Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tensoring is right exact

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, let

AfBgC0

be an exact sequence of R-modules, and let N be an R-module. Then

ARNf1BRNg1CRN0

is exact. Thus tensoring preserves cokernels and surjections, but no injectivity at the left is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An exact sequence AfBgC0 and an R-module N over a commutative ring R.

[L1]

Exactness means that g is surjective and imf=kerg (Exact sequences and short exact sequences of modules).

[L2]

Module homomorphisms induce tensor homomorphisms with (f1)(an)=f(a)n and functorial composition (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).

[L3]

Balanced pairings induce unique homomorphisms from tensor products (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).

[L4]

An elementary-tensor formula descends exactly when the corresponding pairing is balanced (A formula on elementary tensors defines a homomorphism exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced).

[L5]

For a submodule KX, the quotient module X/K has cosets x+K and its induced scalar action (Quotient module M/N with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).

[L6]

A module homomorphism that kills K factors uniquely through X/K (A module homomorphism vanishing on N factors uniquely through M/N).

[L7]

Tensor products over R carry the scalar action r(xn)=(rx)n (Over a commutative ring, MRN is an R-module with r(mn)=(rm)n=m(rn)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The map g1 is surjective: by [L8], every tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors cn, and [L1] supplies bB with g(b)=c, so cn=(g1)(bn).

givenL1L2L8choose
1.2

Functoriality gives (g1)(f1)=(gf)1=0, so im(f1)ker(g1).

L1L2
2.1

Let Q=(BRN)/im(f1). The image is a submodule because [L2] and [L7] make f1 R-linear. Since g1 kills it, [L6] gives g:QCRN.

step 1.2L2L5L6L7
3.1

For cC and nN, choose any bB with g(b)=c and set q(c,n)=[bn]Q. If b is another lift, then bbkerg=imf by [L1], so [bn]=[bn]; hence q is well defined.

L1step 2.1choose
4.1

The function q:C×NQ is bilinear: lifts of sums may be taken as sums of lifts, scalar multiples as scalar multiples, and the tensor relations give the required equalities. By [L3] and [L4] it induces h:CRNQ.

step 3.1L3L4L7
5.1

For bn, one has hg([bn])=h(g(b)n)=[bn], while for cn and a lift b one has gh(cn)=g([bn])=cn; generators and uniqueness make h and g inverse.

step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1L3
6.1

Since g is an isomorphism, the kernel of g1 is exactly the submodule quotiented out in step 2.1, namely im(f1). Together with step 1.1, this is right exactness.

step 1.1step 2.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 54 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources