How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dominant classical morphisms and rational maps
Definition
A morphism from a nonempty open in an affine variety to an affine variety is dominant when . A rational map is dominant when one representative is dominant. This does not depend on the representative. Indeed, if is dominant and is nonempty open, then for each nonempty open , is a nonempty open in by A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets and dominance. It meets by Every nonempty open of a classical affine variety is dense, so meets every such , proving dominant. If two representatives agree on a nonempty common open, restricting a dominant one to that open gives a dense image contained in the image of the other. Thus every representative is dominant. Conversely, if any restriction is dominant, the original image contains a dense subset and is dominant.
Sources
Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.34 p. 72 and §§5k–l pp. 116–117. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, Proposition 3.34 p. 72 and §§5k–l pp. 116–117 (standard reference, not scraped)