How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal with , and a finitely generated left -module with .
An element lies in exactly when is a unit for every (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, an element lies in the Jacobson radical exactly when one minus any multiple is a unit).
If for finite , then for some (Determinant trick for Nakayama).
Proof
By [L2], choose with . Since , [L1] makes a unit.
Multiplying the equality by shows for every . Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Exercise 10.12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Lemma 3.9 (standard reference, not scraped)