Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every nonempty principal open is a classical affine variety

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For an affine variety X and 0fA=k[X], DX(f) with its regular functions is isomorphic to the closed graph Z={(x,t)X×k:tf(x)=1}. Its coordinate ring is canonically A[T]/(Tf1)Af, a nonzero domain; hence DX(f) is affine in this intrinsic realization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an affine variety X over algebraically closed k, A=k[X], and a nonzero element fA.

[F1]

A variety has a nonzero domain coordinate ring and conversely (A classical affine variety has a domain coordinate ring, and conversely).

[F7]
[F8]

Locally regular functions pull back under morphisms (A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets).

[F9]

Every global regular function on an affine algebraic set belongs to its coordinate ring (Global regular functions on a classical affine variety are its coordinate ring).

[F10]

Coordinate-ring elements are polynomial functions in the coordinate classes (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

In B=A[T]/(Tf1) the classes of T and f are inverses. F6 defines AfB sending a/fr to aTr. Conversely F4 and F5 define BAf by T1/f, since the relation maps to zero. The composites fix A and T on one side and send a/fr to itself on the other, hence are identities.

F4F5F6givenalgebra
2.1

By F1, A is a domain. Since f0, fractions with powers of f embed into its fraction field (a zero image forces the numerator zero). Thus Af, and hence B, is a nonzero domain. The polynomial presentation of B has prime kernel: the inverse image of 0 under its surjection is proper and satisfies the product test. F7 makes its zero locus precisely Z and its coordinate ring exactly B. F1 therefore makes Z a variety.

F1F7step 1.1algebra
3.1

The projection p:ZX has image D(f), and q:D(f)Z, x(x,1/f(x)), is its set-theoretic inverse. Projection is a morphism by the coordinate dictionary F3. The coordinate pullbacks for q are regular: those of X are polynomial restrictions and the last is 1/f, which belongs to F2. Every global regular function on Z is a polynomial in its coordinates by F9 and F10, so q is a morphism as well.

F2F3step 2.1F9F10
4.1

F8 upgrades these maps to pullback on all target opens. Viewing p as a map into the open D(f) has the same property, because any section on an open there is a section on the same open in X. Thus p and q are inverse locally regular morphisms. Finally D(f) is nonempty: otherwise f is the zero polynomial function, contrary to f0 by F2.

F2F8step 3.1

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, §3h pp. 71–72 and Proposition 3.11 pp. 61–62. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources