How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every injective ring map from a domain into a field factors uniquely through its field of fractions
Statement
Let be an integral domain, a field, and an injective unital ring homomorphism. There is a unique unital ring homomorphism such that for all . It is injective and satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An injective unital ring homomorphism from an integral domain to a field.
Every nonzero element of a field is a unit (Field).
A map that sends every localisation denominator to a unit factors uniquely through the localisation, by the displayed fraction formula (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
The canonical map embeds in ( is a field and embeds the integral domain ).
Proof
If in , injectivity gives , so [F1] makes a unit. Since the denominators defining are exactly the nonzero elements, [F2] gives the unique extension and its formula.
If , multiply by the unit to obtain . Injectivity of gives , hence . Thus is injective.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The CRing Project, Chapter 13: Fields and Extensions (standard reference, not scraped)