How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions
Statement
Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
Minimal Free Resolution Over A Local Ring: A finite free resolution over local is minimal when for every .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, minimal generators over a local ring are exactly residue-field bases: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a local ring with residue field , and let be a finitely generated left -module. A finite generating set of is minimal if and only if the images of in form a -basis. In particular every minimal generating set of has the same cardinality.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Finite generation, ACC, and maximal-condition characterizations of Noetherian modules: For a left -module , the following are equivalent: every submodule is finitely generated; every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes; and every nonempty family of submodules has a maximal member. The implication from ACC to the maximal condition uses dependent choice; the other displayed implications are choice-free. See def-noetherian-module.
Proof
Choose a basis of and lift it to . If , then , so the finite module satisfies . Nakayama gives . Thus the corresponding map is onto. A relation among the has all coefficients in , because their residue classes are independent. Hence .
Every kernel is finite by Noetherianity. Repeating the same construction on and on each successive kernel produces an exact augmented complex whose differential images lie in the required maximal-ideal multiples. Dependent Choice suffices for the infinite recursive selections; the cited Nakayama results are used with their AC ledger. If a kernel is zero, choose zero modules thereafter; for choose the zero complex. The bounded case agrees with the prior definition.
Depends on
Used by
- betti numbers of a finite local module Definition
- auslander buchsbaum projective dimension one Lemma
- flat local ascent of regularity Lemma
- minimal free resolution differentials land in maximal ideal Lemma
- projective dimension from last nonzero betti number Lemma
- regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Construction before Proposition 12.27, p.120 (standard reference, not scraped)