How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Field of Fractions and Localisation: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
is canonically isomorphic to
Example
The field of fractions of is canonically isomorphic to by
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard inclusion .
The rationals are the equivalence classes written for integers with (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).
The rationals form a field (The rationals form a field).
An injective ring map from a domain into a field extends uniquely to its field of fractions (Every injective ring map from a domain into a field factors uniquely through its field of fractions).
The integers form a commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring).
A product of two nonzero integers is nonzero (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).
The natural numbers embed injectively in the integers, while and are distinct natural numbers (The naturals embed in the integers, The natural numbers (von Neumann)).
An integral domain is a commutative ring with and no zero divisors (Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors).
Verification
Facts [F4] and [F5] give the commutative-ring and no-zero-divisor clauses for , while [F6] gives ; hence [F7] makes an integral domain. The map from to is injective by the defining equivalence relation in [F1]. Since is a field by [F2], [F3] extends it uniquely to an injective homomorphism with the displayed formula.
Every rational is with by [F1], so the homomorphism is surjective and hence an isomorphism. It fixes each integer, which makes it canonical over .
consists exactly of rationals and inverts precisely the primes and
Example
Inside , Among positive prime integers, exactly and become units in this ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The principal localisation of at and its canonical map into .
The principal localisation at consists of fractions (Principal localisation ).
The field is canonically ( is canonically isomorphic to ).
For an integer prime , implies or (For an integer : is prime if and only if, for all integers and , implies or ).
A map that sends the chosen denominators to units extends uniquely through the localisation (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
A fraction is zero exactly when some denominator annihilates (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Verification
The inclusion sends to a unit, so [F4] gives a map with . If its image is zero, multiplication by the nonzero element in the field gives , and then [F5] makes ; hence the map is injective. Its image is exactly the set displayed in [F1].
The elements and are units because and .
If a positive prime is a unit, then for some , so . The case is impossible because . For , [F3] applied repeatedly to gives or , and primality with positivity forces or .
consists of rationals with denominator not divisible by , has maximal ideal , and residue field
Example
For a positive prime integer , It is local with maximal ideal , and its residue field is canonically .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive prime integer .
The quotient is a field for prime ; every field is a domain; and is a domain exactly when is prime (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field, Every field is a commutative ring with ; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring, is an integral domain if and only if is a prime ideal, For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
Localising at a prime gives a local ring with maximal ideal the extended prime ( is local with unique maximal ideal ).
Its residue field is ( is the residue field at ).
The field of fractions of is ( is canonically isomorphic to ).
A homomorphism that sends all denominators to units factors uniquely through the localisation (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
A localisation fraction is zero exactly when some denominator annihilates (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Localisation at a prime ideal uses the multiplicative set (Localisation at a prime ideal: ).
Verification
Fact [F1] makes a prime ideal, and [F7] says that the denominators in are exactly the integers outside , namely those not divisible by . Such integers are nonzero and hence units in , so [F5] gives a map sending to the same fraction. If its image is zero, multiplication by the nonzero in gives , and [F6] makes in the localisation; thus the map is injective. Its image is exactly the displayed set.
By [F2], the ring is local with maximal ideal . By [F3], its residue field is . Since the latter base ring is already a field by [F1], every fraction satisfies , so its fraction field is canonically itself.
is the ring of rational functions defined at , with maximal ideal generated by and residue field
Example
For a field , This is the ring of rational functions defined at . Its maximal ideal is generated by , and its residue field is canonically .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and the polynomial ring .
Evaluation at is the unique homomorphism fixing and sending to (Universal property of : a coefficient homomorphism and the image of determine a unique ring homomorphism).
For , one has exactly when divides (Factor theorem over a commutative ring).
A quotient by an ideal is a field exactly when the ideal is maximal ( is a field if and only if is a maximal ideal).
Localising at a prime yields a local ring with the extended prime as maximal ideal, and its residue field is the fraction field of the quotient domain ( is local with unique maximal ideal , is the residue field at ).
The rational function field is (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular ).
Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime (Every maximal ideal of a commutative ring is prime).
A homomorphism that sends every denominator to a unit factors uniquely through the localisation (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
A localisation fraction is zero exactly when some denominator annihilates (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Localisation at a prime ideal uses the multiplicative set (Localisation at a prime ideal: ).
Verification
By [F1] and [F2], evaluation at has kernel and is onto. Explicitly, is well defined and has inverse , so . Thus [F3] makes maximal, and [F6] makes it prime.
By [F9], the denominators are the elements outside , which are exactly the polynomials with by [F2]. They are nonzero and hence units in by [F5], so [F7] gives a map from the localisation to sending to the same fraction. If its image is zero, then because [F5] embeds the domain in its fraction field, and [F8] makes in the localisation. The map is therefore injective, and its image is precisely the displayed fractions, which are exactly those admitting a representative with denominator nonzero at .
By [F4], the maximal ideal is , and the residue field is . Every nonzero denominator in the field is already invertible, so and the last fraction field is canonically .
If , localisation collapses: is the zero ring
Statement refuted
Localising a nonzero ring always produces a nonzero ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero commutative ring and a multiplicative subset containing .
A fraction is zero exactly when for some (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Counterexample
Let be any nonzero commutative ring and let be multiplicative with , for example . For every , choose . Then , so [F1] gives .
Thus has one element and is the zero ring, refuting the statement even though itself is nonzero.
Outside a domain, the nonzero elements need not be multiplicative: in
Statement refuted
For every nonzero commutative ring , the subset is multiplicative and can be used to define a field of fractions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient ring .
A multiplicative subset must be closed under products (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
The ring is the quotient ring (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
The field-of-fractions construction at all nonzero elements is defined for integral domains (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
Counterexample
In , the classes of and are nonzero, but their product is the class of , hence zero.
Therefore is not closed under multiplication and is not multiplicative by [F1]. This shows why the domain hypothesis in [F3] cannot be removed.
Localising at a zero divisor need not be injective: inverting in kills
Statement refuted
Every localisation map is injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient ring and the subset .
The kernel of a localisation map consists of the elements annihilated by some denominator (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
The ring is with congruence-class arithmetic (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
Counterexample
In , let , the multiplicative set generated by the class of because . The class of is nonzero, while .
Since the denominator annihilates , [F1] gives in . Thus the localisation map kills a nonzero element and is not injective.
The total quotient ring of a nondomain need not be a field:
Statement refuted
The total quotient ring of every nonzero commutative ring is a field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient ring . By definition, a regular element has trivial annihilator, and the total quotient ring is the localisation at all regular elements.
Units form a group, and a map already taking all denominators to units extends uniquely through localisation (The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and is a group under multiplication; only in the zero ring, Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
The ring has congruence-class arithmetic (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
In a field, every nonzero element is a unit (Field).
Counterexample
In , the class is not regular because it annihilates ; the classes are nonzero zero divisors; and are units and hence regular. Thus the regular elements are exactly .
Since the identity map of already sends every element of to a unit, [F1] gives an inverse to the localisation map, so .
The nonzero class of is not a unit because every product is even modulo and cannot equal . Hence , and therefore , is not a field by [F3].
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.