Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page develops the classical affine dictionary over an algebraically closed field. It distinguishes possibly empty algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties, proves the coordinate-ring and regular-function identifications, and constructs morphisms, germs and function fields. Principal-open localization is proved with zero divisors allowed. Rational maps are compared on nonempty opens, glued to their maximal affine-target domains, and composed under dominance. The field-embedding correspondence then gives birational equivalence, including integral varieties with compatible affine atlases. Nullstellensatz-dependent results explicitly assume Choice; finite irreducible decomposition also records the inherited Dependent Choice hypothesis.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical affine algebraic sets, including the empty boundaries

Definition

Fix an algebraically closed field k and n0. Write R=k[x1,,xn] for the iterated polynomial ring of Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration. Algebraic closure has the meaning of An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field. For any SR, define V(S)={akn:for every fS, f(a)=0}. An affine algebraic set is any such subset, including the empty set. Here k0={()} and R=k when n=0. With the abbreviations V(0):=V({0}) and V(1):=V({1}), one has V()=V(0)=kn and V(1)=: an empty list of equations imposes no condition, whereas 1(a)=10. Evaluation, as in Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring, is performed successively in the finitely many variables.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2a, pp. 36–37. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A classical zero locus depends only on the generated ideal and its radical

Statement

For SR=k[x1,,xn], one has V(S)=V((S))=V((S)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k, a nonnegative integer n, and a subset SR=k[x1,,xn].

[F1]
[F2]
[F3]

Membership in the radical means a positive power lies in the ideal (The radical of an ideal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If aV(S), then every q=irisi(S) satisfies q(a)=iri(a)si(a)=0. Conversely S(S), so vanishing on (S) implies vanishing on S. Thus V(S)=V((S)).

F1F2givenalgebra
2.1

Write J=(S). If aV(J) and qmJ for m1, then q(a)m=0, hence q(a)=0 in the field k. Thus V(J)V(J). The reverse inclusion follows from JJ.

F1F3step 1.1algebra

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2a p. 36; Theorem 2.16 preamble p. 42. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets

Statement

Affine zero loci are the closed sets of a topology on kn: arbitrary intersections and finite unions are zero loci. In particular V(I)V(J)=V(IJ). Every algebraic subset X carries the induced topology, whose closed sets are XV(S).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k, a nonnegative integer n, arbitrary equation sets in k[x1,,xn], and ideals I,J in that ring.

[F1]
[F2]

Replacing equations by their generated ideal does not change their zero locus (A classical zero locus depends only on the generated ideal and its radical).

[F3]

The product ideal consists of finite sums of products (The sum I+J and product IJ of two-sided ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For any indexed family (Sλ), a tuple vanishes on λSλ exactly when it vanishes on every Sλ. Hence λV(Sλ)=V(λSλ); the empty intersection is kn.

F1given
1.2

If aV(I)V(J), every product of an element of I with one of J vanishes at a, hence every element of IJ does. If a belongs to neither locus, there are fI,gJ with f(a),g(a)0; then (fg)(a)0, so aV(IJ). This proves both inclusions.

F3givenalgebra
2.1

Replace arbitrary equation sets by generated ideals and iterate the two-set union identity. The zero-set identities for 0 and 1 supply the empty union and the full space. Intersecting these identities with X verifies the induced closed-set axioms.

F1F2step 1.1step 1.2

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 2.10, pp. 38–39. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The classical vanishing ideal

Definition

For any subset Ekn, define I(E)={fk[x1,,xn]:f(a)=0 for every aE}. This is the vanishing ideal. Indeed 0I(E), (fg)(a)=00=0 for f,gI(E), and (rf)(a)=r(a)0=0 for any polynomial r. These verify Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals. Also fmI(E), m1, implies f(a)m=0 and hence f(a)=0 for every aE; thus I(E) is radical. Vacuous quantification gives I()=R.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2e pp. 40–42. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Zero loci and vanishing ideals form a Galois connection

Statement

For Ekn and an ideal JR, EV(J) iff JI(E). Both I and V reverse inclusion. Moreover V(I(E))=E in the Zariski topology, and V(I(V(J)))=V(J).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k, a subset Ekn, and an ideal JR=k[x1,,xn].

[F1]

Zero loci use a universal condition on equations (Classical affine algebraic sets, including the empty boundaries).

[F2]

Vanishing ideals use a universal condition on points (The classical vanishing ideal).

[F3]

Every closed zero locus can be defined by an ideal (A classical zero locus depends only on the generated ideal and its radical).

[F4]

Zero loci are exactly the Zariski closed sets (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

EV(J) says that for every aE and every fJ, f(a)=0. Interchanging these two universal quantifiers says precisely JI(E). Enlarging E imposes more conditions on I(E); enlarging J imposes more equations on V(J). This proves both reversals.

F1F2given
2.1

Every point of E lies in V(I(E)). If a closed set V(J) contains E, step 1.1 gives JI(E) and therefore V(I(E))V(J). Thus V(I(E)) is the smallest closed set containing E. Applying this to the already closed set E=V(J) gives the last identity.

F3F4step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 2.10 pp. 38–39, Proposition 2.14 p. 41, and Remark 2.23 p. 44. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For every ideal JR=k[x1,,xn], I(V(J))=J. Together with V(I(X))=X for algebraic X, these are inverse inclusion-reversing bijections between radical ideals and algebraic sets. Nonempty irreducible algebraic sets correspond precisely to proper prime ideals, and points to maximal ideals. The empty set corresponds to R. For A=R/I(X) the same correspondence identifies radical ideals of A with closed subsets of X; in particular IX(VX(H))=H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k, AC, an ideal JR=k[x1,,xn], and an affine algebraic set Xkn. In the relative assertion let H be an ideal of R/I(X).

[F1]

Under AC and algebraic closure, I(V(J))=J (Strong Nullstellensatz: I(V(I)) equals the radical of I).

[F2]

The zero-locus/ideal connection reverses inclusion and closes algebraic sets (Zero loci and vanishing ideals form a Galois connection).

[F3]

Zero loci are closed under finite unions (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

[F4]

Prime ideals are proper and satisfy the product test (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

[F5]

Every maximal ideal has a unique coordinate point (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal).

[F6]

Ideals of a quotient correspond to ideals containing its kernel (Correspondence theorem: ideals of R/I correspond to ideals of R containing I).

[F7]

Taking radicals commutes with quotient correspondence (Radicals and quotient correspondence).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The ring is a finite-variable polynomial ring over algebraically closed k, so the strong Nullstellensatz applies with the assumed AC and gives I(V(J))=J. The other composite is the identity on closed sets by F2. For radical J the first composite is also the identity, proving the stated inverse bijections and their inclusion reversal.

F1F2given
1.2

If X is nonempty irreducible and fgI(X), then X=(XV(f))(XV(g)). Irreducibility forces one of these closed sets to be X, hence fI(X) or gI(X). Also 1I(X) because X has a point. Thus I(X) is prime.

F3F4given
2.1

Conversely suppose P=I(X) is prime. Then X is nonempty, since I()=R. If X=CD with C,D proper closed subsets, choose fI(C)I(X) and gI(D)I(X); these exist by the injective reversing correspondence in step 1.1. The product vanishes on CD=X, contradicting primality. Thus X is irreducible. For any prime P, the elementary implication frPfP makes P radical, so step 1.1 realizes it by such an X.

F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra
2.2

For a point a, evaluation onto k has kernel I({a}). A proper ideal strictly containing this kernel would contain an f with f(a)0; subtracting ff(a) in the kernel puts a nonzero constant in that ideal, hence 1. Thus the kernel is maximal. Conversely F5 writes each maximal ideal as (xiai)i, whose locus is exactly {a}. The unit ideal has empty locus, and the empty set has vanishing ideal R.

F5step 1.1algebra
3.1

Let π:RA be the quotient and HA. Its inverse image contains I(X), so its zero locus lies in X and equals VX(H). Polynomial vanishing upstairs gives I(VX(H))=π1H. Passing to the quotient using F6 and F7 yields IX(VX(H))=H. This also proves the relative closed-set correspondence.

F1F6F7step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, 2.13–2.17, 2.20, 2.27–2.28 and §2i, pp. 41–49. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A classical affine variety

Definition

Over an algebraically closed field k, a classical affine variety is a nonempty affine algebraic set Xkn which is irreducible in its Zariski topology: if X=CD with C,D closed in X, then C=X or D=X. The empty algebraic set is not a variety; a singleton, including k0, is irreducible. This convention reserves “algebraic set” for the possibly reducible or empty case.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2h p. 45. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Irreducibility is equivalent to the nonempty-open intersection criterion

Statement

For a nonempty topological space X, irreducibility is equivalent to the intersection of every two nonempty open subsets being nonempty. Every nonempty open subspace of an irreducible space is itself irreducible and dense. This applies to the classical Zariski spaces.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty topological space X. For the inheritance assertions assume X irreducible and let UX be nonempty open.

[F1]

Irreducibility excludes a union of two proper closed subsets (A classical affine variety).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Two disjoint nonempty opens U,V give the proper closed cover X=(XU)(XV). Conversely a proper closed cover X=CD gives disjoint nonempty opens XC,XD. Taking complements proves both directions of the criterion.

F1given
2.1

If U is nonempty open in irreducible X, each nonempty open W of X meets U by step 1.1. Thus no proper closed subset of X contains U, which says U=X. If V1,V2 are nonempty opens of U, they are opens of X because U is open, so they intersect. The criterion makes U irreducible.

step 1.1given

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2h p. 45. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense

Statement

Every nonempty open subset of an irreducible classical affine variety X is dense. Every finite intersection of nonempty open subsets of X is nonempty and dense; the intersection of the empty family is X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An affine variety X over algebraically closed k, a nonempty open of X, and a finite family of nonempty opens of X.

[F1]

Nonempty opens of an irreducible space are dense and irreducible, and two such opens meet (Irreducibility is equivalent to the nonempty-open intersection criterion).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The density assertion is F1 with the irreducible nonempty space X. For a finite list U1,,Ur, start with W0=X and set Wj=Wj1Uj. If Wj1 is nonempty open, F1 gives Wj; intersection preserves openness. Finite induction gives Wr nonempty open.

F1given
2.1

F1 now makes Wr dense. This includes r=0, since W0=X is nonempty and its closure is itself.

F1step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2h p. 45. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set

Definition

For any affine algebraic set Xkn, its coordinate ring is k[X]=k[x1,,xn]/I(X). Write xˉi for the coordinate classes. The quotient operations and identity are those of The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I and For a two-sided ideal I, the additive cosets form a ring R/I with identity 1+I. The structure map sends ck to its constant class; all k-algebras and maps are unital, with the zero algebra allowed. Thus k[]=0, where 0=1. Since I(X) is radical by The classical vanishing ideal, k[X] is reduced: fˉm=0 implies fmI(X) and hence fI(X), so fˉ=0. The finite coordinate classes generate it as a k-algebra.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2i p. 48. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A classical affine variety has a domain coordinate ring, and conversely

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For an affine algebraic set X, X is a classical affine variety if and only if k[X] is a nonzero integral domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, and an affine algebraic set Xkn.

[F1]

Nonempty irreducible algebraic sets correspond to prime vanishing ideals (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F2]

The coordinate ring is the quotient by the vanishing ideal (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).

[F3]

A quotient is a domain exactly when the ideal is prime (R/P is an integral domain if and only if P is a prime ideal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If X is a variety, F1 makes I(X) prime. The polynomial ring is commutative, so F3 applied to I(X) and the quotient in F2 says k[X] is a nonzero domain.

F1F2F3given
2.1

If k[X] is a nonzero domain, F3 makes I(X) prime, and F1 makes X nonempty irreducible. In particular the zero ring k[] is excluded on both sides.

F1F2F3given

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 2.27 and §2i, pp. 45–48. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring

Statement

Evaluation induces an isomorphism of k-algebras from k[X] to the algebra of polynomial functions Xk, including X=.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An affine algebraic set Xkn over an algebraically closed field k.

[F1]

The coordinate ring is R/I(X) (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).

[F3]

A ring modulo the kernel maps isomorphically onto the image (First isomorphism theorem for rings: R/kerfimf).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Give all functions Xk pointwise operations. Evaluating a polynomial at each point defines a unital k-algebra homomorphism e:RkX, by iterated polynomial evaluation, since sums and products evaluate to sums and products. Its image is exactly the polynomial functions. Its kernel consists exactly of the polynomials vanishing on every point, namely I(X).

F1F2givenalgebra
2.1

F3 gives R/I(X)ime by [f](af(a)), and constants show it is an isomorphism over k. When X is empty there is one function, its function algebra is the zero ring, and kere=R; the same quotient identification applies.

F3step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2i p. 48. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A principal open subset of a classical affine variety

Definition

For an affine algebraic set X and fk[X], the principal open is DX(f)={xX:f(x)0}. Evaluation is independent of a polynomial representative by Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring. The complement is the relatively closed zero locus of that representative. In particular DX(0)= and DX(1)=X. The notation applies to reducible and empty algebraic sets as well as varieties.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2i p. 49. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection

Statement

The principal opens DX(f) form an open basis on every affine algebraic set X, and DX(f)DX(g)=DX(fg).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An affine algebraic set Xkn over algebraically closed k, elements f,gk[X], and an open UX.

[F1]

A closed subset of X is given by simultaneous polynomial equations (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

[F2]

D(f) is the set where f is nonzero (A principal open subset of a classical affine variety).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For f,gk[X], f(x)g(x)0 in the field k exactly when both factors are nonzero. This proves the intersection identity, including f=0 or g=0 and f=1.

F2givenalgebra
2.1

If U=X(XV(S)) is open, then xU exactly when some sS does not vanish at x. Hence U=sSDX(sˉ). Each member is open and contained in U. This gives a principal neighbourhood of each point of U, and the empty S gives the empty union.

F1F2given

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 2.37, p. 49. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A regular function on an open subset of a classical affine variety

Definition

Let U be open in an affine algebraic set X and A=k[X]. A function s:Uk is regular if for each xU there are an open neighbourhood WU of x and g,hA with h(y)0 for every yW such that s(y)=g(y)/h(y) there. Write OX(U) for these functions. The quotient need only hold locally; no single fraction on all of U is required. On the empty open the unique empty function is regular. Constants are regular by c=c/1.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Definition 3.8, p. 61. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical regular functions satisfy locality and unique gluing

Statement

Regular functions on opens in an affine algebraic set form unital k-algebras, have restriction homomorphisms, and glue uniquely from every compatible open cover. Regularity can be checked on an open cover.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open U in an affine algebraic set X over algebraically closed k. For gluing, an open cover U=iUi and regular functions si agreeing on overlaps.

[F1]

Regularity means having a quotient expression near each point (A regular function on an open subset of a classical affine variety).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Near a given point, intersect the neighbourhoods on which s=g/h and t=a/b with h,b nowhere zero. Then s+t=(gb+ah)/(hb), st=ga/(hb), and s=g/h on this intersection; the denominators are nonzero there. Constants are c/1. Pointwise ring laws therefore give a k-algebra, including the zero function algebra on the empty open.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

Restricting a quotient expression to its intersection with a smaller open preserves regularity. Pointwise sums, products and constants restrict to themselves, so restriction is a unital algebra homomorphism; iterated restrictions agree.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Given U=iUi and regular si with equal restrictions on every overlap, the union of their function graphs is a function s:Uk: for a fixed point all available values coincide. On Ui it equals si, hence near each point it has the quotient expression of that section. Thus it is regular. A function with these restrictions must have that same value at every point, proving uniqueness. For the empty cover of the empty open its graph is empty.

F1given

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.9, p. 61. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For every affine algebraic set X, A=k[X] and fA, the map AfOX(DX(f)),a/fr(xa(x)/f(x)r) is an isomorphism of unital k-algebras. If DX(f)=, then f=0 in the reduced ring A, and both sides are zero rings.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, an affine algebraic set X, A=k[X], and fA.

[F1]

Relative Nullstellensatz gives IX(VX(H))=H for every ideal of A (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F2]

Equality of polynomial functions on all of X is equality in A (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

[F4]

Regular sections have local quotient expressions (A regular function on an open subset of a classical affine variety).

[F6]

A map inverting the denominators extends uniquely to the localization (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert S factor uniquely through S1R).

[F7]

A fraction is zero when some allowed denominator annihilates its numerator (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Restriction AOX(D(f)) is a unital algebra map. The function 1/f is regular on D(f), so F6 extends restriction to the displayed map. If a/fr maps to zero, a vanishes on D(f); hence fa vanishes everywhere on X, since f=0 outside D(f). F2 gives fa=0 in A, and F7 makes the fraction zero. This proves injectivity without cancellation in A.

F2F4F5F6F7givenalgebra
1.2

Fix sOX(D(f)). At each point take a local expression s=g/h and refine its neighbourhood to D(a)D(f)D(h) by F3. The inclusion VX(h)VX(a) gives a(h) by F1. Thus ae=hb for some e1,bA. On D(a), set t=ae and c=gb; then D(t)=D(a) and s=c/t.

F1F3F4givenalgebra
2.1

Consider the set of all pairs (t,c) obtained in step 1.2; their opens D(t) cover D(f) and are contained in it. Thus f vanishes on the simultaneous zero locus of the t2. By F1, f(t2: (t,c) as above). F8 supplies finitely many of these pairs (ti,ci) and uiA with fN=i=1muiti2, for some N1. No compactness theorem or simultaneous choice of neighbourhoods is needed.

F1F8step 1.2
3.1

For pD(f) and each selected pair, if ti(p)0 then ci(p)=s(p)ti(p); if ti(p)=0 then both ci(p)ti(p) and s(p)ti(p)2 are zero. Hence iui(p)ci(p)ti(p)=s(p)iui(p)ti(p)2=s(p)f(p)N. Division by the nonzero scalar f(p)N shows that (iuiciti)/fN maps to s. This proves surjectivity.

step 1.2step 2.1algebra
4.1

If D(f) is empty, f is the zero function on X, hence zero in A by F2. Localizing at 0 is the zero ring by F7; the empty domain has one function and its algebra is zero. If f=1, the same construction gives global sections and A1=A. Together with injectivity and surjectivity this proves all cases.

F2F7step 1.1step 3.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Lemma 3.10 and Proposition 3.11, pp. 61–62. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A classical affine algebraic set has a unique finite irredundant decomposition

Statement

Assume also Dependent Choice for the cited minimal-prime existence theorem. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. Every affine algebraic set X has a finite irredundant decomposition into nonempty irreducible closed subsets, unique up to permutation. These are its maximal irreducible closed subsets. The empty set has the empty decomposition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, an algebraically closed field k, and an affine algebraic set Xkn.

[F1]

A finite-variable polynomial ring over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian (If R is Noetherian then R[x1,,xn] is Noetherian for every nN).

[F3]

A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of finitely many minimal primes, with the empty intersection for the unit ideal (A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is a finite intersection of minimal primes).

[F4]

Prime ideals correspond to irreducible closed sets; radical ideals are recovered from their loci (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every ideal of the field k is either 0 or k: a nonzero member is invertible, putting 1 in the ideal. These ideals are generated by 0 and 1, respectively, so F2 makes k Noetherian and F1 makes R=k[x1,,xn] Noetherian, including n=0. Apply F3 to the radical ideal I(X), with its stipulated DC cost, to obtain its distinct minimal primes P1,,Pm with I(X)=iPi.

F1F2F3given
2.1

Put Xi=V(Pi). F4 makes each nonempty irreducible. A point outside every Xi admits fiPi nonzero there; the finite product belongs to every Pi and is nonzero at the point. Thus V(iPi)iXi; the reverse inclusion follows because every element of the intersection vanishes on each Xi. So X=iXi. For m=0, the intersection is R and the union empty. Distinct minimal primes are incomparable; F4 therefore makes the Xi incomparable.

F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

An irreducible nonempty closed set Z covered by finitely many closed sets must be contained in one: repeatedly split the cover as the first member and the union of the others; if Z is not contained in the first, irreducibility puts it in the remaining union. For a one-member cover this ends immediately; a zero-member cover cannot cover nonempty Z. Thus every irreducible closed subset of X is contained in some Xi, and incomparability makes the Xi precisely the maximal ones. It also prevents removal of an Xi from the cover.

F4F5step 2.1
4.1

If X=jYj is another finite irredundant irreducible closed decomposition, step 3.1 puts each Yj inside an Xi and that Xi inside some Yh. Irredundancy forces Yj=Yh (otherwise Yj could be removed), so Yj=Xi. Reversing the two covers shows their members coincide. After removal of duplicate indexing, this is uniqueness up to permutation.

step 3.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Propositions 2.27, 2.31 and Corollary 2.32, pp. 45–47. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A reduced finitely generated k-algebra

Definition

A reduced finite-type k-algebra is a commutative unital k-algebra A admitting a finite list a1,,an such that every element is a polynomial in that list with coefficients from k, and such that am=0, m1, implies a=0. With the terminology of The nilradical and reduced rings and Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, equivalently finite type means admitting a surjection k[T1,,Tn]A. The zero algebra is included. “Module-finite” instead means finitely generated as a k-module; finite type does not impose that condition.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3e pp. 65–66. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical affine points are maximal ideals

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For every affine algebraic set X and A=k[X], the map xmx=ker(evx:Ak) is a bijection from X to the maximal ideals of A. Its residue-field map A/mxk is the canonical k-isomorphism given by evaluation. Both sets are empty when X is empty.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, and an affine algebraic set X with coordinate ring A.

[F2]

Evaluation in the polynomial ring has maximal kernel (xiai)i (Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n)).

[F3]

Ideals of the quotient correspond to ideals upstairs containing I(X) (Correspondence theorem: ideals of R/I correspond to ideals of R containing I).

[F4]

Maximal ideals upstairs are uniquely the coordinate-point ideals (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

At xX, evaluation on R kills I(X) and hence defines evaluation on A; constants make it surjective. Its kernel is maximal by the same argument as F2, or by correspondence with the maximal evaluation ideal upstairs. Two points with equal kernels have equal inverse images upstairs, and F4 makes the points equal.

F1F2F3F4given
2.1

If M is maximal in A, its inverse image in R is maximal by F3. F4 identifies it with the evaluation ideal at a unique x. Since it contains I(X), xV(I(X))=X. Thus M=mx. Evaluation induces a bijection A/mxk: equality of values is exactly equality modulo the kernel, and every constant is attained. It preserves all operations. For X=, A=0 has no proper, hence no maximal, ideals.

F1F3F4step 1.1F5

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Example 2.13, 2.20, and §3e, pp. 41, 43, 65. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For every affine algebraic set X, the canonical map k[X]OX(X) is an isomorphism. This includes varieties and the empty set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, and an affine algebraic set X.

[F1]

For any f, AfOX(D(f)) (Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply F1 to f=1. Then D(1)=X, so the displayed isomorphism is A1OX(X). The maps AA1, aa/1, and A1A, a/1ra, are mutually inverse algebra maps.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

The composite sends a to its function on X, which is exactly the canonical map in the statement. If X is empty both algebras are the zero ring by the empty case of F1.

F1step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.11 final paragraph, p. 62. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety

Definition

Let U be open in an affine algebraic set X and let Y be an affine algebraic set. A set map ϕ:UY is a morphism over k if sϕOX(U) for every sOY(Y). For a map whose target is an open subset of an affine algebraic set, the phrase locally regular morphism means a continuous map pulling regular functions on each target open back to regular functions on its inverse image. An isomorphism between open subsets of affine algebraic sets is a bijection for which the map and its inverse are locally regular morphisms. Continuity and this local pullback property for the affine-target definition will be established in the next lemma; they are not assumed in the affine-target test.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3d and Proposition 3.26, pp. 64–67. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Images and set-theoretic fibres of classical regular maps

Definition

For a morphism ϕ:UY, its image is ϕ(U)={ϕ(x):xU}, and its fibre over yY is the set ϕ1({y})={xU:ϕ(x)=y}. These are set-theoretic notions. A fibre can be empty. No assertion that images are closed is part of this definition; a fibre here is not a scheme fibre or an ideal quotient.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2j pp. 49–50. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets

Statement

An affine-target morphism ϕ:UY pulls every Zariski closed subset of Y back to a relatively closed subset of U, hence is continuous. The zero set of every regular function on any open of an affine algebraic set is relatively closed. For every open WY and every regular function s on W, sϕ is regular on ϕ1(W).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k, an open U in an affine algebraic set X, an affine algebraic target Y, and a morphism ϕ:UY in the global-pullback definition.

[F1]

Closed subsets of Y are simultaneous coordinate polynomial zero loci (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

[F2]

Regular functions are locally quotients of polynomial functions (A regular function on an open subset of a classical affine variety).

[F3]

Global regular functions pull back to regular functions (A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If r is regular on an open U and r(x)0, write r=a/b near x with b nowhere zero. Intersect that neighbourhood with D(a); it is a neighbourhood of x where r is nowhere zero. Thus the nonvanishing set of r is open, and its zero set is relatively closed in U.

F2given
2.1

Write C=YV(S). Each coordinate polynomial restricted to Y is globally regular (its denominator is 1), so F3 makes its pullback regular. Therefore ϕ1(C) is the intersection of their closed zero sets by step 1.1. This proves continuity, including empty and full closed sets.

F1F3step 1.1
3.1

For xϕ1(W), take a neighbourhood W0W of ϕ(x) where s=g/h with h nowhere zero. On the open ϕ1(W0), gϕ,hϕ are regular and the latter is nowhere zero. Near x, write them as a/b,c/d with b,d nonzero. Shrink further to where c0 using step 1.1. Then sϕ=ad/(bc) is a valid local quotient, proving the local pullback property.

F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3d and Proposition 3.26, pp. 64–67. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For affine algebraic sets X,Y, pullback gives a natural bijection Mork(X,Y)Homk-alg(k[Y],k[X]). It reverses composition and preserves identities. Restricted to nonempty irreducible sets, this is an antiequivalence with nonzero finite-type domain k-algebras: every such domain is a coordinate ring. Empty algebraic sets and zero unital algebras are allowed in the displayed bijection.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, affine algebraic sets X,Y, and, for the object realization, a nonzero finite-type domain k-algebra B.

[F1]

Global regular functions identify with coordinate rings (Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring).

[F2]

A morphism is defined by pullback of global regular functions (A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety).

[F3]

Coordinate-ring elements are polynomial functions (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

[F4]

A homomorphism is uniquely determined by its values on coefficients and variables (Universal property of R[x]: a coefficient homomorphism and the image of x determine a unique ring homomorphism).

[F5]
[F6]

A prime presentation ideal defines a nonempty irreducible set with exactly that vanishing ideal (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F7]

Finite-type algebras admit finite polynomial presentations (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[F8]

Affine-target morphisms pull back locally regular functions on arbitrary opens (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If ϕ:XY is a morphism, F1 and F2 identify ssϕ as a map k[Y]k[X]. Pointwise addition, multiplication and constants show it is a unital k-algebra homomorphism.

F1F2givenalgebra
1.2

Conversely let α:k[Y]k[X] be a unital k-algebra map, with Ykm and coordinate classes yj. Define ϕ(x)=(α(y1)(x),,α(ym)(x)). If PI(Y) then polynomial evaluation and the homomorphism laws give P(ϕ(x))=α(P(y1,,ym))(x)=0. Hence ϕ(x)V(I(Y))=Y.

F3F4F5F6givenalgebra
2.1

Every global regular function of Y is a polynomial in the yj by F1 and F3. Substitution in step 1.2 gives sϕ=α(s), a polynomial and hence regular function on X. Thus ϕ is a morphism and its pullback is α. If one starts with ϕ, its pulled-back coordinate values reconstruct exactly ϕ(x), so the constructions are inverses.

F1F2F3step 1.2
3.1

For composable morphisms, s(ψϕ)=(sψ)ϕ, so (ψϕ)=ϕψ; F8 ensures the composites are morphisms, and the identity pulls each function to itself. This also gives naturality of the bijection. If X is empty there is one map to any Y and one unital homomorphism to k[X]=0. If Y is empty and X nonempty there is neither a set map nor a unital map 0k[X], since 0=1 would force k[X]=0. Both empty gives one on each side.

F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

Let B be a nonzero finite-type domain. By F7 choose a surjection k[T1,,Tr]B with kernel P. It is proper since B0, and uvP forces one image to be zero since B is a domain; thus P is prime. F6 gives a variety V(P) with I(V(P))=P. Its coordinate ring is the presentation quotient B. Together with the bijection and composition law this proves the stated antiequivalence on domains.

F6F7step 2.1step 3.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Propositions 3.24–3.26, pp. 66–67. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical affine algebraic sets and reduced finitely generated k-algebras are contravariantly equivalent

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. Affine algebraic sets over algebraically closed k, with locally regular morphisms, are contravariantly equivalent to reduced finite-type unital k-algebras. Both object realization and full faithfulness hold, including the correspondence 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and an algebraically closed field k; the categories of affine algebraic sets and of reduced finite-type unital k-algebras, with zero algebras allowed.

[F1]

Coordinate rings of algebraic sets are reduced and finite type (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).

[F2]

Reducedness excludes nonzero nilpotents and finite type supplies a polynomial presentation (A reduced finitely generated k-algebra).

[F3]

Radical ideals are exactly vanishing ideals of their zero loci (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F4]

The morphism dictionary is a natural bijection for all algebraic sets (Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).

[F5]

Points are canonically the maximal ideals of the coordinate ring (Classical affine points are maximal ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every algebraic set X, F1 places k[X] in the proposed algebra category, and F4 makes pullback a contravariant functor that is bijective on every hom-set. Thus it is fully faithful, including the empty cases already verified there.

F1F4given
1.2

Given a reduced finite-type algebra B, choose a surjective presentation R=k[T1,,Tm]B with kernel J. If hrJ for r1, the image of h is nilpotent and hence zero by reducedness, so hJ. Therefore J is radical. F3 gives I(V(J))=J, and the presentation identifies k[V(J)]=R/J with B. For B=0, J=R and V(J)=.

F2F3given
2.1

The object realization can be made intrinsic: use the maximal ideals of B, with the topology and regular functions transported from any presentation. F5 identifies the points, and the algebra isomorphism between two presentations gives inverse morphisms by F4. Their pullbacks are the prescribed identities on B, so full faithfulness forces all such comparison maps and their composites to agree. Thus the realization is independent up to canonical isomorphism, and step 1.1 with step 1.2 proves the antiequivalence.

F4F5step 1.1step 1.2

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3e and Proposition 3.25, pp. 65–67. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Affine-source morphisms agreeing on a dense open agree everywhere

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. If X,Y are affine varieties and two morphisms ϕ,ψ:XY agree on a dense open subset of X, they agree everywhere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, affine varieties X,Y over algebraically closed k, and morphisms ϕ,ψ:XY agreeing on a dense open of X.

[F1]

Global regular functions on X are elements of its coordinate ring (Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring).

[F2]

Coordinate functions on Y pull back to regular functions (A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety).

[F3]

Zero sets of regular functions on an open source are relatively closed (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Embed Ykm and write yj for its coordinates. The functions rj=yjϕyjψ are global regular functions by F1 and F2. Their zero sets are closed by F3. The common dense open is contained in every such zero set, hence each zero set is all of X.

F1F2F3given
2.1

Thus for every xX and every j, yj(ϕ(x))=yj(ψ(x)). Equality of all coordinates is equality of the tuples, so ϕ(x)=ψ(x). For m=0 the target has just the empty tuple and this conclusion is immediate as well.

step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.26 and the separatedness calculation of §5c, pp. 67, 102. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Germs and the local ring of a classical affine variety

Definition

For a point x of an affine algebraic set X, a germ of a regular function at x is a pair (U,s), where U is an open neighbourhood of x and sOX(U), modulo equality on some open neighbourhood of x contained in both domains. Write OX,x for the set of germs. Reflexivity uses U; symmetry reverses equality; transitivity intersects the two witness neighbourhoods, which still contain x. Add and multiply representatives after restricting to their intersection. If either representative is replaced by an equivalent one, intersect the two equality neighbourhoods: there both sums and both products agree. Thus the operations are well-defined. The restriction and algebra laws of Classical regular functions satisfy locality and unique gluing on a common finite intersection give a unital k-algebra; constants define its structure map. Evaluation of a germ at x is well-defined by the same equality condition. Its local-ring property is proved in the following theorem.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3b, p. 60. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The classical affine local ring is localization at the point's maximal ideal

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For x in an affine variety X, put A=k[X] and mx=kerevx. The map AmxOX,x,a/sgermx(a/s) is an isomorphism. The unique maximal ideal corresponds to germs vanishing at x, and the residue field is canonically k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an affine variety X over algebraically closed k, a point xX, and A=k[X].

[F1]

The point ideal is maximal and its residue field is k (Classical affine points are maximal ideals).

[F2]

Germs are equality classes on neighbourhoods, with well-defined operations and evaluation (Germs and the local ring of a classical affine variety).

[F3]

Every neighbourhood of x contains a principal neighbourhood of x (Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection).

[F4]
[F5]

A fraction is zero if a permitted denominator annihilates its numerator (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).

[F6]

Localization at a prime is local with maximal ideal consisting of fractions whose numerator is in the prime (Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp).

[F7]

A polynomial function zero on all of X is zero in A (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Each smx has s(x)0 and the germ of 1/s on D(s) is its multiplicative inverse. F4 therefore defines the displayed map to the germ algebra. Every germ has a representative g/h near x with h(x)0, so is in its image.

F1F2F4given
2.1

If a/s has zero germ, a/s vanishes on a neighbourhood of x inside D(s). F3 supplies D(h) containing x inside this neighbourhood. On D(h) the numerator a vanishes, and outside D(h) the factor h vanishes. Hence ha=0 as a function on X, and F7 makes it zero in A. Since h(x)0, F5 gives a/s=0 in Amx. Thus the map is injective.

F3F5F7step 1.1
3.1

The ideal mx is prime: if ab(x)=0 in the field k, one factor evaluates to zero, and 1 does not. F6 applies and says the unique maximal ideal consists of a/s with a(x)=0. Because s(x)0, this is exactly the condition that its germ evaluates to zero. Evaluation is onto k through constants and identifies its quotient with k, giving the residue-field assertion.

F1F2F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Corollary 3.12 and 3.17, pp. 62–64. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For an affine variety X and 0fA=k[X], DX(f) with its regular functions is isomorphic to the closed graph Z={(x,t)X×k:tf(x)=1}. Its coordinate ring is canonically A[T]/(Tf1)Af, a nonzero domain; hence DX(f) is affine in this intrinsic realization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an affine variety X over algebraically closed k, A=k[X], and a nonzero element fA.

[F1]

A variety has a nonzero domain coordinate ring and conversely (A classical affine variety has a domain coordinate ring, and conversely).

[F7]
[F8]

Locally regular functions pull back under morphisms (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

[F9]

Every global regular function on an affine algebraic set belongs to its coordinate ring (Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring).

[F10]

Coordinate-ring elements are polynomial functions in the coordinate classes (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

In B=A[T]/(Tf1) the classes of T and f are inverses. F6 defines AfB sending a/fr to aTr. Conversely F4 and F5 define BAf by T1/f, since the relation maps to zero. The composites fix A and T on one side and send a/fr to itself on the other, hence are identities.

F4F5F6givenalgebra
2.1

By F1, A is a domain. Since f0, fractions with powers of f embed into its fraction field (a zero image forces the numerator zero). Thus Af, and hence B, is a nonzero domain. The polynomial presentation of B has prime kernel: the inverse image of 0 under its surjection is proper and satisfies the product test. F7 makes its zero locus precisely Z and its coordinate ring exactly B. F1 therefore makes Z a variety.

F1F7step 1.1algebra
3.1

The projection p:ZX has image D(f), and q:D(f)Z, x(x,1/f(x)), is its set-theoretic inverse. Projection is a morphism by the coordinate dictionary F3. The coordinate pullbacks for q are regular: those of X are polynomial restrictions and the last is 1/f, which belongs to F2. Every global regular function on Z is a polynomial in its coordinates by F9 and F10, so q is a morphism as well.

F2F3step 2.1F9F10
4.1

F8 upgrades these maps to pullback on all target opens. Viewing p as a map into the open D(f) has the same property, because any section on an open there is a section on the same open in X. Thus p and q are inverse locally regular morphisms. Finally D(f) is nonempty: otherwise f is the zero polynomial function, contrary to f0 by F2.

F2F8step 3.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3h pp. 71–72 and Proposition 3.11 pp. 61–62. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A classical affine open subset and its coordinate ring

Definition

An affine open subset U of a classical affine variety X is an open subset equipped with an isomorphism, in the locally regular sense, to a classical affine variety. Assume AC for the coordinate-ring and principal-open interfaces used here. Its coordinate algebra is OX(U); any specified affine realization identifies this algebra with that realization’s coordinate ring. Two such identifications differ by the pullback of their transition isomorphism in Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, so the algebra of functions on U is independent of the realization. Nonempty principal opens have this property by Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety. Arbitrary opens are not declared affine.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3h pp. 71–72. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety

Definition

Assume AC for the domain-coordinate interface used here. For a classical affine variety X, its function field is k(X)=Frac(k[X]). The coordinate ring is a nonzero integral domain by A classical affine variety has a domain coordinate ring, and conversely, so The field of fractions Frac(D)=(D{0})1D of an integral domain and Frac(D) is a field and dd/1 embeds the integral domain D give a field and the injective map aa/1. Elements have the form a/b with b0; they are called rational functions. Equality is a/b=c/d iff ad=bc. Fractions are field elements, not initially functions defined at every point.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §2i p. 49 and §3k p. 74. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For an affine variety X and nonempty open U, there is a canonical injective k-algebra map OX(U)k(X). A quotient presentation on any nonempty open subdomain computes the same field element, and these embeddings commute with restrictions to nonempty opens.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an affine variety X over algebraically closed k, a nonempty open UX, and a regular function s on U.

[F1]

Finite intersections of nonempty opens are nonempty and dense (Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense).

[F2]

Polynomial functions identify faithfully with elements of the coordinate ring (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

[F3]

Every regular section is locally a quotient (A regular function on an open subset of a classical affine variety).

[F4]

Regular functions admit pointwise algebra operations (Classical regular functions satisfy locality and unique gluing).

[F5]

k(X) is the fraction field of the domain A (The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety).

[F6]

Polynomial zero loci are Zariski closed (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For sOX(U), choose a nonempty quotient neighbourhood WU with s=a/b and b nowhere zero on W. Then b0 in A, so a/bk(X). If s=c/d on another nonempty quotient neighbourhood W, F1 says WW is nonempty dense. There adbc=0 pointwise. Its zero locus is closed, so it vanishes on X, and F2 gives ad=bc in A. F5 therefore identifies the two fractions.

F1F2F3F5givenalgebraF6
2.1

Define the image of s to be that uniquely determined fraction. Near a point in a common nonempty quotient neighbourhood for s and t, F4 gives the sum and product by cross multiplication; those are exactly the fraction-field operations. Constants map to themselves, so this is a k-algebra map. If s maps to 0, every local quotient a/b has a=0 by F5 and step 1.1, hence s vanishes on each quotient neighbourhood and therefore on all U. Thus the map is injective.

F3F4F5step 1.1algebra
3.1

If VU is nonempty open, a quotient neighbourhood for sV is also a nonempty open subdomain of U. Step 1.1 shows that it computes the same fraction as s. This proves compatibility with restrictions and with every permitted nonempty quotient presentation.

step 1.1step 2.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3k p. 74; Definition 3.8 p. 61. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For every nonempty affine open U in an affine variety X, restriction gives the canonical identification Frac(OX(U))=k(X). In particular, for f0, k[DX(f)]=k[X]f and Frac(k[DX(f)])=k(X). The identifications commute with further nonempty affine-open restriction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an affine variety X over algebraically closed k, and a nonempty affine open UX. For the principal case, fk[X] is nonzero.

[F1]

Nonempty open section algebras embed in k(X), compatibly with restriction (Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field).

[F3]

An injective map from a domain into a field extends uniquely to its fraction field (Every injective ring map from a domain into a field factors uniquely through its field of fractions).

[F5]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put A=k[X], B=OX(U) and K=k(X). Restriction sends A into B, and the embedding BK of F1 sends each restricted polynomial a to a/1. Thus ABK with these specified maps, and B is a domain as a subring of a field.

F1F2given
2.1

F3 extends BK to an embedding Frac(B)K. Its image contains every a/b for a,bA, b0, since AB. Such fractions exhaust K by F2, so this extension is surjective and is the claimed isomorphism.

F2F3step 1.1
3.1

For U=D(f), F4 and F5 identify B with the affine coordinate ring Af, so step 2.1 is the asserted principal-open identification. For a further nonempty affine open V, both restriction embeddings into K agree on sections by F1; their extensions agree on every ratio by the uniqueness in F3.

F1F3F4F5step 2.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3k p. 74 and Proposition 3.32 p. 71. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A rational map as an equivalence class of morphisms on nonempty opens

Definition

For affine varieties X,Y, a representative of a rational map XY is a pair (U,ϕ) with UX nonempty open and ϕ:UY a morphism. Two pairs represent the same rational map when their maps agree on some nonempty open subset of their common domain. A rational map is an equivalence class for this relation; its equivalence-relation well-definedness is supplied by The rational-map relation is transitive . The domain of a representative need not be all of X.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5l p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The rational-map relation is transitive

Statement

The relation used to define rational maps between affine varieties is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, hence is an equivalence relation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Affine varieties X,Y over algebraically closed k, and representatives (Ui,ϕi) with nonempty open domains in X.

[F1]

Representatives have nonempty open domains, and equivalence is agreement on some nonempty open (A rational map as an equivalence class of morphisms on nonempty opens).

[F2]

Finite intersections of nonempty opens of X are nonempty (Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A representative (U,ϕ) agrees with itself on the nonempty open U, proving reflexivity. If two maps agree on a nonempty open W, reversing the equality on that same W proves symmetry.

F1given
2.1

If ϕ1=ϕ2 on a nonempty open W and ϕ2=ϕ3 on a nonempty open V, F2 makes WV nonempty open in X. All three maps are defined there, and equality of their values gives ϕ1=ϕ3 there. This is the required transitivity witness by F1.

F1F2given

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5l p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The candidate domain of a rational map

Definition

For a rational-map class Φ:XY, define its candidate domain by D(Φ)=(U,ϕ)ΦU. It is open and nonempty because every representative domain is open and the class contains a representative. At this point the definition is only a union of domains; it asserts neither a glued map nor maximality.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5l p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Dominant classical morphisms and rational maps

Definition

A morphism ϕ:UY from a nonempty open in an affine variety to an affine variety is dominant when ϕ(U)=Y. A rational map is dominant when one representative is dominant. This does not depend on the representative. Indeed, if ϕ is dominant and WU is nonempty open, then for each nonempty open TY, ϕ1(T) is a nonempty open in U by A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets and dominance. It meets W by Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense, so ϕ(W) meets every such T, proving ϕW dominant. If two representatives agree on a nonempty common open, restricting a dominant one to that open gives a dense image contained in the image of the other. Thus every representative is dominant. Conversely, if any restriction is dominant, the original image contains a dense subset and is dominant.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.34 p. 72 and §§5k–l pp. 116–117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain

Statement

Let U,V be nonempty opens of an affine variety X, and let ϕ:UY, ψ:VY be morphisms to an affine variety. If they agree on a nonempty open subset of UV, they agree on all of UV. More generally agreement on any subset dense in their common domain suffices.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Affine varieties X,Y over algebraically closed k, nonempty opens U,VX, and morphisms ϕ:UY, ψ:VY agreeing on a dense subset of UV or on a nonempty common open.

[F1]

A nonempty open of an irreducible variety is dense, and finite such intersections are nonempty (Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense).

[F2]
[F3]

A regular function on an open source has closed zero set (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Set W=UV. For target coordinates y1,,ym, each difference rj=yjϕyjψ restricted to W is regular, so E=j{rj=0} is closed in W. Since points of Ykm are determined by their coordinates, E is exactly the equalizer.

F2F3given
2.1

If the maps agree on a subset dense in W, its containing closed set E is all W. In particular any nonempty open of W is dense there by F1 (or by intersecting nonempty opens of X), so the nonempty-open hypothesis suffices. If m=0, the intersection defining E is the whole W and the same conclusion holds.

F1step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Lemma 5.6 and Proposition 5.8, pp. 102–103. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover

Statement

For an open U of an affine variety X and an open cover U=iUi, compatible morphisms ϕi:UiY to a fixed affine target glue uniquely to a morphism ϕ:UY.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An affine variety X over algebraically closed k, an open cover U=iUi of an open UX, an affine target Y, and morphisms ϕi:UiY agreeing on every overlap.

[F1]

Compatible regular functions on a cover glue uniquely (Classical regular functions satisfy locality and unique gluing).

[F2]

A set map to an affine target is a morphism when global regular functions pull back regularly (A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Compatibility means ϕi(x)=ϕj(x) for every point of each overlap. Thus the union of their graphs is a function ϕ:UY restricting to each ϕi. Every value is in Y because it is the value of a local map into Y. For empty U and the empty cover this is the empty graph.

given
2.1

If sOY(Y), the functions sϕi are regular by F2 and agree on overlaps. F1 makes their glued function regular, and pointwise it is sϕ. Hence F2 makes ϕ a morphism. Any map with the required restrictions equals the same graph union, proving uniqueness.

F1F2step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.9 p. 61 and §5d pp. 103–104. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A rational map to an affine target has a unique maximal open domain

Statement

The candidate domain of a rational map Φ:XY with affine target supports a unique morphism restricting to every representative. It is a representative of Φ, and is the unique maximal representative domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational-map class Φ:XY for affine varieties over algebraically closed k.

[F1]

The candidate domain is the union of all representative domains (The candidate domain of a rational map).

[F2]

Equivalence of representatives is an equivalence relation (The rational-map relation is transitive).

[F4]

Compatible morphisms on an open cover glue uniquely (Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Any two representatives belong to the same equivalence class, so F2 supplies agreement on a nonempty common open. F3 extends this to their whole overlap. Thus the representatives form a compatible open cover of the candidate domain D from F1. F4 glues them to a unique morphism ϕD:DY.

F1F2F3F4given
2.1

The set D is nonempty open, and its glued map agrees with any given representative on that representative’s nonempty domain. Thus (D,ϕD) belongs to Φ. Every representative domain is contained in D by its definition. Consequently D is maximal and any other maximal representative domain must equal D; F4 gives uniqueness of the map there as well.

F1F4step 1.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5l p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Dominant rational maps compose on nonempty open domains

Statement

Dominant rational maps between affine varieties compose to a well-defined dominant rational map. Representatives ϕ:UY and ψ:VZ compose on W=Uϕ1(V). Composition is independent of representatives, associative, and has identity rational maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Affine varieties X,Y,Z over algebraically closed k and dominant rational maps represented by ϕ:UY and ψ:VZ. For associativity take a third dominant map represented by χ:TQ.

[F1]

Dominance is independent of representatives and survives nonempty open restriction (Dominant classical morphisms and rational maps).

[F2]

Morphisms are continuous and pull back local regular functions (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

[F3]

Equality on a nonempty open defines equality of rational maps (The rational-map relation is transitive).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Because ϕ is dominant and V is nonempty open, W=ϕ1(V) is nonempty; by F2 it is open in U and hence X. Local pullback in F2 shows ψϕ is a morphism there. For a nonempty open TZ, ψ1(T) is a nonempty open of V, hence of Y, and dominance of ϕ gives a point of W mapping into it. Thus the composite meets every nonempty T and is dominant.

F1F2given
1.2

If ϕ,ϕ agree on a nonempty open E and ψ,ψ agree on a nonempty open H, F1 makes ϕE dominant. Therefore Eϕ1(H) is nonempty open, contained in both composite domains. On it the two composite values agree by substitution. F3 identifies the resulting rational maps, proving representative independence.

F1F2F3given
2.1

For a third dominant representative χ:TQ, both parentheses are defined on Uϕ1(Vψ1(T)). The inner inverse image is nonempty open by dominance of ψ, and its inverse image under ϕ is nonempty open by dominance of ϕ. On this domain χ(ψ(ϕ(x))) is the value for both parentheses. F3 and step 1.2 prove associativity. Identity maps have full domain and dense image, and their composites restrict to the original representative, hence give identity classes.

F1F2F3step 1.2

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5k–l pp. 116–117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. A dominant rational map Φ:XY of affine varieties induces a canonical injective k-homomorphism Φ:k(Y)k(X). It agrees with pullback of regular functions wherever defined, is independent of representatives, preserves identities, and reverses composition of dominant rational maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, affine varieties X,Y over algebraically closed k, and a dominant rational map Φ:XY.

[F1]

Function fields are fraction fields of coordinate domains (The function field of an irreducible classical affine variety).

[F2]

Regular functions on a nonempty open embed faithfully into the ambient function field (Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field).

[F3]

Dominant maps have dense images and remain dominant on nonempty open restrictions (Dominant classical morphisms and rational maps).

[F4]

An injective domain map to a field extends uniquely to an injective map of fraction fields (Every injective ring map from a domain into a field factors uniquely through its field of fractions).

[F5]

Dominant rational maps compose independently of representatives (Dominant rational maps compose on nonempty open domains).

[F6]

Morphisms pull back regular functions on target opens (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

[F7]

Polynomial functions identify faithfully with coordinate-ring elements (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

[F8]

The zero set of a polynomial function is closed (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Take a representative ϕ:UY. Pullback maps B=k[Y] into OX(U), and F2 embeds the latter into K=k(X). If b has zero image, F2 says bϕ is the zero function on U. Its closed zero locus in Y contains the dense image of ϕ, so b vanishes everywhere on Y and is zero as a coordinate function. Thus the composite BK is injective and fixes k.

F1F2F3givenF7F8
2.1

F4 extends that injection uniquely to Φ:k(Y)K by a/bϕ(a)/ϕ(b). Here b0 has nonzero pullback by step 1.1, so the quotient is defined. If two representatives agree on a nonempty open, each pulled-back coordinate function agrees there; restriction compatibility and injectivity in F2 make their images in K equal. Uniqueness in F4 then identifies their field maps.

F2F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

Let s be regular on a nonempty target open W, with a quotient expression s=a/b on a nonempty subopen. By F3 the inverse image of that subopen is nonempty open. F6 pulls s back regularly there, and its value is (aϕ)/(bϕ). F2 identifies this fraction with the field element in step 2.1. By restriction compatibility, this also proves agreement on the whole nonempty inverse-image domain.

F2F3F6step 2.1algebra
4.1

For a composable dominant rational map Ψ:YZ, F5 supplies a nonempty composition domain. For a coordinate function c on Z, substitution there gives c(ψϕ)=(cψ)ϕ. Step 3.1 identifies the right side with Φ(Ψ(c)). F2 gives equality in k(X), and F4 extends it from coordinate-ring elements to all fractions. Thus (ΨΦ)=ΦΨ. Identity pullback fixes every fraction.

F2F4F5step 3.1algebra

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5k and Proposition 5.38, pp. 116–117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Dominant rational maps to an affine variety correspond to field embeddings

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For affine varieties X,Y, pullback is a natural bijection between dominant rational maps XY and k-field embeddings k(Y)k(X). The inverse is defined on a nonempty principal open by a common denominator for the images of finitely many coordinate generators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and affine varieties X,Y over algebraically closed k. The reverse construction starts with an injective field homomorphism σ:k(Y)k(X) fixing k.

[F1]

Dominant rational maps have functorial injective field pullbacks (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially).

[F2]

D(d), for d nonzero, is affine with coordinate ring A_d (Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety).

[F3]

Algebra maps of coordinate rings give unique affine morphisms (Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).

[F4]

Nonempty affine opens have the ambient function field (The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open).

[F5]

A proper closed subset of Y has a vanishing ideal strictly larger than I(Y) (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F6]

Open-source morphisms with dense agreement agree on the common domain (Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain).

[F7]

Open regular sections embed faithfully and compatibly in the function field (Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field).

[F8]

Nonempty open subsets of an affine variety have nonempty intersection (Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let σ:k(Y)k(X) fix k. Put A=k[X] and B=k[Y]=k[y1,,ym]. Write σ(yi)=ai/bi with ai,biA and bi0. The finite product d=ibi is nonzero since A is a domain; for m=0 put d=1. Each bi is invertible in Ad with inverse (jibj)/d, so σ(B)Ad. F2 and F3 realize this algebra map as ϕ:D(d)Y.

F2F3givenalgebra
2.1

If the image of ϕ were contained in a proper closed CY, F5 would give a polynomial function 0bB vanishing on C: choose an element of I(C)I(Y). Then the coordinate dictionary makes σ(b)=ϕ(b)=0 in Ad, hence in k(X), contrary to injectivity of σ. Thus ϕ is dominant. F4 identifies the source field with k(X); F1 and the equality on B show its field pullback equals σ on every ratio.

F1F3F4F5step 1.1
3.1

If two dominant rational maps have the same field pullback, take representatives on U and V. Their pullbacks of each y_i agree as elements of k(X), so the faithful open-section embedding F7 makes their values agree on UV. This intersection is nonempty by F8, hence the representatives determine the same rational map. Conversely equal rational maps have equal pullbacks by F1. Thus step 2.1 proves surjectivity and this argument proves injectivity.

F1F6step 2.1F7F8
4.1

Finally F1 gives identity preservation and reversal of composition, so the bijection is natural with respect to dominant rational composition. This construction asserts a dense image, and does not require an image-constructibility theorem.

F1step 3.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 5.38 p. 117; Proposition 3.34(a) p. 72. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register

Definition

Under AC for the affine-coordinate and principal-open interfaces, an integral classical prevariety over k is a nonempty irreducible topological space X equipped with a finite cover by open charts Ui homeomorphic to classical affine varieties, whose transition maps and inverse transition maps on overlaps are locally regular. The atlas is part of the data. On any open WX, a function s:Wk is regular if in each chart it is regular on WUi. A map is a morphism if it is continuous and pulls back regular functions on every target open to regular functions on its inverse image. Equivalently it passes this test locally in source and target charts. An integral classical variety is such a prevariety satisfying the separation axiom: the equalizer of any two morphisms from an affine variety into X is closed. An affine open is an open subset isomorphic, with these functions, to an affine variety.

The chartwise tests are invariant under compatible refinement: on an overlap, A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets shows that locally regular transition maps pull local quotient functions back to regular functions, and Classical regular functions satisfy locality and unique gluing transfers the test in both directions. More explicitly, if a continuous map passes the affine-chart test, then for any target section on W and any source point over W, a target chart and a source chart give a neighbourhood where its pullback is regular. Locality makes the pullback regular on the whole inverse image. The converse is restriction of the global test. Affine targets satisfy the stated separation axiom: choose their finitely many coordinate functions; the equalizer is the intersection of the closed zero sets of the pulled-back coordinate differences. Thus a single affine chart gives an example of an integral classical variety. No theorem constructing a glued space from unspecified charts is asserted.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Definitions 5.2, 5.7 and Proposition 5.4, pp. 100–102. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Compatible affine charts of an integral classical variety have one function field

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. All nonempty affine charts and all nonempty affine opens of an integral classical variety X have canonically isomorphic fraction fields. These comparisons satisfy the cocycle identity on triple intersections and commute with restriction and isomorphisms. The resulting field is denoted k(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an integral classical variety X over algebraically closed k with a compatible affine atlas, and nonempty affine opens of X.

[F1]

Transition maps identify the regular functions on chart overlaps (Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register).

[F2]

Two nonempty opens of an irreducible space meet, and every nonempty open remains irreducible (Irreducibility is equivalent to the nonempty-open intersection criterion).

[F3]

Principal opens form a basis in each affine chart (Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection).

[F4]

Nonempty principal opens of a chart are affine (Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety).

[F5]

An affine variety and a nonempty affine open have the same function field (The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open).

[F6]

Equality of sections on a nonempty open determines equality of the associated fractions (Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let U,V be two nonempty affine opens of X. Their overlap is nonempty by F2. F3 supplies a nonempty principal open WUV in U. By F4 it is affine, and F1 identifies its locally regular structure with that inherited from V. Thus W is also an affine open of V. F5 identifies both k(U) and k(V) with k(W), defining a comparison cUV:k(U)k(V).

F1F2F3F4F5given
2.1

For another choice W, the intersection WW is nonempty open in U. Choose a nonempty principal open T of U in that intersection. It is affine with the inherited structure in W and W. F5 says all field comparisons are restriction maps, and F6 says two fraction values that agree after restriction are equal. Both candidate comparisons therefore agree after passing to k(T), an isomorphic field, so they are equal.

F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1
3.1

For three nonempty affine opens U,V,Z, choose a nonempty principal open T of U inside UVZ, possible by applying F2 twice and then F3. By step 2.1 it may be used in every pairwise comparison. All three identifications then pass through k(T), so cVZcUV=cUZ, cUU is the identity, and cVU=cUV1. Restrictions commute by the same construction. An isomorphism of varieties carries common affine opens and their regular-function restrictions to common affine opens; its pullbacks commute pointwise with restrictions and hence with their field extensions. This proves compatibility with isomorphisms and defines a single field independent of the chosen chart.

F1F2F3F5step 1.1step 2.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, 3k p. 74, 5.10 p. 103, §5k p. 116. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical varieties

Definition

Assume AC for the function-field and affine-atlas interfaces used here. For affine varieties, a dominant rational map Φ:XY is birational if there is a dominant rational map Ψ:YX with ΨΦ=idX and ΦΨ=idY as rational-map classes. Composition here is Dominant rational maps compose on nonempty open domains, the proved composition on nonempty inverse-image domains. For integral classical varieties equipped with compatible affine atlases, birational equivalence means the existence of isomorphic nonempty open subsets. The following theorem identifies this with the inverse-rational-map definition in the affine case and with a k-isomorphism of their function fields.

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5l p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Classical integral varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic over k

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. Two integral classical varieties over algebraically closed k are birationally equivalent exactly when their function fields are isomorphic over k. For affine varieties this is also equivalent to the existence of mutually inverse dominant rational maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and integral classical varieties X,Y over the same algebraically closed field k, equipped with compatible affine atlases.

[F1]

Field embeddings correspond bijectively to dominant rational maps of affine varieties (Dominant rational maps to an affine variety correspond to field embeddings).

[F2]

Pullback reverses composition and preserves identities (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially).

[F3]

Rational agreement on a nonempty open extends over the common domain for affine targets (Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain).

[F4]

All nonempty affine opens of an integral variety have canonically the ambient field (Compatible affine charts of an integral classical variety have one function field).

[F5]

Charts and their compatible affine subopens are open in the whole variety (Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register).

[F6]

Birational equivalence for integral varieties means isomorphic nonempty opens (Birational maps and birational equivalence of classical varieties).

[F7]

Principal opens form a basis in an affine chart (Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection).

[F8]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

First let X,Y be affine and let σ:k(Y)k(X) be a k-isomorphism. F1 gives dominant rational maps Φ:XY and Ψ:YX for σ and σ1. F2 makes the pullbacks of their composites identity embeddings, and injectivity of the bijection in F1 forces both composites to be identity rational maps. Conversely mutually inverse dominant rational maps give inverse k-field embeddings by F2.

F1F2given
2.1

Choose representatives ϕ:UY and ψ:VX of the inverse maps. Set U0=Uϕ1(V) and V0=Vψ1(U). Dominance makes both nonempty open. Their compositions agree rationally with the identities; F3 extends those identities over all U0 and V0. If xU0, put y=ϕ(x). Then yV and ψ(y)=xU, so yV0. Conversely if yV0, x=ψ(y)U and ϕ(x)=yV, so xU0. Thus the restrictions U0V0 and V0U0 are inverse morphisms. This produces the required nonempty open isomorphism.

F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

Now let X,Y have compatible integral affine atlases and let their fields be k-isomorphic. Choose one nonempty affine chart in each. F4 transfers the field isomorphism to their chart fields, and steps 1.1–2.1 give isomorphic nonempty opens in these charts. By F5 these opens are open in the whole X and Y, so F6 makes X,Y birationally equivalent.

F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Conversely suppose h:UV is an isomorphism of nonempty opens of X,Y. Take a point x of U, a chart A containing x and a chart B containing h(x). The open UAh1(B) contains x. F7 and F8 give a nonempty principal affine open W of A in it. Its image h(W) is open in Y and is affine via the isomorphism with W; its regular functions are identified with those on W. Taking fractions and applying F4 identifies k(X) with k(W), then with k(h(W)), then with k(Y), all over k. This proves the reverse direction and, together with steps 1.1–3.1, all claimed equivalences.

F4F5F7F8given

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.36 p. 74 and Proposition 5.39 p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources