How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dominant rational maps to an affine variety correspond to field embeddings
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For affine varieties , pullback is a natural bijection between dominant rational maps and -field embeddings . The inverse is defined on a nonempty principal open by a common denominator for the images of finitely many coordinate generators.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and affine varieties over algebraically closed . The reverse construction starts with an injective field homomorphism fixing .
Dominant rational maps have functorial injective field pullbacks (Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially).
D(d), for d nonzero, is affine with coordinate ring A_d (Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety).
Algebra maps of coordinate rings give unique affine morphisms (Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).
Nonempty affine opens have the ambient function field (The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open).
A proper closed subset of Y has a vanishing ideal strictly larger than I(Y) (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).
Open-source morphisms with dense agreement agree on the common domain (Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain).
Open regular sections embed faithfully and compatibly in the function field (Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field).
Nonempty open subsets of an affine variety have nonempty intersection (Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense).
Proof
Let fix k. Put and . Write with and . The finite product is nonzero since A is a domain; for put . Each is invertible in with inverse , so . F2 and F3 realize this algebra map as .
If the image of were contained in a proper closed , F5 would give a polynomial function vanishing on C: choose an element of . Then the coordinate dictionary makes in , hence in k(X), contrary to injectivity of . Thus is dominant. F4 identifies the source field with k(X); F1 and the equality on B show its field pullback equals on every ratio.
If two dominant rational maps have the same field pullback, take representatives on U and V. Their pullbacks of each y_i agree as elements of k(X), so the faithful open-section embedding F7 makes their values agree on . This intersection is nonempty by F8, hence the representatives determine the same rational map. Conversely equal rational maps have equal pullbacks by F1. Thus step 2.1 proves surjectivity and this argument proves injectivity.
Finally F1 gives identity preservation and reversal of composition, so the bijection is natural with respect to dominant rational composition. This construction asserts a dense image, and does not require an image-constructibility theorem.
Sources
Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 5.38 p. 117; Proposition 3.34(a) p. 72. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.
Depends on
- Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals
- Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open
- Dominant classical morphisms and rational maps
- A rational map to an affine target has a unique maximal open domain
- Dominant maps pull back function fields functorially
- Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety
- Morphisms defined on an open source and agreeing on a dense open agree on their common domain
- The Axiom of Choice
- Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field
- Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, Proposition 5.38 p. 117; Proposition 3.34(a) p. 72 (standard reference, not scraped)