Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The kernel end and coend distinguish the regular and co-regular bimodules

Statement

For the identity functor of a finite k-linear abelian category A≃A-mod, the two kernel formulas of the categorical Eilenberg–Watts triangle give the regular and co-regular bimodules, which need not be isomorphic: the end ∫a∈Aaˉ⊠1(a) is the regular bimodule A, while the coend ∫a∈Aaˉ⊠1(a) is the co-regular bimodule A∗ (Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps, The end and the coend of a functor Cop×C→D; Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors). These are generally non-isomorphic as A-bimodules, so an end and a coend of the same functor need not agree; both are the identity's images under the Nakayama calculus of Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus. Witness: for the upper triangular algebra A0 of the companion counterexample (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), A0∗⊗A0A0e1 has dimension 2 while A0e1 has dimension 1; hence A0∗≇A0 as bimodules ((S,R)-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F), Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Vector space over a field) and the regular and co-regular kernels are distinguished. Under the equivalences of the triangle these two objects correspond to the identity functor as an object of Rex⁡ and of Lex⁡ respectively (The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor).

Example

For the identity functor of a finite k-linear abelian category A≃A-mod, the two kernel formulas of the categorical Eilenberg–Watts triangle give the regular and co-regular bimodules, which need not be isomorphic: the end ∫a∈Aaˉ⊠1(a) is the regular bimodule A, while the coend ∫a∈Aaˉ⊠1(a) is the co-regular bimodule A∗ (Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps, The end and the coend of a functor Cop×C→D; Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors). These are generally non-isomorphic as A-bimodules, so an end and a coend of the same functor need not agree; both are the identity's images under the Nakayama calculus of Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus. Witness: for the upper triangular algebra A0 of the companion counterexample (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), A0∗⊗A0A0e1 has dimension 2 while A0e1 has dimension 1; hence A0∗≇A0 as bimodules ((S,R)-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F), Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Vector space over a field) and the regular and co-regular kernels are distinguished. Under the equivalences of the triangle these two objects correspond to the identity functor as an object of Rex⁡ and of Lex⁡ respectively (The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite k-linear abelian category with module model A≃A-mod for a finite-dimensional unital k-algebra A, the regular (A,A)-bimodule A and the co-regular bimodule A∗=Hom⁡k(A,k), together with the Eilenberg–Watts functors Φl,Φr,Ψl,Ψr of the triangle (Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus, (S,R)-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F)); and the upper triangular k-algebra A0 with k-basis e1,e2,u, unit 1=e1+e2, e12=e1, e22=e2, e1u=u=ue2 and all remaining products of basis elements zero (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms, Vector space over a field, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).

[F1]

For a finite (B,A)-bimodule M with F=Φl(M)=Hom⁡A(M∗,−) and G=Φr(M)=M⊗A−, the coend ∫aaˉ⊠F(a) is the coend of a↦F(a)⊗ka∗ with universal cowedge ρa:F(a)⊗ka∗→M, ρa(f⊗λ)=λ∘f, and the end ∫aaˉ⊠G(a) is the end of a↦G(a)⊗ka∗ with universal wedge ωa:M→Hom⁡k(a,G(a)), ωa(m)(x)=m⊗x; in particular the (co)end object is M itself in the bimodule model (Finite Eilenberg–Watts kernels: explicit end and coend universal maps, The end and the coend of a functor Cop×C→D).

[F2]

The identity functor satisfies 1A≅Φr(A), since Φr(A)(X)=A⊗AX≅X by the unit isomorphism, and 1A≅Φl(A∗), since Φl(A∗)(X)=Hom⁡A(A∗∗,X)≅Hom⁡A(A,X)≅X by double duality and evaluation at 1A (Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors, Natural isomorphism, Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module, Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F)).

[F3]

The tensor product over A is functorial in the first variable, so an isomorphism of right A-modules, in particular an isomorphism of (A,A)-bimodules A∗→A, induces a natural isomorphism A∗⊗A−≅A⊗A−, and A⊗AX≅X naturally in X; for the algebra A0 the element e1 satisfies e12=e1, so A0e1 is a k-subspace and A0∗e1 is the image of right multiplication by e1 (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups, (S,R)-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).

Verification

1.1givenF1F2

The end is the regular bimodule: apply [F1] with A=B and M=A, the regular (A,A)-bimodule. Then G=Φr(A)≅1A by [F2], so the end ∫aaˉ⊠1(a) of the identity diagram is the end of the diagram a↦G(a)⊗ka∗ and equals the (co)end object M=A of [F1], with universal wedge ωa(m)(x)=m⊗x.

1.2givenF3

For A0 one has A0e1=span⁡{e1} of dimension 1, because e1e1=e1, e2e1=0 and ue1=0; and A0∗e1 has dimension 2, because (λ⋅e1)(x)=λ(e1x) expresses λ⋅e1 as the composite of λ with the map x↦e1x, whose image is e1A0=span⁡{e1,u} of dimension 2, and every functional on that direct summand of A0 extends to A0.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

The coend is the co-regular bimodule: apply [F1] with A=B and M=A∗. Then F=Φl(A∗)≅1A by [F2], so the coend ∫aaˉ⊠1(a) is the coend of the diagram a↦F(a)⊗ka∗ and equals the (co)end object M=A∗ of [F1], with universal cowedge ρa(f⊗λ)=λ∘f; under the identification Aop⊠A≃(A,A)-bimod the object A is the regular and A∗ the co-regular bimodule.

2.2step 1.2F3

Consequently A0∗⊗A0A0e1≅A0∗e1 has dimension 2, by the multiplication isomorphism λ⊗x↦λ⋅x with inverse ν↦ν⊗e1, while A0⊗A0A0e1≅A0e1 has dimension 1 by the unit isomorphism of [F3].

3.1step 2.1step 2.2F3

The bimodules A0∗ and A0 are not isomorphic: an isomorphism would by [F3] induce an isomorphism A0∗⊗A0A0e1≅A0⊗A0A0e1, hence equality of dimensions, contradicting step 2.2. Hence the regular kernel A0 and the co-regular kernel A0∗ of steps 1.1 and 2.1 are distinguished, so an end and a coend of the same functor need not agree.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2∎

Finally, the end A=Ψr(1A) is the image of the identity functor regarded as an object of Rex⁡(A,A) under Ψr, and the coend A∗=Ψl(1A) is the image of the identity regarded as an object of Lex⁡(A,A) under Ψl, by steps 1.1 and 2.1; applying Φr and Φl recovers the Nakayama functors Nr=ΦrΨl(1A)≅A∗⊗A− and Nl=ΦlΨr(1A)≅Hom⁡A(A∗,−) of the Nakayama calculus (Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus, The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources