Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rp/pRpFrac(R/p) is the residue field at p

Statement

For a prime ideal p of a commutative ring R, there is a canonical field isomorphism Rp/pRpFrac(R/p),r/s+pRp(r+p)/(s+p). This quotient is the residue field of the local ring Rp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R and a prime ideal p.

[F1]

Localisation commutes with quotients by the displayed fraction isomorphism (Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S1R/S1ISˉ1(R/I)).

[F2]

The ring Rp is local with maximal ideal pRp (Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp).

[F3]

The quotient R/p is an integral domain because p is prime (R/P is an integral domain if and only if P is a prime ideal).

[F4]

The localisation of a domain at all of its nonzero elements is its field of fractions and is a field (Frac(D) is a field and dd/1 embeds the integral domain D).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [F1] with S=Rp and I=p. The image of S in R/p is exactly (R/p){0}: a class s+p is nonzero exactly when sp.

F1
2.1

By [F3] and [F4], localisation at that image is Frac(R/p) and is a field. The formula is the formula from [F1], while [F2] identifies the source quotient as the residue field of Rp.

F1F2F3F4step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources