Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Field tests for geometric regularity

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let A be a finite-type k-algebra (Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres). Then:

  1. A is geometrically regular over k if and only if A is a regular ring (regular noetherian ring) and A⊗kk′ is regular for every finite purely inseparable field extension k′/k;
  2. if A is geometrically regular over k, then A⊗kK is a regular ring for every field extension K/k, not only for the finitely generated ones appearing in the definition;
  3. conversely, if K/k is a field extension such that A⊗kK is geometrically regular over K, then A is geometrically regular over k.

Clause 1 is the finite purely inseparable test, clause 2 removes the finite generation from the scalar extension, and clause 3 is descent of geometric regularity along the faithfully flat field extension k→K. The zero algebra is regular vacuously and all clauses hold for it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a finite-type k-algebra A, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres: A is geometrically regular over k when A⊗kK is a regular Noetherian ring for every finitely generated field extension K/k; the condition on a single scalar extension is tested at primes, and geometric regularity of A over k does not presuppose that A is regular, which is why clause 1 of the statement carries regularity of A as a separate hypothesis.

[F2]

regular noetherian ring: a commutative Noetherian ring is regular when every prime localisation is a regular local ring, the zero ring being regular vacuously; the maximal-ideal test is proved with the localisation and polynomial-extension theorem.

[F3]

Separable generation after finite purely inseparable extensions: under the Axiom of Choice, for a finitely generated field extension K/k of characteristic p>0 there are finite purely inseparable extensions k′/k and K′/K with K′/k′ separably generated, and in characteristic 0 one may take k′=k, K′=K.

[F4]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: under the Axiom of Choice, localisations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular, and regularity may be tested at maximal ideals.

[F5]

Separating transcendence basis and separably generated extensions: K/k is separably generated when it has a finite transcendence basis t1,…,ts with K/k(t1,…,ts) finite separable.

[F6]

A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple: a finite extension generated by elements all but at most one of which are separable is simple; in particular a finite separable extension is simple.

[F7]

Regularity ascends and descends along a flat local homomorphism: under the Axiom of Choice, for a flat local homomorphism (R,m)→(S,n) of Noetherian local rings: if R and S/mS are regular then S is regular, and if S is regular then R is regular.

[F8]

A nonzero polynomial over a field is separable exactly when its gcd with its derivative is 1: 0≠f∈F[x] is separable if and only if gcd⁡(f,f′)=1.

[F9]

Every nonzero nonunit polynomial over a field factors into irreducible polynomials and For a nonconstant p in F[x], the ideal (p) is maximal and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible: a nonzero nonunit polynomial over a field is a product of irreducibles, and the quotient by a nonconstant polynomial is a field exactly when that polynomial is irreducible.

[F10]

Tensoring is right exact: −⊗RM is right exact, so F[T]/(f)⊗Fκ≅κ[T]/(fˉ) for a field extension κ/F.

[F11]

auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion: under the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular exactly when every finite module over it has finite projective dimension, and then its global dimension equals its dimension.

[F12]

Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring: a nonzero finite-type algebra over a field k is module-finite over a polynomial ring k[z1,…,zd].

[F13]

Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n: an injective integral extension of nonzero commutative rings preserves dimension, and dim⁡k[z1,…,zd]=d.

[F14]

Localisation does not increase Krull dimension: localising a commutative ring does not increase its dimension.

[F15]

Projective dimension of an object and Left and right global dimension of a ring: pd⁡(M) is the infimum of the lengths of projective resolutions of M, and the global dimension of a ring is the supremum of the projective dimensions of its modules.

[F16]

Extension of scalars carries flat modules to flat modules and Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness: extension of scalars along a flat ring map preserves flatness, and localisations are flat.

Proof

1.1

The forward implication of clause 1 is immediate: taking K=k in [F1] exhibits A itself as regular, and every finite purely inseparable k′/k is a finitely generated field extension, so [F1] makes A⊗kk′ regular.

F1F2
1.2

A base-change fact used below: if B is a regular Noetherian k-algebra and K/k is a separably generated field extension, then B⊗kK is regular. Indeed, choose a separating transcendence basis t1,…,ts and put F:=k(t1,…,ts), so that K/F is finite separable by [F5] and K=F(γ) by [F6] with minimal polynomial P∈F[T] satisfying gcd⁡(P,P′)=1 by [F8]. The ring B1:=B⊗kF is a localisation of the polynomial extension B[t1,…,ts], hence regular by [F4]; let q be a prime of B2:=B⊗kK=B1⊗FK and p:=q∩B1, so that (B1)p→(B2)q is a flat local homomorphism of Noetherian local rings whose closed fibre is a localisation of κ(p)⊗FK≅κ(p)[T]/(Pˉ) by [F10]. Reducing the Bezout identity for gcd⁡(P,P′)=1 modulo p shows gcd⁡(Pˉ,Pˉ′)=1, so Pˉ is separable by [F8] and factors into pairwise distinct irreducibles by [F9], whence κ(p)[T]/(Pˉ) is a product of fields and its further localisation is a field, in particular regular; [F7] then makes (B2)q regular. As q was arbitrary, B2 is regular by [F2].

F2F4F5F6F7F8F9F10
2.1

The finite purely inseparable test implies the finitely generated case of clause 1: assume A is regular and A⊗kk′ is regular for every finite purely inseparable k′/k, and let K/k be finitely generated. By [F3] there are finite purely inseparable extensions k′/k and K′/K with K′/k′ separably generated (in characteristic 0 take both extensions trivial). The ring A⊗kk′ is regular by hypothesis, so step 1.2 applied to B:=A⊗kk′ and the separably generated extension K′/k′ makes A⊗kK′=(A⊗kk′)⊗k′K′ regular. Since K′/K is finite purely inseparable, the field extension K→K′ is faithfully flat and local, and for every prime q of A⊗kK and every prime q′ of A⊗kK′ over it the induced map (A⊗kK)q→(A⊗kK′)q′ is a flat local homomorphism of Noetherian local rings with regular target, so [F7] descends regularity; as q was arbitrary, A⊗kK is regular by [F2]. With step 1.1 this proves clause 1, since [F1] defines geometric regularity by the regular rings A⊗kK over finitely generated K/k.

F1F2F3F7step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Arbitrary field extensions. Assume A is geometrically regular over k and let K/k be any field extension, written as the filtered union of its finitely generated subextensions Ki. Then A⊗kK=⋃iA⊗kKi is a filtered union, and each A⊗kKi is regular by clause 1 as proved in step 2.1. Let q be a prime of A⊗kK and put R:=(A⊗kK)q and Ri:=(A⊗kKi)qi with qi:=q∩(A⊗kKi), so that R=⋃iRi is a filtered union of regular local rings. There is a uniform bound on dimensions: for A≠0, if A is module-finite over k[z1,…,zd] by [F12], then base change along k→Ki presents A⊗kKi as a quotient of a finite free Ki[z1,…,zd]-module by [F10], so it is integral over Ki[z1,…,zd] and has dimension d by [F13]; hence dim⁡Ri≤d by [F14]. For A=0 the ring is the zero ring, regular by [F2].

F2F10F12F13F14step 2.1
4.1

The filtered union is regular. In the notation of step 3.1 let M be a finitely generated R-module; presenting M by finitely many generators and relations, all structure constants lie in some stage, so M≅Mi⊗RiR for a finitely generated Ri-module Mi and some i. By [F11] the regular local ring Ri of dimension at most d has gldim⁡Ri=dim⁡Ri≤d, so Mi has a projective resolution of length at most d by [F15]; tensoring it with R, which is flat over Ri because it is a localisation of the flat base change Ri→Ri⊗KiK by [F16], gives an exact sequence of projective R-modules of length at most d (a direct summand of a free module stays such after tensoring), hence pd⁡RM≤d by [F15]. As every finitely generated R-module has finite projective dimension, [F11] makes R regular; therefore A⊗kK is regular by [F2], which is clause 2.

F2F11F15F16step 3.1
5.1

Descent, clause 3. Let K/k be a field extension with A⊗kK geometrically regular over K, and let E/k be a finitely generated field extension; we show A⊗kE is regular. The k-algebra E⊗kK is nonzero, so choose a prime of it and let L be its residue field, a field receiving both E and K for which L/K is a finitely generated field extension. Then A⊗kL=(A⊗kK)⊗KL=(A⊗kE)⊗EL is regular by clause 2, applied over K to the geometrically regular K-algebra A⊗kK; and A⊗kE→A⊗kL is faithfully flat and local at corresponding primes because E→L is a field extension, so [F7] descends regularity to every local ring of A⊗kE, making it regular by [F2]. As E was arbitrary, A is geometrically regular over k by [F1].

F1F2F7step 4.1
6.1

Clause 1 is step 2.1, clause 2 is step 4.1 and clause 3 is step 5.1; the zero algebra is covered by the vacuous regularity of [F2]. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources