Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions

Statement

Every finite module M over a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m,k) has an augmented resolution F1F0M0 by finite-rank free modules, with di(Fi)mFi1 for i>0. Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

Minimal Free Resolution Over A Local Ring: A finite free resolution FN over local (R,m) is minimal when di(Fi)mFi1 for every i>0.

[F2]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, minimal generators over a local ring are exactly residue-field bases: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let (R,m) be a local ring with residue field k=R/m, and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. A finite generating set x1,,xr of M is minimal if and only if the images of x1,,xr in M/mM form a k-basis. In particular every minimal generating set of M has the same cardinality.

[F3]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a commutative ring, let IR satisfy IJ(R), and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If IM=M, then M=0.

[F4]

Finite generation, ACC, and maximal-condition characterizations of Noetherian modules: For a left R-module M, the following are equivalent: every submodule is finitely generated; every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes; and every nonempty family of submodules has a maximal member. The implication from ACC to the maximal condition uses dependent choice; the other displayed implications are choice-free. See def-noetherian-module.

Proof

1.1

Choose a basis of M/mM and lift it to x1,,xrM. If N=iRxi, then M=N+mM, so the finite module M/N satisfies m(M/N)=M/N. Nakayama gives M=N. Thus the corresponding map F0=RrM is onto. A relation among the xi has all coefficients in m, because their residue classes are independent. Hence K0=ker(F0M)mF0.

F2F3algebra
2.1

Every kernel is finite by Noetherianity. Repeating the same construction on K0 and on each successive kernel produces an exact augmented complex whose differential images lie in the required maximal-ideal multiples. Dependent Choice suffices for the infinite recursive selections; the cited Nakayama results are used with their AC ledger. If a kernel is zero, choose zero modules thereafter; for M=0 choose the zero complex. The bounded case agrees with the prior definition.

F4F3F1step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources