How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The left-to-right exact equivalence need not preserve the identity
Statement refuted
The equivalence of The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor need not send the identity functor to a functor naturally isomorphic to the identity. Witness: let be the -algebra with -basis (Field, Vector space over a field, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis), unit (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), orthogonal idempotents , , products , and all remaining products of basis elements zero; these are the upper triangular matrices. Let . The Nakayama functor of Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus satisfies by Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors, and evaluating on the projective left module (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module, Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module) gives while ; hence is not naturally isomorphic to the identity and the equivalence does not preserve the identity object (Natural isomorphism).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the -algebra with -basis , unit , , , and all remaining products of basis elements zero (Field, Vector space over a field, Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), the category of finite-dimensional left -modules, and the Nakayama functor (Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus, Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors).
A left -module is an abelian group with a scalar action satisfying , , and ; the submodule is the image of the -linear map , and because and (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module, Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module, -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions).
The -dual is a right -module under , and denotes the image of the right multiplication map , ; on the free left module the tensor product is generated by elementary tensors subject to (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups, Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).
For a finite-dimensional -vector space the dimension is the cardinality of a basis, and a -linear isomorphism preserves dimensions (Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Vector space over a field, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).
The functor of the categorical Eilenberg–Watts triangle sends the identity functor regarded as left exact to ; a natural isomorphism would give an isomorphism of -vector spaces (The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor, Natural isomorphism).
Counterexample
The algebra is well defined: the -linear assignment , , identifies with the algebra of upper triangular matrices, in which the listed products hold and multiplication is associative; consequently are orthogonal idempotents summing to , , , and .
The left ideal equals the -span of : from , and one gets for the coefficient functional of , so has . It is moreover projective in the lifting sense of Projective modules and the lifting property: by [F1] it is a direct summand of with projection , the free module has the lifting property because a -linear map out of is determined by its value at the generator , which can be lifted along any epimorphism, and restricting a lift of to lifts a given .
The image has dimension : for one computes , so for the -linear map , , whose image is of dimension by step 1.1; the restriction map , , is surjective since a functional on the direct summand extends by zero on , and composition with the surjection is injective, so has dimension .
By [F2] the multiplication map , , is a well-defined surjection, and it is injective with inverse : indeed , and for one has and . Hence , and since by the given data, step 2.2 gives .
Since while , the vector spaces and are not isomorphic, so by [F4] there is no natural isomorphism ; equivalently is not naturally isomorphic to the identity functor. By [F4] the equivalence sends the identity functor, regarded as left exact, to , so it does not send the identity to a functor naturally isomorphic to the identity, and the equivalence does not preserve the identity object.
Depends on
- Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms
- $(S,R)$-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Field
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Left and right Nakayama functors by finite kernel calculus
- Linear map between vector spaces over the same field
- Natural isomorphism
- Projective modules and the lifting property
- Vector space over a field
- Nakayama kernels give well-defined adjoint functors
- Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially
- The left-to-right exact equivalence sends the identity to the Nakayama functor
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, author final version, §1.11 (Definition 1.11.1 and Proposition 1.11.2 with its coalgebra-realization sketch), printed pp.15–16 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1 and (2.1)), §2.3 ((2.6)–(2.9)), §2.4 (Proposition 2.8, Corollary 2.9 and (2.18)–(2.31)), §§3.1–3.2 (Definition 3.1, Theorem 3.2, Lemma 3.3, Proposition 3.4 and Corollaries 3.5–3.7), §3.5 (Definition 3.14, Lemmas 3.15–3.16 and (3.56)–(3.58)) (standard reference, not scraped)