How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical affine points are maximal ideals
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For every affine algebraic set and , the map is a bijection from to the maximal ideals of . Its residue-field map is the canonical -isomorphism given by evaluation. Both sets are empty when is empty.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an algebraically closed field , and an affine algebraic set with coordinate ring .
Evaluation in the polynomial ring has maximal kernel (Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)).
Ideals of the quotient correspond to ideals upstairs containing (Correspondence theorem: ideals of correspond to ideals of containing ).
Maximal ideals upstairs are uniquely the coordinate-point ideals (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal).
Closed algebraic sets satisfy (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).
Proof
At , evaluation on kills and hence defines evaluation on ; constants make it surjective. Its kernel is maximal by the same argument as F2, or by correspondence with the maximal evaluation ideal upstairs. Two points with equal kernels have equal inverse images upstairs, and F4 makes the points equal.
If is maximal in , its inverse image in is maximal by F3. F4 identifies it with the evaluation ideal at a unique . Since it contains , . Thus . Evaluation induces a bijection : equality of values is exactly equality modulo the kernel, and every constant is attained. It preserves all operations. For , has no proper, hence no maximal, ideals.
Sources
Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Example 2.13, 2.20, and §3e, pp. 41, 43, 65. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.
Depends on
- Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals
- The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set
- Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal
- Correspondence theorem: ideals of $R/I$ correspond to ideals of $R$ containing $I$
- Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, Example 2.13, 2.20, and §3e, pp. 41, 43, 65 (standard reference, not scraped)