Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Depth equals the maximal regular-sequence length

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Let R be Noetherian, M≠0 finite, and I an ideal contained in the Jacobson radical with IM≠M. Then every maximal M-regular sequence in I has length depth⁡I(M), and this common integer is the first degree in which Ext⁡R∗(R/I,M) is nonzero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the hypotheses in the statement.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

By lem-maximal-regular-sequences-have-common-length-ext, the length of every maximal regular sequence is the first nonzero Ext degree.

2.1step 1.1∎

The Ext characterization identifies that same degree with depth⁡I(M), proving both assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources