How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Support of a tensor product of finite modules is the intersection of the supports
Statement
If and are finitely generated left -modules, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and finitely generated left -modules .
For a finite module, the support is the set of primes containing its annihilator (For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator).
Localisation is naturally tensoring with the localised ring, so (Localisation of modules is extension of scalars).
The ring is local with maximal ideal , and its residue field is ( is local with unique maximal ideal , is the residue field at ).
Tensoring preserves surjections, and nonzero finite-dimensional vector spaces over a field have nonzero tensor product (Tensoring is right exact, with the product basis, and ).
A finitely generated module admits finite generators, and for a positive-size square matrix over a commutative ring one has (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module, For every positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring, ).
Proof
Because and are finite, is finite: if generate and generate , then the tensors generate . If , then [L1] gives . Every element of and every element of annihilates every elementary tensor, so . Thus contains both annihilators, and [L1] gives .
Conversely, let . By [L2], it is enough to prove . Put , , and ; by [L3], is a local ring with residue field .
If is a finite nonzero -module, then . Indeed, if , choose generators of and coefficients with . Writing and , this says . By [L5], . The determinant has the form with , so and therefore is a unit in the local ring . Hence and , a contradiction.
Apply step 1.3 to and . Since lies in both supports, these local modules are nonzero, so the -vector spaces and are nonzero. Tensoring the quotient maps with [L4] gives a surjection , and the target is the same as the tensor product over , hence nonzero by [L4]. Therefore .
Step 2.1 and [L2] give . Together with step 1.1, this proves the support-intersection formula.
Depends on
- For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator
- Localisation of modules is extension of scalars
- $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is local with unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}$
- $R_{\mathfrak p}/\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}\cong\operatorname{Frac}(R/\mathfrak p)$ is the residue field at $\mathfrak p$
- $R^m\otimes_RR^n\cong R^{mn}$ with the product basis, and $\dim_F(V\otimes_FW)=\dim_FV\,\dim_FW$
- Tensoring is right exact
- For every positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring, $A\operatorname{adj}(A)=\operatorname{adj}(A)A=\det(A)I$
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Proposition 13.30 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.40.9 (standard reference, not scraped)