How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The tensor product of -algebras has multiplication
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be -algebras. The -module has a unique -algebra structure satisfying
and
If and are commutative, then is commutative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and central unital -algebras .
In an -algebra, the structure map is central and multiplication is -bilinear (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms).
Finite tensor products represent multilinear maps (Finite iterated tensor products represent multilinear maps independently of parenthesization).
The tensor product is an -module with (Over a commutative ring, is an -module with ).
An elementary-tensor formula descends exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced (A formula on elementary tensors defines a homomorphism exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced).
Proof
The map is -multilinear: centrality in [L1] lets a scalar move among the four variables without changing the value.
By [L2], step 1.1 induces an -bilinear multiplication with the displayed pure-tensor formula; [L4] ensures that the formula has descended before any ring laws are used.
Both sides of associativity are trilinear in the three tensor arguments and agree on pure tensors by associativity in and ; uniqueness in [L2] makes them equal everywhere. Both distributive laws hold because the multiplication from step 2.1 is bilinear.
Left and right multiplication by are linear maps that agree with the identity on every pure tensor, so uniqueness in the two-factor case of [L2] makes them the identity maps.
If and are commutative, then . The two bilinear multiplication maps therefore induce the same four-variable multilinear map, so [L2] gives commutativity for arbitrary tensors.
The map , , is a unital ring homomorphism and its image is central, checked on pure tensors using [L1] and [L3]. Thus the resulting ring is an -algebra.
Uniqueness in [L2] forces the multiplication from its displayed pure-tensor formula, while the identity and structure map are then forced by the displayed elements. Steps 2.1 through 4.1 prove existence and all asserted properties.
Depends on
- Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms
- Finite iterated tensor products represent multilinear maps independently of parenthesization
- Over a commutative ring, $M\otimes_RN$ is an $R$-module with $r(m\otimes n)=(rm)\otimes n=m\otimes(rn)$
- A formula on elementary tensors defines a homomorphism exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced
Used by
- Global functions on geometrically connected and geometrically reduced proper schemes Corollary
- Affine-overlap separation condition Definition
- Bialgebras and bialgebra maps Definition
- Bialgebras, counits and antipodes over a commutative ring Definition
- Enveloping algebra and the bimodule–module dictionary Definition
- Graded coalgebras, bialgebras and Hopf algebras over a commutative ring Definition
- Leg notation and quasitriangular Hopf algebras Definition
- Semilinear Galois actions, twists, and split central idempotents Definition
- The degenerate affine Hecke algebra Definition
- The formal quantum shuffle Borel and its Cartan crossed product Definition
- Weak bialgebras, weak Hopf algebras, and counital maps Definition
- ℂ⊗_ℝℂ≅ℂ×ℂ as ℝ-algebras Example
- For a field extension K/F, one has K⊗_FMₙ(F)≅ Mₙ(K) as K-algebras Example
- S⊗_RR[x]≅ S[x] as S-algebras Example
- The Deligne product of finite vector spaces is finite vector spaces Example
- The double-edge Serre relation for the cyclic affine type A₁⁽¹⁾ Example
- The product of two parabolas: a block Jacobian and the direct-sum formula Example
- The quasiprimitive Serre element in type A₂ Example
- Base change of standard smooth presentations Lemma
- Bilinear right exact functors are determined by their value on the regular modules Lemma
- Field extension preserves the graded pieces and the total length of a zero-dimensional projective quotient Lemma
- Finite-type field extensions with zero Ω Lemma
- Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras Lemma
- Presentation base change and transport of explicit bases to commutative specializations Lemma
- Regular tensor-algebra multiplication is detected at the unit tensor Lemma
- The character ring of a direct product is the tensor product of the factor character rings Lemma
- The coproduct preserves the positive and negative quantum Serre ideals Lemma
- The opposite Deligne product is the category of finite bimodules Lemma
- The two standard bialgebra compatibility formulations are equivalent Lemma
- The type-A quantum presentation descends to its coproduct tensor action Lemma
- Enveloping algebra of a direct sum Proposition
- Hopf-algebra structure on U(g) Remark
- Bialgebra module tensor actions and their coherence Theorem
- Categorical Eilenberg–Watts equivalences for finite linear categories Theorem
- Finite Deligne products exist via tensor-product algebras Theorem
- Global functions on proper integral schemes form a finite extension of the base field Theorem
- Hopf quotients, kernels of Hopf maps, and tensor products Theorem
- The Drinfeld–Jimbo formulas define a Hopf algebra Theorem
- The finite dual is a coalgebra and descends through bialgebras and Hopf algebras Theorem
- Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode Theorem
…and 1 more result.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Li, Commutative Algebra, Lectures 9-10 (standard reference, not scraped)