How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For an affine variety and , with its regular functions is isomorphic to the closed graph Its coordinate ring is canonically , a nonzero domain; hence is affine in this intrinsic realization.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an affine variety over algebraically closed , , and a nonzero element .
A variety has a nonzero domain coordinate ring and conversely (A classical affine variety has a domain coordinate ring, and conversely).
Regular functions on D(f) form A_f (Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization).
Coordinate-ring maps describe affine morphisms (Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms).
A value for T defines a polynomial-ring map (Universal property of : a coefficient homomorphism and the image of determine a unique ring homomorphism).
An annihilated relation permits passage to the quotient (A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring).
A map making f invertible factors through A_f (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
Prime ideals equal the vanishing ideals of their zero loci (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).
Locally regular functions pull back under morphisms (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).
Every global regular function on an affine algebraic set belongs to its coordinate ring (Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring).
Coordinate-ring elements are polynomial functions in the coordinate classes (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).
Proof
In the classes of and are inverses. F6 defines sending to . Conversely F4 and F5 define by , since the relation maps to zero. The composites fix and on one side and send to itself on the other, hence are identities.
By F1, A is a domain. Since , fractions with powers of embed into its fraction field (a zero image forces the numerator zero). Thus , and hence , is a nonzero domain. The polynomial presentation of has prime kernel: the inverse image of 0 under its surjection is proper and satisfies the product test. F7 makes its zero locus precisely and its coordinate ring exactly . F1 therefore makes a variety.
The projection has image , and , , is its set-theoretic inverse. Projection is a morphism by the coordinate dictionary F3. The coordinate pullbacks for q are regular: those of X are polynomial restrictions and the last is , which belongs to F2. Every global regular function on Z is a polynomial in its coordinates by F9 and F10, so q is a morphism as well.
F8 upgrades these maps to pullback on all target opens. Viewing p as a map into the open has the same property, because any section on an open there is a section on the same open in X. Thus p and q are inverse locally regular morphisms. Finally is nonempty: otherwise f is the zero polynomial function, contrary to by F2.
Sources
Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3h pp. 71–72 and Proposition 3.11 pp. 61–62. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.
Depends on
- A classical affine variety has a domain coordinate ring, and conversely
- Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization
- A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety
- Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- Universal property of $R[x]$: a coefficient homomorphism and the image of $x$ determine a unique ring homomorphism
- A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring
- Universal property of localisation: maps that invert $S$ factor uniquely through $S^{-1}R$
- Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals
- A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets
- The Axiom of Choice
- Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring
- Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring
Used by
- A classical affine open subset and its coordinate ring Definition
- Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register Definition
- The affine-line coordinate, local, and function-field dictionary Example
- Compatible affine charts of an integral classical variety have one function field Lemma
- Classical integral varieties are birational exactly when their function fields are isomorphic over k Theorem
- Dominant rational maps to an affine variety correspond to field embeddings Theorem
- The function field is independent of the chosen nonempty principal affine open Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, §3h pp. 71–72 and Proposition 3.11 pp. 61–62 (standard reference, not scraped)