Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Enveloping algebra of a direct sum

Statement

For Lie algebras g and h over k, there is a unital algebra isomorphism

U(gh)U(g)kU(h).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Lie algebras g,h over the same field k.

[L1]

The two summands commute in their direct sum (Direct products and direct sums of Lie algebras).

[L2]

Lie maps induce enveloping-algebra maps (Functoriality of the enveloping algebra), and Lie maps into associative commutator algebras extend uniquely (Universal property of the enveloping algebra).

[L3]

The algebra tensor product has multiplication (ab)(ab)=aabb (The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (ab)(ab)=aabb), and bilinear maps factor through the module tensor product (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).

Proof

technique · constructive comparison of the two universal maps
1.1

Define ϕ:gh(U(g)U(h))Lie by ϕ(x,y)=ιg(x)1+1ιh(y). Same-summand commutators give the respective Lie brackets, while the two tensor factors commute, so [L1] makes ϕ a Lie map. By [L2] it extends uniquely to an algebra map Φ:U(gh)U(g)U(h).

L1L2L3construct
1.2

Let α:U(g)U(gh) and β:U(h)U(gh) be induced by the summand inclusions. Their generator images commute by [L1] and the canonical enveloping relation, hence all of α(U(g)) commutes with all of β(U(h)). Therefore (a,b)α(a)β(b) is bilinear and [L3] gives a linear map Ψ:U(g)U(h)U(gh).

L1L2L3constructalgebra
2.1

Commutation of the two images gives Ψ((ab)(ab))=α(aa)β(bb)=α(a)β(b)α(a)β(b), so Ψ is a unital algebra homomorphism.

step 1.2L3algebra
3.1

The composite ΨΦ fixes the canonical images of (x,0) and (0,y), hence is the identity on U(gh) by uniqueness in [L2]. The composites Φα and aa1 agree on ιg(g), and similarly Φβ(b)=1b; thus ΦΨ fixes every pure tensor (a1)(1b)=ab, hence is the identity.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L2L3
4.1

Therefore Φ and Ψ are inverse unital algebra isomorphisms, including when either summand is zero.

step 3.1discharge-construct: step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources