How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through
Statement
Let be a unital homomorphism of commutative rings such that is a unit for every . There is a unique unital ring homomorphism satisfying , namely
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A multiplicative subset of a commutative ring and a unital ring homomorphism taking every element of to a unit.
Fraction equality means that for some (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Units form a group under multiplication, so products and inverses of units are units and inverses are unique (The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and is a group under multiplication; only in the zero ring).
Localisation arithmetic is and (The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined).
Proof
Define . If , [F1] gives for some . Applying and cancelling the unit yields ; multiplying by proves the definition is independent of representatives.
Using [F3] and the homomorphism laws for , direct calculation shows that preserves addition, multiplication, zero, and one. Also , so .
If is another such homomorphism, then and . Since , uniqueness of inverses gives ; hence for every fraction.
If , the hypothesis says that is a unit of , so is the zero ring. The construction and uniqueness above still apply, with the unique map between zero rings.
Depends on
- The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined
- Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
- Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send $1$ to $1$
- The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and $R^{\times}$ is a group under multiplication; $0 \in R^{\times}$ only in the zero ring
Used by
- A localisation is unique up to a unique isomorphism compatible with the map from R Corollary
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a local ring R is canonically isomorphic to R_mathfrak m at its maximal ideal Corollary
- The total quotient ring of a nondomain need not be a field: Q(ℤ/6)≅ℤ/6 Counterexample
- F[x]₍ₓ₎ is the ring of rational functions defined at 0, with maximal ideal generated by x and residue field F Example
- ℤ₍ₚ₎ consists of rationals with denominator not divisible by p, has maximal ideal pℤ₍ₚ₎, and residue field Fₚ Example
- ℤ[1/6] consists exactly of rationals a/6ⁿ and inverts precisely the primes 2 and 3 Example
- Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets Proposition
- Every injective ring map from a domain into a field factors uniquely through its field of fractions Theorem
- Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S⁻¹R/S⁻¹I≅ bar S⁻¹(R/I) Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 20 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Proposition 10.9.3 (standard reference, not scraped)