Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global functions on geometrically connected and geometrically reduced proper schemes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field) and let X be a nonempty scheme proper over k (Proper morphisms). Fix an algebraic closure kˉ of k (An algebraic closure of a field) and put Xkˉ=X×Spec⁡kSpec⁡kˉ, the chosen algebraic-closure fibre of X→Spec⁡k at its unique point (Geometric fibres and geometric points, Scheme-theoretic fibre). Assume that this fibre is geometrically connected and geometrically reduced in the sense of Geometric properties of fibres: the scheme Xkˉ is connected (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets) and reduced (The reduction of a scheme).

Then the unit map k→H0(X,OX), c↦c⋅1X, is an isomorphism of k-algebras (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections); equivalently H0(X,OX)≅k as k-algebras.

Geometric reducedness cannot be replaced by reducedness over k: if p is a prime, k=Fp(u) is a rational function field and L=k[T]/(Tp−u) is the purely inseparable degree-p extension Fp(t)/Fp(tp) with tp=u (Purely inseparable algebraic extensions, Fp(t)/Fp(tp) is purely inseparable of degree p and separable degree one), then X=Spec⁡L is nonempty, proper over k, reduced and geometrically connected, but not geometrically reduced, and H0(X,OX)≅L≠k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k with algebraic closure kˉ, a nonempty scheme X proper over k whose geometric fibre Xkˉ=X×Spec⁡kSpec⁡kˉ is connected and reduced, and the rings B=H0(X,OX) and R=H0(Xkˉ,OXkˉ); the Axiom of Choice is declared in the statement.

[F1]

Properness unpacked: a proper morphism is separated, of finite type and universally closed, and a morphism of finite type is locally of finite type, so every point of X has an affine open chart Spec⁡A with A a finitely generated k-algebra; the field k is Noetherian and a finitely generated algebra over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, so these coordinate rings are Noetherian and X is locally Noetherian. (Proper morphisms, Locally finite type and finite type morphisms, A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes)

[F2]

Over a locally Noetherian scheme a quasi-coherent module of finite type is coherent; the structure sheaf is quasi-coherent, being A~ on an affine chart Spec⁡A, and of finite type, being generated by the unit section in the local form of finite generation by finitely many sections. Hence OX is coherent. (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme, Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, Coherent module sheaves, Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme)

[F3]

For a field F, a scheme Y proper over F and a coherent G on Y, every Hq(Y,G) is a finite-dimensional F-vector space and the groups vanish past the length of any finite affine open cover of Y; in particular H0(Y,G) is a finite-dimensional F-vector space. (Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis)

[F4]

A nonempty scheme has a point x, and every point of a scheme has an affine open neighbourhood, so there is an affine open U∋x with (U,OX∣U)≅Spec⁡A and OX(U)≅A; since Spec⁡0=∅, this forces A≠0, so 1A≠0. The restriction map ρ:OX(X)→OX(U) is a unital ring homomorphism, being a restriction map of the sheaf of rings OX, so ρ(1X)=1A≠0 and 1X≠0: the ring H0(X,OX) is nonzero. (Schemes, The underlying space of an affine spectrum, Global functions on Spec A recover A, Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules)

[F5]

Base change along the field extension kˉ/k: the base-change map κq:Hq(X,OX)⊗kkˉ→Hq(Xkˉ,OXkˉ) is an isomorphism for every q≥0, and Xkˉ is proper over kˉ. It is the kˉ-linear extension of the pullback map on cohomology classes, and the pullback map on global sections is a unital ring homomorphism (pullback of structure-sheaf sections is composition of functions); since B⊗kkˉ carries a commutative kˉ-algebra structure, the degree-zero map κ0 is an isomorphism of unital commutative kˉ-algebras. (Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology, Cohomology and base-change map, Variance of sheaf cohomology, The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (a⊗b)(a′⊗b′)=aa′⊗bb′, Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms)

[F6]

