Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical affine algebraic sets and reduced finitely generated k-algebras are contravariantly equivalent

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. Affine algebraic sets over algebraically closed k, with locally regular morphisms, are contravariantly equivalent to reduced finite-type unital k-algebras. Both object realization and full faithfulness hold, including the correspondence 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and an algebraically closed field k; the categories of affine algebraic sets and of reduced finite-type unital k-algebras, with zero algebras allowed.

[F1]

Coordinate rings of algebraic sets are reduced and finite type (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).

[F2]

Reducedness excludes nonzero nilpotents and finite type supplies a polynomial presentation (A reduced finitely generated k-algebra).

[F3]

Radical ideals are exactly vanishing ideals of their zero loci (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F4]

The morphism dictionary is a natural bijection for all algebraic sets (Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).

[F5]

Points are canonically the maximal ideals of the coordinate ring (Classical affine points are maximal ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every algebraic set X, F1 places k[X] in the proposed algebra category, and F4 makes pullback a contravariant functor that is bijective on every hom-set. Thus it is fully faithful, including the empty cases already verified there.

F1F4given
1.2

Given a reduced finite-type algebra B, choose a surjective presentation R=k[T1,,Tm]B with kernel J. If hrJ for r1, the image of h is nilpotent and hence zero by reducedness, so hJ. Therefore J is radical. F3 gives I(V(J))=J, and the presentation identifies k[V(J)]=R/J with B. For B=0, J=R and V(J)=.

F2F3given
2.1

The object realization can be made intrinsic: use the maximal ideals of B, with the topology and regular functions transported from any presentation. F5 identifies the points, and the algebra isomorphism between two presentations gives inverse morphisms by F4. Their pullbacks are the prescribed identities on B, so full faithfulness forces all such comparison maps and their composites to agree. Thus the realization is independent up to canonical isomorphism, and step 1.1 with step 1.2 proves the antiequivalence.

F4F5step 1.1step 1.2

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3e and Proposition 3.25, pp. 65–67. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources