The Field of Fractions and Localisation
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 19 results · all verified · 12 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 7 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Abstract Algebra
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
Real Analysis
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Definition
Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S⁻¹R as equivalence classes of fractions
Theorem
The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined
Proposition
Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
Theorem
Universal property of localisation: maps that invert S factor uniquely through S⁻¹R
Corollary
A localisation is unique up to a unique isomorphism compatible with the map from R
Proposition
A fraction r/s is a unit in S⁻¹R exactly when ar∈ S for some a∈ R
Definition
Principal localisation R_f={1,f,f²,…}⁻¹R
Proposition
Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets
Definition
The field of fractions Frac(D)=(D∖{0})⁻¹D of an integral domain
Lemma
Gauss lemma over a UFD
Theorem
Frac(D) is a field and d↦ d/1 embeds the integral domain D
Theorem
Every injective ring map from a domain into a field factors uniquely through its field of fractions
Corollary
Fields of fractions are uniquely isomorphic over their embedded domain
Corollary
For a field F, F(t)=Frac(F[t]) is its rational function field; in particular ℝ(t)=Frac(ℝ[t])
Definition
A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal
Theorem
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of x and 1-x is a unit for every x
Definition
Localisation at a prime ideal: Rₚ=(R setminusp)⁻¹R
Theorem
Rₚ is local with unique maximal ideal pRₚ
Corollary
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a local ring R is canonically isomorphic to Rₘ at its maximal ideal
Corollary
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a local ring has no idempotents other than 0 and 1
Theorem
Ideals of S⁻¹R correspond to S-saturated ideals of R, and prime ideals correspond to primes disjoint from S
Theorem
Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S⁻¹R/S⁻¹I≅ S̄⁻¹(R/I)
Corollary
Rₚ/pRₚcongFrac(R/p) is the residue field at p
Example
F[x]₍ₓ₎ is the ring of rational functions defined at 0, with maximal ideal generated by x and residue field F
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.9: Localization
- The Stacks Project, Proposition 10.9.3
- The CRing Project, Chapter 13, Section 13.1
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.9.8
- The CRing Project, Chapter 13: Fields and Extensions
- Keith Conrad, Eisenstein Criterion and Gauss' Lemma, Theorem 1.3
- Keith Conrad, Eisenstein Criterion and Gauss' Lemma, Theorem 2.1
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.18: Local rings
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.18.3
- The Stacks Project, Lemmas 10.9.16 and 10.17.5
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.17.5
- The Stacks Project, Proposition 10.9.14