How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Correspondence theorem: ideals of correspond to ideals of containing
Statement
Correspondence theorem: ideals of correspond to ideals of containing .
For , and are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between ideals of containing and ideals of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An ideal and .
is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel (The canonical projection is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel ).
Kernels of ring homomorphisms are ideals (The kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal).
Ideals are additive subgroups with absorption (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
Proof
If contains , then is an ideal of ; if is an ideal of , then is an ideal containing .
Surjectivity gives , and gives ; inclusion is preserved.
Therefore the two assignments give the claimed correspondence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Ring Homomorphisms and Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)