Extension of scalars of a finite-dimensional space: for a finite-dimensional k-vector space V with a basis v1,…,vn, the k-bilinear map V⊗kkˉ→kˉn with vi⊗c↦cei is an isomorphism, so dim⁡kˉ(V⊗kkˉ)=dim⁡kV; this uses only the unit and direct-sum compatibilities of the tensor product together with right exactness. (Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Every spanning subset of a vector space contains a basis, Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S, The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M, Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums, Tensoring is right exact)

[F7]

Geometric fibres: for X→Spec⁡k the fibre at the unique point s is Xs=X×Spec⁡kSpec⁡κ(s)≅X because κ(s)=k, so the geometric fibre is Xsˉ=Xs×Spec⁡kSpec⁡kˉ≅X×Spec⁡kSpec⁡kˉ=:Xkˉ, and the tests for the chosen algebraic closure agree up to isomorphism with those for any other choice. By the convention of that definition, "geometrically connected" and "geometrically reduced" for this fibre mean that Xkˉ is connected, respectively reduced, where reducedness of a scheme means that all its local rings have no nonzero nilpotent element. An affine scheme Spec⁡A is reduced exactly when A is reduced. (Geometric fibres and geometric points, Geometric properties of fibres, Scheme-theoretic fibre, Independence of the chosen algebraic closure, Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets, The reduction of a scheme, Reduced affine schemes)

[F8]

A reduced scheme has a reduced ring of global sections: if f∈H0(Y,OY) satisfies fn=0, then each germ fy is nilpotent; in a reduced scheme the local rings have no nonzero nilpotent element, so fy=0 for every y; a section of a sheaf of groups whose germs all vanish is zero. Hence H0(Y,OY) has no nilpotent element other than 0. (The nilradical and reduced rings, The reduction of a scheme, Germs of sections, A section of a sheaf of groups is zero exactly when all of its germs are zero)

[F9]

Idempotents and connectedness: in a local ring the only idempotents are 0 and 1; if e∈H0(Y,OY) is idempotent on a scheme Y, then every germ ey in the local ring OY,y is 0 or 1, the sets Y1={y:ey=1} and Y0={y:ey=0} are disjoint with union Y, and both are open, since on an affine open U=Spec⁡A the identification OU,p≅Ap shows Y1∩U=D(e∣U) and Y0∩U=D(1−e∣U), which are clopen in U; if e≠0,1 then both are nonempty, because Y1=∅ forces all germs of e to vanish and hence e=0, while Y0=∅ gives 1−e=0. Consequently a connected scheme has no idempotent global section other than 0 and 1, and for a commutative ring A the spectrum Spec⁡A is connected if and only if A has no idempotents other than 0 and 1. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a local ring has no idempotents other than 0 and 1, An idempotent partitions the spectrum into complementary clopen subsets, The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is the localization at that prime, A section of a sheaf of groups is zero exactly when all of its germs are zero, The prime spectrum is connected exactly when the ring has no idempotents other than zero and one, Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets)

[F10]

Artinian rings and local rings: a finite-dimensional commutative algebra over a field is Artinian, since a strictly descending chain of ideals is a strictly descending chain of subspaces and a strict inclusion of finite-dimensional spaces strictly lowers the dimension; a nonzero commutative ring has a maximal ideal, an Artinian ring has only finitely many maximal ideals, its nilradical is nilpotent, and for a commutative Artinian ring R≠0 with maximal ideals m1,…,mr the canonical maps R→∏j=1rRmj and R→∏j=1rR/mjn (for n with Nil⁡(R)n=0) are isomorphisms, with every factor R/mjn nonzero because mjn⊆mj≠R; a commutative Artinian local ring has nilpotent maximal ideal; a local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with exactly one maximal ideal, which is the set of its nonunits; and a reduced ring has no nilpotent element other than 0. (Left and right Artinian rings, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal, An Artinian ring has only finitely many maximal ideals, The nilradical of an Artinian ring is a nilpotent ideal, An Artinian ring is canonically the finite product of its localizations at its maximal ideals, An Artinian local ring has nilpotent maximal ideal, and its finite modules have finite length, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal, The nilradical and reduced rings)

[F11]

Algebraically closed fields: a field F is algebraically closed exactly when it has no nontrivial finite extension; every nonconstant polynomial over an algebraically closed field has a root in that field; and the Frobenius map of a field of characteristic p>0 is an injective field endomorphism, so (a+b)p=ap+bp and its n-fold iterate is x↦xpn. (A field is algebraically closed exactly when every nonconstant polynomial splits, equivalently when it has no nontrivial finite extension, An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field, Frobenius x↦xp is an injective endomorphism in characteristic p, and an automorphism for finite fields)

[F12]

Algebras, quotients, affine fibre products and finite morphisms: for commutative R-algebras A,B the tensor product A⊗RB is a commutative R-algebra; tensoring the presentation k[T]/(f) of a quotient with a k-algebra C gives (k[T]/(f))⊗kC≅C[T]/(f), by right exactness of the tensor product and k[T]⊗kC≅C[T], and more generally M⊗R(R/I)≅M/IM; for affine schemes Spec⁡B×Spec⁡kSpec⁡C≅Spec⁡(B⊗kC) and Γ(Spec⁡A,O)≅A; and every finite morphism of schemes, meaning over affine opens it is the spectrum of a module-finite algebra, is proper. (The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (a⊗b)(a′⊗b′)=aa′⊗bb′, Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras, M⊗RR/I≅M/IM naturally, Tensoring is right exact, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Global functions on Spec A recover A, Finite morphisms of schemes, Finite morphisms are proper)

[F13]

The inseparable example: for a prime p the extension Fp(t)/Fp(tp) is purely inseparable of degree p; writing u=tp and k=Fp(u)=Fp(tp), the element u is not a p-th power in k and L=k[T]/(Tp−u)≅Fp(t) is a field with tp=u; and the base-change computation for such a field, L⊗kL≅L[u]/(up) with u≠0 and up=0, exhibits the base change of a nontrivial purely inseparable extension as a nonreduced local ring. (Fp(t)/Fp(tp) is purely inseparable of degree p and separable degree one, Base change of an inseparable field extension is a thickening, Purely inseparable algebraic extensions)

[F14]

Polynomials: over a field the polynomial ring kˉ[Y] is an integral domain, and in a polynomial ring over a domain the degree of a product of nonzero polynomials is the sum of the degrees; hence Y∉(Yp) for p≥2, because a nonzero multiple Ypg has degree at least p>1=deg⁡Y. (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution, A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain, Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials)

[F15]

Nilpotent ideals with field quotient: if R is a commutative ring and I⊆R is an ideal with In=0 for some n≥1 while R/I is a field, then I is a maximal ideal of R, and every element of I is nilpotent, hence lies in the nilradical, which is the intersection of all prime ideals, while every maximal ideal is prime; so every maximal ideal contains I, making I the unique maximal ideal and R a local ring. Moreover ideals of a quotient ring correspond to ideals containing the kernel, and a unital ring homomorphism out of a polynomial ring is determined by the image of the variable, which identifies kˉ[Y]/(Y)≅kˉ through evaluation at 0. (Correspondence theorem: ideals of R/I correspond to ideals of R containing I, The nilradical is the intersection of all prime ideals, Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime, A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring, Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal)

Proof

technique · direct: transfer $H^0$ along the chosen algebraic closure by flat base change, show that the resulting finite-dimensional $\bar k$-algebra is reduced and has no nontrivial idempotents, factor it into local Artinian pieces, and conclude that it is $\bar k$; then exhibit a purely inseparable field extension whose reducedness over the base does not survive the base change, so that the conclusion fails for the weakened hypothesis
1.1F1F2F3F4

Setup and finiteness of B. By [F1] the proper morphism X→Spec⁡k is of finite type with Noetherian affine charts, so X is locally Noetherian, and OX is coherent by [F2]. Applying [F3] to the coherent sheaf OX on the proper k-scheme X, the ring B=H0(X,OX) is a finite-dimensional k-vector space; since X is nonempty, [F4] gives B≠0, so dim⁡kB≥1.

1.2F5

The base-changed algebra. Put R=H0(Xkˉ,OXkˉ). By [F5] the degree-zero base-change map κ0:B⊗kkˉ→R is an isomorphism of unital commutative kˉ-algebras, so in particular it carries idempotents bijectively to idempotents, and Xkˉ is proper over kˉ.

1.3F61.11.2

Finiteness and nonvanishing of R. By [F6] applied to the finite-dimensional k-space B one has dim⁡kˉ(B⊗kkˉ)=dim⁡kB, so by 1.2 the ring R is a finite-dimensional commutative kˉ-algebra; since B≠0, the tensor product B⊗kkˉ is nonzero and hence R≠0.

1.4F7F8

R is reduced. The geometric fibre Xkˉ is reduced by hypothesis, as recorded in [F7]; by [F8] the ring of global sections of a reduced scheme is reduced, so R has no nonzero nilpotent element.

1.5F7F9

R has no nontrivial idempotents. By hypothesis the geometric fibre Xkˉ is connected, as recorded in [F7]. If e∈R were an idempotent with e≠0 and e≠1, then by [F9] the sets {y:ey=1} and {y:ey=0} would be two nonempty disjoint open subsets covering Xkˉ, contradicting connectedness; hence every idempotent of R is 0 or 1.

1.6F101.3

The Artinian factorisation. By 1.3 the ring R is finite-dimensional over kˉ, hence Artinian by [F10]. Since R≠0, [F10] provides its maximal ideals m1,…,mr, a nonempty finite list, an exponent n with Nil⁡(R)n=0, and isomorphisms R≅∏j=1rRmj≅∏j=1rR/mjn, in which every factor R/mjn is nonzero.

1.7F101.51.6

Only one factor. Suppose r≥2. Since each factor R/mjn of the product in 1.6 is nonzero, the tuple with a 1 in the first coordinate and 0 in all others is a nontrivial idempotent of ∏j=1rR/mjn, which under the isomorphism of 1.6 is a nontrivial idempotent of R, contradicting 1.5. Therefore r=1 and R≅R/m1n≅Rm1.

1.8F101.41.7

R is a field. By 1.7 the ring R is isomorphic to the commutative Artinian local ring Rm1, whose maximal ideal is nilpotent by [F10]. Since R is reduced by 1.4, that maximal ideal contains no nonzero element and is therefore zero; by [F10] the nonunits of a local ring are exactly the elements of its maximal ideal, so every nonzero element of R is a unit and R is a field.

1.9F111.31.8

R is kˉ. The unit map makes R a field containing kˉ, so R/kˉ is a field extension, finite-dimensional by 1.3; by [F11] the algebraically closed field kˉ has no nontrivial finite extension, so this extension is trivial, the unit map kˉ→R is an isomorphism, and dim⁡kˉR=1.

1.10F61.11.31.9

Conclusion. By 1.3 and 1.9, dim⁡kB=dim⁡kˉ(B⊗kkˉ)=dim⁡kˉR=1. The unit map η:k→B is a unital ring homomorphism, so its kernel is an ideal of the field k; it is not all of k because B≠0 from 1.1 gives η(1)=1B≠0, so the kernel is zero and η is injective; its image is a nonzero k-subspace of the one-dimensional k-space B, hence equals B. Therefore η is an isomorphism and H0(X,OX)≅k as k-algebras.

1.11F12F13

The example, setup. Let p be a prime, let k=Fp(u) be the rational function field in one variable and let L=k[T]/(Tp−u), so that u=tp and L≅Fp(t) for the class t of T. By [F13] the ring L is a field, u∉kp, and L/k is the nontrivial purely inseparable extension Fp(t)/Fp(tp) of degree p; in particular L≠k. Put X=Spec⁡L; then X is nonempty and reduced because L is a field, and H0(X,OX)≅L≠k by [F12].

1.12F121.11

X is proper over k. The ring map k→L makes L a finite-dimensional k-vector space, hence a module-finite k-algebra, so Spec⁡L→Spec⁡k is a finite morphism by [F12]; by [F12] every finite morphism of schemes is proper, so X is proper over k.

1.13F7F11F12

The geometric fibre. By [F7] and [F12] one has Xkˉ=Spec⁡(L⊗kkˉ). By [F12] applied to the presentation L=k[T]/(Tp−u) the tensor product satisfies L⊗kkˉ≅kˉ[T]/(Tp−u); since kˉ is algebraically closed, [F11] provides b∈kˉ with bp=u, and the Frobenius identity of [F11] gives Tp−u=Tp−bp=(T−b)p in kˉ[T]; substituting Y=T−b yields L⊗kkˉ≅kˉ[Y]/(Yp)=:A.

1.14F7F14F151.13

The fibre is a nonreduced local ring. In A the class u′ of Y satisfies u′p=0, and u′≠0 because otherwise Y∈(Yp), which is impossible: a nonzero multiple Ypg has degree at least p>1=deg⁡Y by [F14], and g=0 gives Y=0. Hence A is not reduced, and by [F7] the affine scheme Spec⁡A is not reduced. Moreover A is local: the ideal I=(u′) satisfies Ip=0 and A/I≅kˉ[Y]/(Y)≅kˉ is a field by [F15], so I is the unique maximal ideal of A.

1.15F91.131.14

The fibre is connected. By 1.14 the ring A is local, so its only idempotents are 0 and 1 by [F9], and by [F9] the spectrum of a commutative ring is connected exactly when the ring has no idempotents other than 0 and 1; hence the geometric fibre Xkˉ=Spec⁡A is connected.

1.161.111.121.131.141.15

Sharpness. By 1.11 and 1.12 the scheme X=Spec⁡L is nonempty, reduced and proper over k, and by 1.13 and 1.15 it is geometrically connected, while 1.14 shows that its geometric fibre is not reduced, so X is not geometrically reduced; and H0(X,OX)≅L≠k. Thus all the hypotheses of the corollary except geometric reducedness hold for X, but the conclusion fails; geometric reducedness cannot be replaced by reducedness over k.

2.1F3F5F7F9F10F11F121.11.61.71.91.111.14∎

Boundaries and choice accounting. If X=∅ then the conclusion would fail because H0(∅,O)=0, so the nonemptiness hypothesis is essential and the present statement excludes this case; the zero ring appears in [F4] only as Spec⁡0=∅, and the nonvanishing of B and R in 1.1 and 1.3 is what excludes the empty product decomposition r=0 of the structure theorem in 1.6. The case r=1 is precisely the conclusion of 1.7, the field k may be F2 and the prime p in 1.11 may be 2, and the one-dimensional algebra kˉ of 1.9 is the case dim⁡kB=1 of 1.10. The statement imposes no irreducibility, integrality, connectedness of X itself, flatness, reduced-fibre or dimension hypothesis beyond the listed ones, and the example of 1.11-1.16 is a nonreduced geometric fibre over a reduced base scheme, so no hidden reducedness is presupposed in 1.1-1.3. The endpoint of the argument is degree q=0 of the base-change isomorphism in 1.2; the boundary r=1 against r≥2 is decided in 1.7, and the characteristic-2 boundary is covered because the Frobenius identity of [F11] gives (T−b)2=T2−b2 there as well. The Axiom of Choice is used exactly through the finiteness corollary [F3], the base-change theorem [F5], the geometric-fibre conventions [F7], the idempotent and connectedness suppliers [F9], the maximal-ideal and structure theorem suppliers [F10], the algebraically-closed criterion [F11] and the properness of finite morphisms [F12]; the tensor computations of 1.13 and 1.14 and the constructions of 1.1-1.16 make no further selection.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

267 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources