How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Line bundles on a principal localization of a regular local ring are trivial
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a regular local ring and . Every invertible -module is free of rank one.
Facts & Assumptions
Regular local rings have finite global dimension equal to their dimension. Finite local modules have finite-rank minimal free resolutions; the -th syzygy is projective when the projective dimension is at most . (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings, finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions, Projective dimension at most n iff the nth syzygy is projective)
Nakayama's lemma holds for finite modules over local rings, and localization preserves exactness. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma, Localisation of modules is exact)
Proof
Given: AC, , , and an invertible -module .
If , the assertion is vacuous. Otherwise is finitely presented: its dual gives finite elements , with for every , exhibiting as a direct summand of a finite free module. Choose a finite presentation matrix for over . Multiply its finitely many columns by powers of to lift that matrix to ; its cokernel is finite over , and .
Let . By [F1], a minimal finite-rank free resolution of has projective -th syzygy. A finite projective module over a local ring is free: lift a basis of , yielding a surjection by [F2]; it splits by projectivity, and its kernel is finite with zero reduction modulo , so it vanishes by [F2]. Truncate the resolution using a finite free module for its last syzygy. Thus has a bounded resolution by finite free modules. Localization gives such a resolution of over .
Since is projective, the surjection from the degree-zero free module splits, making its kernel finite projective. Inductively every subsequent short exact sequence in the localized resolution splits. For a split sequence of finite projective modules of constant ranks, exterior multiplication gives : after any localization choose bases and concatenate them, and the resulting transition determinants multiply, so the local identifications glue independently of the chosen splitting. All these modules have constant ranks, since they are direct summands in the finite free resolution and is a domain. Multiplying the determinant identities with alternating signs gives . Every is free, so the last invertible module is trivial. Consequently . AC is inherited from the resolution and regularity suppliers.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Lemma 15.123.1, including corrected K0 argument (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Algebra, regular local finite free resolutions (standard reference, not scraped)