How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Outside a domain, the nonzero elements need not be multiplicative: in
Statement refuted
For every nonzero commutative ring , the subset is multiplicative and can be used to define a field of fractions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient ring .
A multiplicative subset must be closed under products (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions).
The ring is the quotient ring (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
The field-of-fractions construction at all nonzero elements is defined for integral domains (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
Counterexample
In , the classes of and are nonzero, but their product is the class of , hence zero.
Therefore is not closed under multiplication and is not multiplicative by [F1]. This shows why the domain hypothesis in [F3] cannot be removed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.9: Localization (standard reference, not scraped)