How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Deligne product of finite vector spaces is finite vector spaces
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be the category of finite-dimensional -vector spaces (Vector space over a field, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis), a finite -linear abelian category whose algebra model is for the algebra (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms, k-linear categories and k-linear functors, Abelian category). Then Finite Deligne products exist via tensor-product algebras with identifies with : the tensor-product algebra is (The tensor product of -algebras has multiplication ), the universal bifunctor is the ordinary tensor product , and the universal property is that of The Deligne product of finite linear categories. The equivalence respects the universal bifunctors up to canonical natural isomorphism (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories).
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be the category of finite-dimensional -vector spaces (Vector space over a field, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis), a finite -linear abelian category whose algebra model is for the algebra (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms, k-linear categories and k-linear functors, Abelian category). Then Finite Deligne products exist via tensor-product algebras with identifies with : the tensor-product algebra is (The tensor product of -algebras has multiplication ), the universal bifunctor is the ordinary tensor product , and the universal property is that of The Deligne product of finite linear categories. The equivalence respects the universal bifunctors up to canonical natural isomorphism (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), a field , the category of finite-dimensional -vector spaces, the algebra , and the algebra .
A left -module is exactly a -vector space, and the finite-dimensional -vector spaces form the category , so the algebra model of is (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms, Vector space over a field, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).
The -algebra has multiplication and unit (The tensor product of -algebras has multiplication ).
For finite-dimensional -algebras the category with the tensor bifunctor is a Deligne product of and , and a Deligne product is unique up to an equivalence respecting the universal bifunctors, its universal property being an equivalence between -linear right exact functors out of it and -linear bifunctors right exact in each variable (Finite Deligne products exist via tensor-product algebras, The Deligne product of finite linear categories).
Verification
The algebra is finite-dimensional and unital over the field [F1], and the multiplication of [F2] on satisfies ; the -linear map , , has the multiplication map , , as a two-sided inverse, so as -algebras and [F1].
By [F3] with , the category together with the tensor bifunctor is a Deligne product of and ; under the algebra isomorphism of step 1.1, a module over is a -vector space, so , and the universal bifunctor is the ordinary tensor product on (k-linear categories and k-linear functors).
Hence is identified with , the universal bifunctor being , and its universal property is exactly the defining property of a Deligne product of finite -linear categories [F3]; since Deligne products are unique up to an equivalence respecting the universal bifunctors, the identification respects the universal bifunctors up to canonical natural isomorphism (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories, The Deligne product of finite linear categories).
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Abelian category
- Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms
- The Deligne product of finite linear categories
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories
- k-linear categories and k-linear functors
- Vector space over a field
- Finite Deligne products exist via tensor-product algebras
- The tensor product of $R$-algebras has multiplication $(a\otimes b)(a'\otimes b')=aa'\otimes bb'$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, author final version, §1.11 (Definition 1.11.1 and Proposition 1.11.2 with its coalgebra-realization sketch), printed pp.15–16 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1 and (2.1)), §2.3 ((2.6)–(2.9)), §2.4 (Proposition 2.8, Corollary 2.9 and (2.18)–(2.31)), §§3.1–3.2 (Definition 3.1, Theorem 3.2, Lemma 3.3, Proposition 3.4 and Corollaries 3.5–3.7), §3.5 (Definition 3.14, Lemmas 3.15–3.16 and (3.56)–(3.58)) (standard reference, not scraped)