How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Localising at a zero divisor need not be injective: inverting in kills
Statement refuted
Every localisation map is injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient ring and the subset .
The kernel of a localisation map consists of the elements annihilated by some denominator (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
The ring is with congruence-class arithmetic (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
Counterexample
In , let , the multiplicative set generated by the class of because . The class of is nonzero, while .
Since the denominator annihilates , [F1] gives in . Thus the localisation map kills a nonzero element and is not injective.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.9: Localization (standard reference, not scraped)