Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring, let IR satisfy IJ(R), and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If IM=M, then M=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, an ideal IR with IJ(R), and a finitely generated left R-module M with IM=M.

[L1]

An element x lies in J(R) exactly when 1rx is a unit for every rR (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, an element lies in the Jacobson radical exactly when one minus any multiple is a unit).

[L2]

If IM=M for finite M, then (1a)M=0 for some aI (Determinant trick for Nakayama).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L2], choose aI with (1a)M=0. Since aIJ(R), [L1] makes 1a a unit.

L1L2givenchoose
2.1

Multiplying the equality (1a)m=0 by (1a)1 shows m=0 for every mM. Therefore M=0.

step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources