How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion
Statement
For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite residue field projective dimension forces depth equals dimension: If the residue field of a nonzero Noetherian local ring has finite projective dimension, then is regular and .
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring of dimension , and for , with for .
local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , , allowing infinity. If this common value is , every -module has projective dimension at most .
auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
Regularity gives through the Koszul computation. Residue-field projective dimension equals global dimension, so this also bounds every module. Conversely finite projective dimension for every finite module applies to , and finite projective dimension for forces regularity. These implications prove the four-way equivalence and the numerical equalities, also for dimension zero.
Over a regular local ring every finite module has finite projective dimension and . Auslander–Buchsbaum therefore makes depth equivalent to projective dimension zero for a nonzero finite module, hence equivalent to freeness. Conversely a nonzero finite free module has the ring depth.
The useful freeness-lifting argument can also be seen directly. If is injective on a finite and is free over , lift a basis to a surjection by Nakayama, with finite kernel . A relation has coefficients divisible by , so it is ; injectivity on implies . Thus , and Nakayama gives . This includes a zero quotient basis, when .
Depends on
- finite residue field projective dimension forces depth equals dimension
- regular local residue field projective dimension dimension
- local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension
- auslander buchsbaum formula
- regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theorem 12.33 and Corollary 12.30, pp.121–123 (standard reference, not scraped)