equals the (co)end object of [F1], with universal cowedge ; under the identification the object is the regular and the co-regular bimodule.
Consequently has dimension , by the multiplication isomorphism with inverse , while has dimension by the unit isomorphism of [F3].
The bimodules and are not isomorphic: an isomorphism would by [F3] induce an isomorphism , hence equality of dimensions, contradicting step 2.2. Hence the regular kernel and the co-regular kernel of steps 1.1 and 2.1 are distinguished, so an end and a coend of the same functor need not agree.
Finally, the end is the image of the identity functor regarded as an object of under , and the coend is the image of the identity regarded as an object of under , by steps 1.1 and 2.1; applying and recovers the Nakayama functors and of the Nakayama calculus (Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus, The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor).
Depends on
- Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms
- Linear functionals and the algebraic dual $V^*=\mathcal L(V,F)$
- $(S,R)$-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- The end and the coend of a functor $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathcal D$
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus
- Linear map between vector spaces over the same field
- Natural isomorphism
- Vector space over a field
- Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps
- Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors
- Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially
- The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, author final version, §1.11 (Definition 1.11.1 and Proposition 1.11.2 with its coalgebra-realization sketch), printed pp.15–16 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1 and (2.1)), §2.3 ((2.6)–(2.9)), §2.4 (Proposition 2.8, Corollary 2.9 and (2.18)–(2.31)), §§3.1–3.2 (Definition 3.1, Theorem 3.2, Lemma 3.3, Proposition 3.4 and Corollaries 3.5–3.7), §3.5 (Definition 3.14, Lemmas 3.15–3.16 and (3.56)–(3.58)) (standard reference, not scraped)