Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line bundles on a principal localization of a regular local ring are trivial

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a regular local ring and f∈R. Every invertible Rf-module is free of rank one.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Regular local rings have finite global dimension equal to their dimension. Finite local modules have finite-rank minimal free resolutions; the d-th syzygy is projective when the projective dimension is at most d. (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings, finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions, Projective dimension at most n iff the nth syzygy is projective)

[F2]

Nakayama's lemma holds for finite modules over local rings, and localization preserves exactness. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma, Localisation of modules is exact)

Proof

Given: AC, R, f, and an invertible Rf-module L.

1.1givenalgebraconstruct

If Rf=0, the assertion is vacuous. Otherwise L is finitely presented: its dual gives finite elements li∈L, λi∈L∨ with ∑iλi(l)li=l for every l, exhibiting L as a direct summand of a finite free module. Choose a finite presentation matrix for L over Rf. Multiply its finitely many columns by powers of f to lift that matrix to R; its cokernel M is finite over R, and Mf≅L.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Let d=dim⁡R. By [F1], a minimal finite-rank free resolution of M has projective d-th syzygy. A finite projective module P over a local ring is free: lift a basis of P/mP, yielding a surjection Rr→P by [F2]; it splits by projectivity, and its kernel is finite with zero reduction modulo m, so it vanishes by [F2]. Truncate the resolution using a finite free module for its last syzygy. Thus M has a bounded resolution by finite free modules. Localization gives such a resolution of L over Rf.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Since L is projective, the surjection from the degree-zero free module splits, making its kernel finite projective. Inductively every subsequent short exact sequence in the localized resolution splits. For a split sequence 0→P→Q→T→0 of finite projective modules of constant ranks, exterior multiplication gives det⁡Q≅det⁡P⊗det⁡T: after any localization choose bases and concatenate them, and the resulting transition determinants multiply, so the local identifications glue independently of the chosen splitting. All these modules have constant ranks, since they are direct summands in the finite free resolution and Rf is a domain. Multiplying the determinant identities with alternating signs gives L=det⁡L≅⨂i(det⁡(Fi)f)(−1)i. Every Fi is free, so the last invertible module is trivial. Consequently L≅Rf. AC is inherited from the resolution and regularity suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources