Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Independence of the chosen algebraic closure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For two algebraic closures Ω1,Ω2 of κ(s), a chosen κ(s)-isomorphism σ:Ω1Ω2 identifies the two geometric fibres after transport of scalars. In particular their isomorphism-invariant properties agree. No canonical choice of this identification is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses and conventions in the statement above.

[F1]

A geometric point of a scheme S is a morphism SpecΩS with Ω algebraically closed. For a specified point sS, choose an algebraic closure Ω/κ(s), in the sense of def-algebraic-closure. In this page the geometric fibre at s means Xsˉ=Xs×Specκ(s)SpecΩ. Here Xs is def-scheme-theoretic-fibre, and its affine charts extend as in lem-base-extension-field-coordinate-ring. The choice includes the embedding of κ(s); no preferred algebraic closure or preferred isomorphism between choices is implied. (Geometric fibres and geometric points)

[F2]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, any two algebraic closures of a field F are F-isomorphic. No uniqueness of the isomorphism is asserted. (Assuming Choice, any two algebraic closures are base-isomorphic)

[F3]

For SkShS and an S-scheme X, there is a canonical isomorphism (X×SS)×SSX×SS. It is functorial in X and compatible with the induced maps of S-schemes. (Iterated base change)

Proof

1.1

F2 supplies a base-field isomorphism σ:Ω1Ω2 under Choice. By F1 the two fibres are Xs×κ(s)SpecΩi.

givenF1F2
2.1

Base change the first fibre along σ and apply F3 to identify it with the second fibre. On affine charts the ring isomorphism is aλaσ(λ), whose inverse uses σ1. Empty charts and the identity choice satisfy the same formulas. Thus the schemes are isomorphic after scalar transport, and all isomorphism-invariant properties agree, independently of the chosen isomorphism.

F3step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources