How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rational map to an affine target has a unique maximal open domain
Statement
The candidate domain of a rational map with affine target supports a unique morphism restricting to every representative. It is a representative of , and is the unique maximal representative domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A rational-map class for affine varieties over algebraically closed .
The candidate domain is the union of all representative domains (The candidate domain of a rational map).
Equivalence of representatives is an equivalence relation (The rational-map relation is transitive).
Equivalent maps agree on their entire common domain (Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain).
Compatible morphisms on an open cover glue uniquely (Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover).
Proof
Any two representatives belong to the same equivalence class, so F2 supplies agreement on a nonempty common open. F3 extends this to their whole overlap. Thus the representatives form a compatible open cover of the candidate domain D from F1. F4 glues them to a unique morphism .
The set D is nonempty open, and its glued map agrees with any given representative on that representative’s nonempty domain. Thus belongs to . Every representative domain is contained in D by its definition. Consequently D is maximal and any other maximal representative domain must equal D; F4 gives uniqueness of the map there as well.
Sources
Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §5l p. 117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.
Depends on
- A rational map as an equivalence class of morphisms on nonempty opens
- The rational-map relation is transitive
- The candidate domain of a rational map
- Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain
- Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, §5l p. 117 (standard reference, not scraped)