How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
auslander buchsbaum projective dimension one
Statement
If is a nonzero finite module of projective dimension one over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , then and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
minimal free matrix induces zero on residue ext: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , let be a map between finite free modules all of whose matrix entries lie in . Then for every .
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
Depth as the first nonzero Ext degree: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, and let lie in the Jacobson radical. Then where the infimum of the empty set is .
The long exact Ext sequence in the second variable: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let be abelian with enough projectives and enough injectives, and fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all its objects. For and every , there is a natural exact sequence where ; it is natural in the short exact sequence and contravariantly natural in .
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has a degreewise finite minimal free resolution.
Proof
Choose the minimal resolution supplied by [F5]. Since , [F2] says that its last nonzero term is with and for . Thus it gives a minimal exact sequence . Write . The map on every induced by is zero. If , the injection would be zero with nonzero source, impossible. Hence .
For , the adjacent Ext terms for the free modules vanish, so . At , exactness and the zero map in degree identify with . Thus the first nonzero Ext degree is , proving the depth formula, also for .
Depends on
Used by
- auslander buchsbaum formula Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theorem 1.53, pp.24–25 (standard reference, not scraped)