How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Depth as the first nonzero Ext degree
Statement
Let be Noetherian, let be finite, and let lie in the Jacobson radical. Then where the infimum of the empty set is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ring, module, and ideal in the statement.
Proof
If , depth is infinite by definition. In this case and have disjoint support, so all the displayed Ext groups vanish; this includes .
If , maximal regular sequences exist and the preceding lemma identifies their common length with the first nonzero Ext degree. The definition of depth gives the same length.
Depends on
Used by
- Completion reflects depth Lemma
- Depth drops by one after quotienting by a regular element Lemma
- Radical invariance of first nonzero Ext Lemma
- The left lower bound in the Depth Lemma Lemma
- The middle lower bound in the Depth Lemma Lemma
- The right lower bound in the Depth Lemma Lemma
- Depth equals the maximal regular-sequence length Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Depth and Cohen--Macaulay modules source treatment (standard reference, not scraped)