How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
2 · Summary
Embedding dimension and associated graded rings lead to regular parameters, minimal resolutions, the Auslander–Buchsbaum formula, and the homological criterion for regularity. Localization and completion connect these descriptions; Serre’s criterion establishes normality, including the case of rings with zero divisors. Local rings are nonzero and commutative Noetherian; finite modules are finitely generated. The proofs retain the choice hypotheses of their dependencies. Fields occupy dimension zero, and DVRs exclude fields.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
embedding dimension and regular local ring
Definition
For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number
Statement
For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, minimal generators over a local ring are exactly residue-field bases: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a local ring with residue field , and let be a finitely generated left -module. A finite generating set of is minimal if and only if the images of in form a -basis. In particular every minimal generating set of has the same cardinality.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If elements generate , then generate .
Proof
Write . Lift a basis to . Since is finite and , Nakayama gives . If , the same assertion gives .
Any generating tuple of spans its quotient by , so its length is at least . The lifted basis is a minimal generating tuple by the local generator criterion. Thus the least length is .
dimension at most embedding dimension
Statement
Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
Krull's height theorem: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal generated by elements, and let be a prime ideal minimal over . Then .
Proof
Let . The maximal ideal has a generating tuple of length . If , it is zero; then every nonzero element is a unit and is a field of dimension zero.
If , the maximal ideal is minimal over itself, so its height is at most by the height theorem. Every prime chain in a local ring can be extended to end at its maximal ideal; hence .
regular system of parameters
Definition
In a regular local ring of dimension , an ordered minimal generating tuple of is a regular system of parameters. The tuple is empty when . This definition concerns generators of the maximal ideal; the regular-sequence property is a theorem, not part of the definition.
regular system of parameters equivalent basis
Statement
Let be a nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension , and let . Then is a regular system of parameters if and only if its classes form a -basis of . In particular every lift of a cotangent basis in a regular local ring generates and is a system of parameters.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular system of parameters: In a regular local ring of dimension , an ordered minimal generating tuple of is a regular system of parameters. The tuple is empty when . This definition concerns generators of the maximal ideal; the regular-sequence property is a theorem, not part of the definition.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If elements generate , then generate .
Proof
If is a regular system, it minimally generates in a regular ring, whose cotangent dimension is . Its spanning classes therefore form a basis.
Conversely, a basis of length makes the embedding dimension , so is regular. Nakayama lifts the spanning classes to generators of , and no generator can be removed since its class is independent. Their ideal has radical and length , which is exactly the parameter condition. For , Nakayama gives and the empty tuple has the same property.
associated graded polynomial surjection
Statement
Let be nonzero Noetherian local and let lift a basis of . There is a surjective graded -algebra map , determined by , with every variable of degree one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be an -module. The associated graded ring of the -adic filtration is Multiplication is induced by multiplication in : The associated graded module is viewed as a graded -module by
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: If is contained in the Jacobson radical of a commutative ring and is finite with , then .
Proof
The degree-zero part is . On the action of factors through , since . The graded multiplication therefore defines the displayed polynomial map. Altering a representative by changes a product of degrees by , so multiplication and the map are well-defined.
Put . The basis hypothesis says , so the finite module satisfies . Nakayama gives . Expanding products now shows that degree- monomials in the generate over ; reducing coefficients modulo spans the degree- quotient over . Thus every graded component is in the image. When , the same Nakayama argument gives and the map is the identity on .
regular local graded surjection has zero kernel
Statement
For the graded map defined by a cotangent basis in a nonzero Noetherian local ring, if , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
associated graded polynomial surjection: Let be nonzero Noetherian local and let lift a basis of . There is a surjective graded -algebra map , determined by , with every variable of degree one.
The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finite -module, and let be an ideal of definition for . Then the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial has degree
A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain: If is an integral domain, then is an integral domain for every , including .
Proof
If , the map is the identity of . Suppose . If the homogeneous kernel were nonzero, it would contain a nonzero homogeneous polynomial of degree , because the degree-zero map is injective.
Put . Since is a domain, multiplication by injects into . Counting monomials of total degree at most , for , gives . This polynomial has degree : the terms of degree cancel.
The surjection bounds by that count, because its filtration factors are precisely the graded pieces. But its eventual Hilbert–Samuel polynomial has degree and positive leading coefficient (it is eventually positive). A polynomial of degree cannot be bounded by one of degree for all large . Thus no such exists.
associated graded ring of a regular local ring
Statement
If is regular local of dimension , any cotangent basis induces a graded isomorphism . Conversely, if the associated graded ring of a nonzero Noetherian local ring is isomorphic as a graded -algebra to with standard grading, then is regular of dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
associated graded polynomial surjection: Let be nonzero Noetherian local and let lift a basis of . There is a surjective graded -algebra map , determined by , with every variable of degree one.
regular local graded surjection has zero kernel: For the graded map defined by a cotangent basis in a nonzero Noetherian local ring, if , then .
The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finite -module, and let be an ideal of definition for . Then the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial has degree
Proof
In a regular local ring the cotangent dimension equals . The polynomial map is surjective and has zero kernel, hence is the claimed isomorphism.
Conversely, the degree-one component of a supplied graded isomorphism has dimension , so . Its cumulative graded dimensions are , also when , where the count is one. These are the lengths of . The Hilbert–Samuel dimension theorem gives , proving regularity.
regular local hilbert samuel multiplicity one
Statement
For a regular local ring of dimension and every integer , . Consequently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
associated graded ring of a regular local ring: If is regular local of dimension , any cotangent basis induces a graded isomorphism . Conversely, if the associated graded ring of a nonzero Noetherian local ring is isomorphic as a graded -algebra to with standard grading, then is regular of dimension .
Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity as the factorial-scaled leading coefficient: Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finite -module, and let be an ideal of definition for . If , define If , let be the eventual Hilbert-Samuel polynomial from thm-existence-of-hilbert-samuel-polynomial, and let . Because and , Nakayama's lemma makes nonzero for every , so is not the zero polynomial and is defined. The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of with respect to is Equivalently, when and then is the integer scaling the top term.
Proof
The filtration of has factors for . The graded polynomial description identifies their total dimension with the number of monomials in variables of degree at most . Introducing a slack exponent identifies these with -tuples of nonnegative integers summing to , counted by .
The leading coefficient is , so multiplying it by gives multiplicity one. If , the only monomial is , and the constant polynomial has leading coefficient one and . The formula also gives length one at .
regular local domain induction
Statement
Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
associated graded ring of a regular local ring: If is regular local of dimension , any cotangent basis induces a graded isomorphism . Conversely, if the associated graded ring of a nonzero Noetherian local ring is isomorphic as a graded -algebra to with standard grading, then is regular of dimension .
The Krull intersection is the -torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case: The first clause below is choice-free; the second uses the published Jacobson-radical unit criterion and therefore inherits its Axiom-of-Choice boundary. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be a finite -module. Put Then: 1. is exactly the set of elements for which for some ; 2. if , then .
Proof
The maximal-adic filtration is separated by Krull intersection. For each nonzero there is therefore a largest integer with ; its class in degree is nonzero.
For nonzero of orders , their initial classes have nonzero product in the graded polynomial ring, which is a domain: multiplying leading monomials proves this over the field . This product is the class of in , so . The same argument includes , , and dimension zero.
regular local parameter is nonzerodivisor
Statement
In a positive-dimensional regular local ring, every member of a regular system of parameters is a nonzerodivisor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular system of parameters equivalent basis: Let be a nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension , and let . Then is a regular system of parameters if and only if its classes form a -basis of . In particular every lift of a cotangent basis in a regular local ring generates and is a system of parameters.
regular local domain induction: Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
Proof
The class of any member is a member of a cotangent basis and hence is nonzero. In particular .
The ring is a domain, so multiplication by this nonzero is injective. This proves the assertion for every member of the supplied tuple.
regular local quotient by parameter is regular
Statement
Let be regular local of dimension , and let . Then is regular local, of dimension and embedding dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular system of parameters equivalent basis: Let be a nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension , and let . Then is a regular system of parameters if and only if its classes form a -basis of . In particular every lift of a cotangent basis in a regular local ring generates and is a system of parameters.
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Local dimension is the minimal number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical: Let be a finite-dimensional Noetherian local ring of dimension . Then is the least integer for which there exists an -generated ideal with .
Proof
Extend the nonzero class of to a basis of and lift it. The resulting elements generate ; their last images generate the maximal ideal of . Hence . The hypotheses force and .
Let , which is finite by the embedding bound. Lift radical generators of the maximal ideal of . Together with they generate an ideal of with radical , so . Combining proves all the assertions, including the field quotient when .
quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element
Statement
Let be nonzero Noetherian local. If is a nonzerodivisor and is regular, then is regular and . For every nonzerodivisor , . If is regular and , then is regular if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Let be regular local of dimension , and let . Then is regular local, of dimension and embedding dimension .
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Local dimension is the minimal number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical: Let be a finite-dimensional Noetherian local ring of dimension . Then is the least integer for which there exists an -generated ideal with .
Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a left -module. Then the set of zero divisors on is If is finitely generated, this is a finite union.
regular local domain induction: Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. If is minimal in , then
Proof
For a nonzerodivisor , put and . Both dimensions are finite by the embedding bound. Lifting radical generators gives . Every prime chain containing can be extended strictly downwards by a minimal prime of : minimal primes are associated, hence omit by the zero-divisor criterion. Thus , and .
If is regular, lift its maximal-ideal generators and adjoin . This gives , and the embedding bound makes it equality. If were in , cotangent reduction would leave dimension unchanged, giving , contrary to .
In a regular local ring, a nonzero is a nonzerodivisor: the domain property is exactly F5. Thus the preceding implication applies. In the other direction, makes the quotient regular by the parameter-quotient lemma. There is no when the regular ring has dimension zero; in dimension one the regular quotient is a field.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay
Statement
A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local domain induction: Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
regular local parameter is nonzerodivisor: In a positive-dimensional regular local ring, every member of a regular system of parameters is a nonzerodivisor.
regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Let be regular local of dimension , and let . Then is regular local, of dimension and embedding dimension .
Cohen--Macaulay local modules and rings: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a nonzero finite -module. The module is Cohen--Macaulay when The zero module is excluded from this local definition. The local ring is Cohen--Macaulay when it is Cohen--Macaulay as an -module.
Regular Sequence On A Module: Let be a commutative unital ring, let be an -module, and let be a finite ordered sequence in . The sequence is -regular when and multiplication by is injective on it for every , and .
Depth is bounded by support dimension: For every nonzero finite module over a Noetherian local ring , The nonzero hypothesis is essential for this formulation: under the adopted convention , whereas the empty support has no nonnegative Krull dimension.
Depth with respect to an ideal: For a finite module with , is the supremum of the lengths of -regular sequences in ; for a local ring depth means depth with respect to its maximal ideal.
Proof
The ring is a domain. Successively apply the parameter-quotient lemma: after quotients the remaining cotangent classes form a basis, and the quotient is regular of dimension . This starts with and ends with .
At each nonterminal stage the next parameter is a nonzerodivisor. All the quotients are nonzero, so the tuple satisfies the definition of a regular sequence. Its length is , and the depth definition therefore gives ; the support-dimension bound gives . Thus the Cohen–Macaulay definition holds. For , the empty tuple and the field give the same conclusion.
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs
Statement
A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local domain induction: Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
Equivalent characterizations of a DVR: Let be a nonfield domain. The following are equivalent. 1. is a discrete valuation ring. 2. is a Noetherian valuation ring. 3. is a one-dimensional Noetherian local integrally closed domain. 4. is a local principal ideal domain with nonzero maximal ideal.
The Krull intersection is the -torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case: The first clause below is choice-free; the second uses the published Jacobson-radical unit criterion and therefore inherits its Axiom-of-Choice boundary. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be a finite -module. Put Then: 1. is exactly the set of elements for which for some ; 2. if , then .
Proof
If is regular of dimension one, it is a domain and for a nonzero nonunit . Krull intersection gives for any a largest with ; writing , maximality makes a unit.
In a nonzero ideal choose an element with least such exponent . Every other nonzero element has exponent at least , so the ideal is . The zero ideal is principal as well. Thus is a local PID with nonzero maximal ideal, and the stated DVR equivalence applies.
Conversely, a DVR is a nonfield local PID of dimension one. Its maximal ideal is nonzero, and by cancellation in a domain. Therefore its embedding dimension is one and it is regular.
regular local regular quotient ideal is parameter generated
Statement
Let be regular local of dimension and . The following are equivalent: is regular; is generated by an initial part of a regular system of parameters; and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Let be regular local of dimension , and let . Then is regular local, of dimension and embedding dimension .
regular local domain induction: Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
regular system of parameters equivalent basis: Let be a nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension , and let . Then is a regular system of parameters if and only if its classes form a -basis of . In particular every lift of a cotangent basis in a regular local ring generates and is a system of parameters.
Proof
Put . The cotangent space of is and has dimension . Consequently the numerical equality is precisely the definition of regularity of .
If is regular, choose lifting a basis of that subspace and extend their classes to a cotangent basis of . Put . Repeated parameter reduction makes regular of dimension , and the extended tuple is a regular system.
The ring is a domain. If the kernel of were nonzero, any prime chain in would lift to a chain of nonzero primes of , to which can be prepended. Hence , contradicting equality of dimensions. Thus . Conversely, repeated parameter reduction makes every such quotient regular. This includes , when , and , when and the quotient is .
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions
Statement
Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
Minimal Free Resolution Over A Local Ring: A finite free resolution over local is minimal when for every .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, minimal generators over a local ring are exactly residue-field bases: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a local ring with residue field , and let be a finitely generated left -module. A finite generating set of is minimal if and only if the images of in form a -basis. In particular every minimal generating set of has the same cardinality.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Finite generation, ACC, and maximal-condition characterizations of Noetherian modules: For a left -module , the following are equivalent: every submodule is finitely generated; every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes; and every nonempty family of submodules has a maximal member. The implication from ACC to the maximal condition uses dependent choice; the other displayed implications are choice-free. See def-noetherian-module.
Proof
Choose a basis of and lift it to . If , then , so the finite module satisfies . Nakayama gives . Thus the corresponding map is onto. A relation among the has all coefficients in , because their residue classes are independent. Hence .
Every kernel is finite by Noetherianity. Repeating the same construction on and on each successive kernel produces an exact augmented complex whose differential images lie in the required maximal-ideal multiples. Dependent Choice suffices for the infinite recursive selections; the cited Nakayama results are used with their AC ledger. If a kernel is zero, choose zero modules thereafter; for choose the zero complex. The bounded case agrees with the prior definition.
minimal free resolution differentials land in maximal ideal
Statement
For an augmented degreewise finite free resolution over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , minimality means that every positive differential matrix has entries in . Equivalently no positive differential admits a unit pivot, or a nonzero two-term identity direct summand. A unit pivot can be cancelled without changing the resolved module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
Proof
The condition that an image lie in is exactly that all matrix entries lie in , and is basis-independent. Since the complement of consists of units, failure supplies a unit entry. This is the minimality convention of the existence lemma.
Move that entry to the first position, scale it to , and clear its row and column by elementary basis changes. The matrix becomes . The identities force adjacent maps to vanish on or into the isolated coordinates; for the augmentation also vanishes there. Hence these coordinates form the direct summand . Deleting it preserves exactness. Conversely an identity summand cannot have zero residue differential, while every matrix with entries in does.
minimal free resolution reduces to zero differential
Statement
If is a minimal degreewise finite free resolution over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , every differential of the unaugmented complex is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
minimal free resolution differentials land in maximal ideal: For an augmented degreewise finite free resolution over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , minimality means that every positive differential matrix has entries in . Equivalently no positive differential admits a unit pivot, or a nonzero two-term identity direct summand. A unit pivot can be cancelled without changing the resolved module.
The balanced Tor bifunctor: For a right -module , a left -module , and , define to be either for a projective resolution of or for a projective resolution of , identified by the preceding natural balance isomorphism. On maps it uses the homology maps induced by comparison maps; coherence makes this a well-defined covariant bifunctor.
Proof
Every positive differential matrix has entries in . Tensoring with reduces those entries to zero.
Thus the unaugmented residue complex has zero differential in every degree, including its map from degree zero to zero. Its homology in degree is , and it computes . The assertion includes the zero complex.
betti numbers of a finite local module
Definition
For a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring and an integer , its Betti number is . The action factors through , and a degreewise finite free resolution makes this dimension finite. Tor is resolution-independent. This extends the Koszul rank notation: whenever a minimal Koszul resolution exists, the rank formula identifies these numbers with its Koszul Betti numbers. For all Betti numbers are zero.
betti number is rank in minimal resolution
Statement
For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
betti numbers of a finite local module: For a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring and an integer , its Betti number is . The action factors through , and a degreewise finite free resolution makes this dimension finite. Tor is resolution-independent. This extends the Koszul rank notation: whenever a minimal Koszul resolution exists, the rank formula identifies these numbers with its Koszul Betti numbers. For all Betti numbers are zero.
minimal free resolution reduces to zero differential: If is a minimal degreewise finite free resolution over , every differential of the unaugmented complex is zero.
Proof
The residue complex has zero differentials and computes , so this Tor group is .
Its vector-space dimension equals the finite free rank of . By definition this is . This holds in degree zero, in all higher degrees, and for zero terms, including the zero module.
minimal free resolutions unique up to chain isomorphism
Statement
Any two minimal degreewise finite free resolutions of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring are augmentation-preservingly chain-isomorphic, in general noncanonically. In particular their ranks agree in every degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
Projective comparison maps exist: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let be a morphism, and let and be projective resolutions. Then there exists an augmentation-preserving chain map lifting .
Projective comparison maps are unique up to chain homotopy: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Any two augmentation-preserving maps between projective resolutions lifting the same object morphism are chain-homotopic.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
Choose comparison maps and lifting the identity on . Their composites are homotopic to the identities. The cited comparison assertions use DC and supplied resolution data.
After reduction modulo , all differentials vanish, so the homotopy identities become and . The finite ranks agree, also by the Betti rank theorem. Nakayama makes each surjective; equivalently its square matrix has determinant nonzero modulo , hence unit. Its adjugate gives an inverse over . These inverses form a chain map since does. Rank zero causes no difficulty: the unique map between zero modules is invertible.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number
Statement
For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
Projective dimension of an object: Assume projective resolutions are supplied or exist in the relevant class. The projective dimension of is with value if this set is empty. A length-zero projective resolution exists exactly when is projective.
Projective dimension at most n iff the nth syzygy is projective: Let be an abelian category with enough projectives, fix a projective resolution , and let . Then In particular, the condition is independent of the chosen projective resolution.
A finite flat module over a local ring is free: The standard theorem holds over arbitrary local rings; the proof written here is the Noetherian local case. Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite flat -module. Then is free.
Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring: Every projective left or right module over an arbitrary ring is flat on its appropriate side.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
The balanced Tor bifunctor: For a right -module , a left -module , and , define to be either for a projective resolution of or for a projective resolution of , identified by the preceding natural balance isomorphism. On maps it uses the homology maps induced by comparison maps; coherence makes this a well-defined covariant bifunctor.
minimal free resolution reduces to zero differential: Reducing a minimal degreewise finite free resolution modulo gives the zero differential, so .
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
Proof
Choose a minimal degreewise finite free resolution by [F9]. By [F7], the zero differential in [F8] identifies with . Its vanishing and Nakayama give . Exactness then gives (using the augmentation when ), so the truncated complex is a length- free resolution. Also , so Nakayama prevents a restart, and the same argument applies successively in every subsequent degree.
Conversely, if , a projective resolution of length at most computes Tor and gives zero in every degree above . The syzygy criterion also gives a finite free terminating resolution: for its finite projective syzygy is flat and hence free; for apply the same freeness result directly to .
Since , Nakayama gives . The two implications show that the last nonzero degree equals projective dimension when finite; if there is no finite bound, nonzero Betti degrees are unbounded and both sides are infinite.
auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension
Statement
Let be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If , then and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
Proof
The minimal resolution of has last nonzero term by the Betti criterion. Truncating it gives a minimal resolution . If , the initial presentation would make free, contrary to .
The truncated resolution has last nonzero term in degree , so the same criterion gives . For this says that is a nonzero finite free module.
auslander buchsbaum base case free module
Statement
If a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has projective dimension zero, then it is finite free of positive rank and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
Projective dimension of an object: Assume projective resolutions are supplied or exist in the relevant class. The projective dimension of is with value if this set is empty. A length-zero projective resolution exists exactly when is projective.
A finite flat module over a local ring is free: The standard theorem holds over arbitrary local rings; the proof written here is the Noetherian local case. Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite flat -module. Then is free.
Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring: Every projective left or right module over an arbitrary ring is flat on its appropriate side.
Depth as the first nonzero Ext degree: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, and let lie in the Jacobson radical. Then where the infimum of the empty set is .
Proof
Projective dimension zero means projective. A projective module is flat, and the finite-flat theorem for Noetherian local rings makes finite free, say . Nonzeroness forces .
Ext into a finite direct sum is the finite direct sum of the corresponding Ext groups, as follows by applying Hom to a resolution. Thus has the same first nonzero degree as . The Ext-depth criterion gives equality of depths, including depth zero.
minimal free matrix induces zero on residue ext
Statement
For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , let be a map between finite free modules all of whose matrix entries lie in . Then for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
The balanced Ext bifunctor: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let be an abelian category with enough projectives and enough injectives, and fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects of . For each , define to mean either or , identified by the natural comparison isomorphism already proved. This notation is justified by the comparison theorem, its independence of comparison data, its two-variable naturality, and its change-of-resolution cocycle law; it is not a definition by equality of the two complexes.
Module categories have enough injectives: Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every unital ring and every left -module , there is an injective left -module and a monomorphism . Thus left -modules have enough injectives. For commutative , one explicit functorial target is where ; the embedding is . Here is a left -module by .
Proof
Choose an injective resolution of . Finite direct sums and are injective resolutions of the free modules. The same coefficient matrix defines a chain map between them extending . Enough injectives is used with AC, and the balanced Ext convention with its supplied data and DC.
For and , . Consequently that matrix induces the zero map on every term of . It therefore induces zero on cohomology in every degree. This includes and or .
auslander buchsbaum projective dimension one
Statement
If is a nonzero finite module of projective dimension one over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , then and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
minimal free matrix induces zero on residue ext: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , let be a map between finite free modules all of whose matrix entries lie in . Then for every .
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
Depth as the first nonzero Ext degree: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, and let lie in the Jacobson radical. Then where the infimum of the empty set is .
The long exact Ext sequence in the second variable: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let be abelian with enough projectives and enough injectives, and fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all its objects. For and every , there is a natural exact sequence where ; it is natural in the short exact sequence and contravariantly natural in .
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has a degreewise finite minimal free resolution.
Proof
Choose the minimal resolution supplied by [F5]. Since , [F2] says that its last nonzero term is with and for . Thus it gives a minimal exact sequence . Write . The map on every induced by is zero. If , the injection would be zero with nonzero source, impossible. Hence .
For , the adjacent Ext terms for the free modules vanish, so . At , exactness and the zero map in degree identify with . Thus the first nonzero Ext degree is , proving the depth formula, also for .
auslander buchsbaum first syzygy depth
Statement
In a minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, let be finite. If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension: Let be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If , then and .
The three Depth Lemma inequalities: Let be a Noetherian local ring and a short exact sequence of finite -modules. With , , and , The last inequality is vacuous when .
Proof
Write , , and . The equality for follows directly since an element is injective on a nonzero finite direct sum of exactly when it is injective on , also after successive quotients. The hypothesis gives . The syzygy is nonzero and finite of projective dimension .
The depth inequality forces , since . In particular . The other inequality now applies and yields . This uses only the stated depth hypothesis on , not the formula being proved by induction later.
auslander buchsbaum formula
Statement
For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
auslander buchsbaum base case free module: If a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has projective dimension zero, then it is finite free of positive rank and .
auslander buchsbaum projective dimension one: If is a nonzero finite module of projective dimension one over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , then and .
auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension: Let be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If , then and .
auslander buchsbaum first syzygy depth: In a minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, let be finite. If , then .
Proof
Induct on . For the module is nonzero finite free and has the ring depth. For the separate minimal-matrix argument proves the formula.
For , take the first syzygy in a minimal presentation. It is nonzero finite with projective dimension , so the inductive assertion gives . The conditional syzygy-depth lemma then gives . This completes the induction.
If , the formula forces projective dimension zero, and the base-case theorem gives freeness. The nonzero and finite-projective-dimension hypotheses are retained throughout.
global dimension is detected on cyclic modules
Statement
For a unital ring , its left global dimension equals over all left ideals , and equals the supremum of the injective dimensions of all left modules. The equalities allow infinity; in the commutative Noetherian case the cyclic modules are finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
Left and right global dimension of a ring: For a ring , define and They are separately defined extended natural numbers; their equality is not part of the notation.
Baer's criterion for injective modules: Assume the Axiom of Choice. A left -module is injective if and only if every homomorphism from a left ideal extends to a homomorphism . The forward implication is choice-free. The converse uses AC through Zorn's lemma.
Injective dimension at most n iff higher Ext vanishes: Assume enough injectives. For an object and , if and only if for every object and every .
Projective dimension at most n iff higher Ext vanishes: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. In an abelian category with enough projectives and enough injectives, fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects. Let be an object and . The following are equivalent: 1. ; 2. for every object and every ; 3. for every object .
Ext dimension shifting in the second variable: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let be abelian with enough projectives and enough injectives, and fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all its objects. If is an injective copresentation, then for there are natural isomorphisms ; its low-degree part is .
Module categories have enough injectives: Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every unital ring and every left -module , there is an injective left -module and a monomorphism . Thus left -modules have enough injectives. For commutative , one explicit functorial target is where ; the embedding is . Here is a left -module by .
Proof
Fix and suppose every has projective dimension at most . For any left module , choose an injective resolution and let be its th cosyzygy, with when . Dimension shifting gives . The last vanishing follows from the projective-dimension Ext criterion.
To apply Baer, any map extends to : its pushout with yields an extension of by , whose Ext class is zero and hence splits. Therefore is injective by Baer. The truncated injective resolution gives , so all vanish for and arbitrary .
The projective-dimension criterion now gives for every module . Conversely such a global bound applies to all cyclic modules and forces every injective dimension at most by the same Ext criterion. Thus all three bounds are equivalent for each finite , proving equality of their extended suprema. This includes the zero ring, whose only module has dimension zero under the adopted resolution convention.
local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension
Statement
For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , , allowing infinity. If this common value is , every -module has projective dimension at most .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
global dimension is detected on cyclic modules: For a unital ring , its left global dimension equals over all left ideals , and equals the supremum of the injective dimensions of all left modules. The equalities allow infinity; in the commutative Noetherian case the cyclic modules are finite.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
Tor is symmetric over a commutative ring: If is commutative and are -modules, then naturally.
Proof
The lower bound is immediate because is an -module. If its projective dimension is infinite this already proves the equality. Otherwise let . Compute Tor using a length- resolution of and use symmetry to get for every module .
For each nonzero finite , the minimal-resolution criterion gives ; the zero module is projective as well. In particular every cyclic module has that bound. Cyclic detection extends it to all modules and hence bounds global dimension by . This includes .
positive depth ring has regular minimal generator
Statement
If a nonzero Noetherian local ring has positive depth, then some is a nonzerodivisor. The residue field need not be infinite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Finite modules over Noetherian rings have finitely many associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. Then is a finite set.
Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a left -module. Then the set of zero divisors on is If is finitely generated, this is a finite union.
An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be prime ideals with . If then for some .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
The associated primes are finite, none is , and their union is the set of zero divisors. Discard primes contained in others to obtain an antichain . Prime avoidance chooses outside their union (if the list is empty this restriction is vacuous). If , take .
If , Nakayama and positive depth give ; choose . If avoids every retained prime take . Otherwise divide them into the nonempty class containing and the class not containing it. For each , antichain incomparability and prime avoidance give outside all primes of . Put , with empty product .
Then is outside , since . At a prime of , lies in the prime and does not. At a prime of , lies in the prime and does not. Thus avoids every associated prime and is a nonzerodivisor. No infinite-field argument was used.
regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution
Statement
Let be nonzero Noetherian local, let be a nonzero finite module, and let be a nonzerodivisor on both and . Reducing a minimal free resolution of modulo gives a minimal free resolution of over . Moreover , including infinity. For the zero-complex assertion also holds, with both projective dimensions zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
The balanced Tor bifunctor: For a right -module , a left -module , and , define to be either for a projective resolution of or for a projective resolution of , identified by the preceding natural balance isomorphism. On maps it uses the homology maps induced by comparison maps; coherence makes this a well-defined covariant bifunctor.
Tor is symmetric over a commutative ring: If is commutative and are -modules, then naturally.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
The complex resolves . Tensoring it with has no positive homology since multiplication by is injective on . Balance and symmetry of Tor show that reducing any free resolution of modulo has no positive homology and degree-zero homology .
A minimal degreewise finite resolution exists, and its matrices reduce to entries in . Its finite ranks do not change on reduction to the nonzero local ring . Nakayama gives , so the last-nonzero-Betti criterion identifies both projective dimensions with the same last nonzero rank, or infinity if ranks persist arbitrarily far. For choose the zero complex on both sides.
residue field splits off reduced maximal ideal
Statement
Let be nonzero Noetherian local and a nonzerodivisor. Over the sequence splits, and . Consequently finite implies finite .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution: Let be nonzero Noetherian local, let be a nonzero finite module, and let be a nonzerodivisor on both and . Reducing a minimal free resolution of modulo gives a minimal free resolution of over . Moreover , including infinity. For the zero-complex assertion also holds, with both projective dimensions zero.
auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension: Let be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If , then and .
Projective dimension at most n iff higher Ext vanishes: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. In an abelian category with enough projectives and enough injectives, fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects. Let be an object and . The following are equivalent: 1. ; 2. for every object and every ; 3. for every object .
Proof
The sequence is the quotient sequence for ; kills every term. Multiplication by identifies with because cancellation is valid. Choose a -linear functional on taking the class of to . Composing with gives an -linear retraction onto . Thus the sequence splits.
If is finite, it is positive: projectivity of would split , giving a nontrivial idempotent unless , impossible here. Its first minimal syzygy therefore has finite projective dimension. The element acts injectively on this ideal, so reduction gives finite . Ext is additive on a finite direct sum, and the Ext criterion shows that its summand has finite projective dimension.
finite residue field projective dimension forces depth equals dimension
Statement
If the residue field of a nonzero Noetherian local ring has finite projective dimension, then is regular and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
positive depth ring has regular minimal generator: If a nonzero Noetherian local ring has positive depth, then some is a nonzerodivisor. The residue field need not be infinite.
residue field splits off reduced maximal ideal: Let be nonzero Noetherian local and a nonzerodivisor. Over the sequence splits, and . Consequently finite implies finite .
quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element: Let be nonzero Noetherian local. If is a nonzerodivisor and is regular, then is regular and . For every nonzerodivisor , . If is regular and , then is regular if and only if .
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Depth drops by one after quotienting by a regular element: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, let lie in the Jacobson radical, and let be -regular. Then
Proof
Induct on the finite integer . The residue field has depth zero, since every member of kills it. If , Auslander–Buchsbaum gives and its freeness consequence makes nonzero free. A nonzero free module has zero annihilator, so and is a field.
For choose a nonzerodivisor . The splitting lemma makes finite, and the regular-element depth formula gives depth for the quotient. Depth of this annihilated module over equals its depth over : lift sequences from the quotient or project sequences from ; multiplication and all successive quotients are identical.
The inductive assertion makes regular. Lifting across the nonzerodivisor makes regular; its regular parameters make it Cohen–Macaulay, so depth equals dimension, and regularity equates that dimension with embedding dimension. This completes the induction.
regular local residue field koszul resolution
Statement
For a regular local ring of dimension , the Koszul complex on any regular system of parameters is a minimal free resolution of of length .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Koszul Complex Resolves A Regular Quotient: If is finite free and is -regular, then is a finite free resolution of .
minimal free resolution differentials land in maximal ideal: For an augmented degreewise finite free resolution over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , minimality means that every positive differential matrix has entries in . Equivalently no positive differential admits a unit pivot, or a nonzero two-term identity direct summand. A unit pivot can be cancelled without changing the resolved module.
Proof
The parameters form an -regular sequence and generate . Koszul acyclicity for a finite free coefficient module gives a free resolution of .
Every differential entry is a parameter up to sign and hence lies in , so the resolution is minimal. Its degree- module is , zero for and rank one in degree . When , it is just in degree zero, the Koszul complex on the empty tuple.
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension
Statement
For a regular local ring of dimension , and for , with for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local residue field koszul resolution: For a regular local ring of dimension , the Koszul complex on any regular system of parameters is a minimal free resolution of of length .
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
Complete Intersection Betti Numbers Binomial: For a length- regular sequence in the maximal ideal of a local ring, the minimal Koszul resolution has for and otherwise.
Proof
The minimal Koszul resolution has degree- rank , and is zero above . The Koszul rank formula and the general minimal-resolution rank formula identify these with the stated Betti numbers.
The top rank is nonzero, so the projective-dimension criterion gives exactly , not merely an upper bound. For the sole rank is .
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion
Statement
For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite residue field projective dimension forces depth equals dimension: If the residue field of a nonzero Noetherian local ring has finite projective dimension, then is regular and .
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring of dimension , and for , with for .
local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , , allowing infinity. If this common value is , every -module has projective dimension at most .
auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
Regularity gives through the Koszul computation. Residue-field projective dimension equals global dimension, so this also bounds every module. Conversely finite projective dimension for every finite module applies to , and finite projective dimension for forces regularity. These implications prove the four-way equivalence and the numerical equalities, also for dimension zero.
Over a regular local ring every finite module has finite projective dimension and . Auslander–Buchsbaum therefore makes depth equivalent to projective dimension zero for a nonzero finite module, hence equivalent to freeness. Conversely a nonzero finite free module has the ring depth.
The useful freeness-lifting argument can also be seen directly. If is injective on a finite and is free over , lift a basis to a surjection by Nakayama, with finite kernel . A relation has coefficients divisible by , so it is ; injectivity on implies . Thus , and Nakayama gives . This includes a zero quotient basis, when .
localisations of regular local rings are regular
Statement
Every prime localization of a regular local ring is regular, and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
Localisation of modules is exact: If is a short exact sequence of -modules, then is a short exact sequence of -modules.
Height equals local dimension: Let be a commutative ring and let . Then . The supremum is allowed to be infinite.
Proof
The finite module has a finite projective resolution by the homological regularity criterion. Localizing preserves exactness; projective modules remain projective because their splittings as summands of free modules localize. The resulting resolution resolves .
The residue field of thus has finite projective dimension, and the same criterion makes this local ring regular. Prime chains in the localization correspond exactly to prime chains below , so its dimension is ; regularity gives its embedding dimension. At height zero the localization is a field.
regular noetherian ring
Definition
A commutative Noetherian ring is regular if for every prime ideal , the local ring is regular local. This includes the zero ring vacuously. The maximal-localization test is proved in the localization and polynomial-extension theorem.
flat local ascent of regularity
Statement
For a flat local map of nonzero Noetherian local rings: if and are regular, then is regular. Conversely, regularity of implies regularity of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element: Let be nonzero Noetherian local. If is a nonzerodivisor and is regular, then is regular and . For every nonzerodivisor , . If is regular and , then is regular if and only if .
Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms: Let be a commutative ring and let be an -module. The module is flat if the functor preserves exact sequences: whenever is exact, so is Since tensoring is always right exact (thm-right-exactness-of-tensor-products, def-exact-and-short-exact-sequences-of-modules), the definition asks for the remaining left-hand exactness. Its equivalent formulation as preservation of injections is proved separately rather than built into the definition. The module is faithfully flat if a sequence of -modules is exact exactly when its tensor with is exact. For a unital ring homomorphism (def-ring-homomorphism) between commutative rings, is an -module by . The map is flat, respectively faithfully flat, when this -module is flat, respectively faithfully flat.
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
Proof
Suppose the base and closed fibre are regular. A regular system of is a regular sequence generating . Tensor the successive injective multiplication maps on with the flat module . This gives injective multiplication by each image on the corresponding quotient of . These quotients are nonzero because their defining ideals lie in .
The terminal quotient is the regular closed fibre. Repeatedly lift regularity across those nonzerodivisors to get regularity of . If , the fibre is and the implication is immediate.
For descent, choose a degreewise finite minimal resolution of and tensor it with . Flatness preserves its exactness, locality puts all differential entries in , and is a nonzero finite -module. If is regular, its finite global dimension forces this minimal resolution to terminate by the Betti criterion. A term is zero only if , so the original resolution over terminates as well. Finite gives regularity of . This argument also covers global dimension zero.
polynomial local regularity fibre step
Statement
For a prime with contraction , the closed fibre of is localized at a prime. That prime is either zero, giving a field, or generated by an irreducible polynomial, giving a DVR. In both cases the fibre is regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs: A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
Every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain: Every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain.
For every field , is a Euclidean domain with degree as Euclidean function: For every field , the ring is a Euclidean domain with Euclidean function on nonzero polynomials.
Proof
Localize first at , quotient by , and then localize at the image of . Fractions and the quotient relation identify the fibre with . Over this field the polynomial ring is Euclidean and hence a PID.
In a PID every nonzero prime is generated by an irreducible and is maximal. Localization at it is a nonfield local PID; every nonzero element is a unit times , so the exponent gives a discrete valuation and the localization is a DVR. The zero-prime localization is the rational function field. DVRs are regular by the one-dimensional theorem, and a field has zero maximal ideal and dimension zero, hence is regular.
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings
Statement
Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
localisations of regular local rings are regular: Every prime localization of a regular local ring is regular, and .
regular noetherian ring: A commutative Noetherian ring is regular if for every prime ideal , the local ring is regular local. This includes the zero ring vacuously. The maximal-localization test is proved in the localization and polynomial-extension theorem.
flat local ascent of regularity: For a flat local map of nonzero Noetherian local rings: if and are regular, then is regular. Conversely, regularity of implies regularity of ; it need not imply regularity of the closed fibre.
polynomial local regularity fibre step: For a prime with contraction , the closed fibre of is localized at a prime. That prime is either zero, giving a field, or generated by an irreducible polynomial, giving a DVR. In both cases the fibre is regular.
If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every : Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then the iterated polynomial ring of def-multivariate-polynomial-ring-by-iteration is Noetherian for every . The index starts at , where the published definition sets and the assertion is the hypothesis itself.
Localisation of modules is exact: If is a short exact sequence of -modules, then is a short exact sequence of -modules.
A finite flat module over a Noetherian ring is finite projective: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finite flat -module. Then is finite projective.
A module is flat if and only if all prime localizations are flat, equivalently all maximal localizations are flat: Let be a commutative ring and let be an -module. The following are equivalent: 1. is flat over . 2. is flat over for every prime ideal . 3. is flat over for every maximal ideal .
Projective dimension at most n iff the nth syzygy is projective: Let be an abelian category with enough projectives, fix a projective resolution , and let . Then In particular, the condition is independent of the chosen projective resolution.
global dimension is detected on cyclic modules: For a unital ring , its left global dimension equals over all left ideals , and equals the supremum of the injective dimensions of all left modules. The equalities allow infinity; in the commutative Noetherian case the cyclic modules are finite.
Localizing a Dedekind domain at a nonzero prime gives a DVR: Let be a Dedekind domain and let be a nonzero prime ideal. Then is a discrete valuation ring.
Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring: Every projective left or right module over an arbitrary ring is flat on its appropriate side.
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
Proof
If maximal localizations are regular, choose a maximal ideal above any prime and use transitivity of localization and regular-local localization to get regularity at that prime. The reverse implication follows by selecting the maximal primes. Localizing a regular ring again has only such prime-local rings, so is regular; the zero ring and a localization that becomes zero satisfy this vacuously.
For a finite module over any Noetherian , localization of a projective resolution gives . Conversely suppose every local dimension is at most a fixed . If , form a partial finite free resolution of length by successively taking finite generators of finite kernels. Its th syzygy is projective at every prime by the syzygy criterion. It is therefore flat locally, hence globally, and finite flat implies projective. The syzygy criterion gives . If , apply the local-flat and finite-projective argument to itself. Thus the supremum formula holds, including infinity and .
The module is free over on the monomials, hence flat. Tensoring followed by localization is exact, so at a prime over the map is flat and local. The base is regular and its closed fibre is regular by the fibre computation; flat-local ascent gives regularity of the target. Polynomial Noetherianity and finite iteration prove the assertion for any finite number of variables, including zero.
For regular nonzero , local homological regularity gives . Applying the preceding lower bound to gives global dimension at least every height, hence at least . If is finite, all localized finite modules have projective dimension at most ; the preceding upper bound and cyclic detection give global dimension at most . If , the lower bounds already give equality.
A Dedekind domain has DVR localizations at its nonzero primes and its fraction field at the zero prime. These are regular, so the domain and its finite polynomial extensions are regular by the preceding results. The equality involving Krull dimension was stated only for nonzero rings, avoiding an undefined dimension for the empty spectrum.
completion preserves embedding dimension
Statement
For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , its maximal-adic completion has maximal ideal , residue field , and a canonical isomorphism . In particular their embedding dimensions agree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, and let be its -adic completion. 1. is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal . 2. The residue field is unchanged: 3. The completion map is faithfully flat.
Completion commutes with finite quotients and induced submodules: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be finitely generated -modules. 1. The natural map is an isomorphism. 2. Under the natural map , the image of is the -submodule . In particular, for every ideal , 3. For every ,
Proof
The completion theorem makes Noetherian local with maximal ideal and residue field . Finite-quotient compatibility identifies with compatibly with their maps to .
The kernels of those maps to are the two cotangent spaces, since . The induced isomorphism is -linear and canonical, so their dimensions agree by the embedding-dimension definition. For both spaces are zero.
completion preserves regular local rings
Statement
A nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular if and only if its maximal-adic completion is regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
completion preserves embedding dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , its maximal-adic completion has maximal ideal , residue field , and a canonical isomorphism . In particular their embedding dimensions agree.
Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finitely generated -module, and let , denote the -adic completions. 1. For every , In particular the Hilbert-Samuel functions of and agree. 2. The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of equals that of . 3. The support dimensions of and are equal.
Proof
Completion preserves the embedding dimension. Applied to the nonzero finite module , the completion dimension theorem also gives , because the support of a ring over itself is its entire spectrum.
Thus holds exactly when . These are the two regularity conditions. The argument also applies when the common dimension or embedding dimension is zero.
normal noetherian ring
Definition
A commutative Noetherian ring is normal if every prime localization is an integrally closed domain. This is a local condition and does not require itself to be a domain. The zero ring satisfies it vacuously. For a domain, integrally closed means that every element of its fraction field integral over it belongs to it.
serre r k and s k conditions
Definition
For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
regular local ring satisfies r one
Statement
Every regular local ring satisfies . Its height-zero localizations are fields, and its height-one localizations are DVRs.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
localisations of regular local rings are regular: Every prime localization of a regular local ring is regular, and .
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs: A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
Proof
Every prime localization is regular, and its dimension is the height of the prime. Thus at all heights at most one it is regular, which is precisely .
At height one the DVR equivalence applies. At height zero regularity makes the cotangent space zero; the generator-number formula makes the maximal ideal zero, hence the local ring is a field.
regular local ring satisfies s two
Statement
Every regular local ring satisfies for every integer , in particular .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
localisations of regular local rings are regular: Every prime localization of a regular local ring is regular, and .
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Proof
At every prime the local ring is regular, hence Cohen–Macaulay. Its depth therefore equals its dimension.
For every , that dimension is at least its minimum with , which is the inequality. The inequality includes and local dimension zero.
normal domain implies r one
Statement
Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs: Let be a Noetherian integrally closed domain, and let be a prime ideal of height . Then the localisation is a discrete valuation ring.
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs: A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
Proof
A height-one localization is a DVR by the normal-domain height-one theorem, and therefore regular by the DVR equivalence.
The only height-zero prime of a domain is ; its localization is the fraction field, which is regular. These two cases give the definition of , including a field, which has no height-one primes.
normal domain implies s two
Statement
Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a domain. Then the following are equivalent: 1. is integrally closed. 2. For every prime ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed. 3. For every maximal ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Depth drops by one after quotienting by a regular element: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, let lie in the Jacobson radical, and let be -regular. Then
Krull's height theorem: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal generated by elements, and let be a prime ideal minimal over . Then .
Proof
Localize at any prime. The resulting ring is again an integrally closed domain. In dimension zero it is a field and the required bound is zero; in positive dimension a nonzero element of the maximal ideal is a nonzerodivisor, so its depth is at least one. It remains to consider .
If such an had depth one, choose . The regular-element depth formula and the depth-zero criterion supply with . Put . Then .
If , take finite generators of the nonzero ideal and write with . The adjugate identity for gives for all . Some in a domain, hence . This is a monic equation for , contradicting integral closedness.
Otherwise there exists with a unit. For every , belongs to , so . The height theorem with one generator gives , again impossible. Therefore depth is at least two at every prime of height at least two; with the low-dimensional cases this is .
r one s two intersection of height one localisations
Statement
If is a commutative Noetherian domain satisfying , then inside its fraction field one has . For a field the empty intersection is interpreted as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
Every submodule of a finite module over a Noetherian ring has a minimal primary decomposition: Assume Dependent Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. Every submodule has a finite primary decomposition. After deleting redundant components and combining equal radicals, one obtains a minimal primary decomposition. When , the decomposition is the empty intersection, interpreted as . In particular, every ideal of a Noetherian ring has a minimal primary decomposition.
The radicals in a minimal primary decomposition are exactly the associated primes of the quotient: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, and let be a minimal primary decomposition in which each is -primary. Assume each is a prime ideal. Then
Depth drops by one after quotienting by a regular element: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, let lie in the Jacobson radical, and let be -regular. Then
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, and let be multiplicative. Then
A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a nonzero left -module. Then is nonempty.
Proof
Let be a nonunit. If , localization and the depth-zero criterion make depth zero. Since is regular, the depth formula gives . Condition forces , and , force equality.
Choose a minimal primary decomposition , with radicals . Those radicals are associated to , hence have height one. If belongs to every height-one localization, then for each there is with . Primaryness gives , hence and .
If is a unit, membership is immediate without a primary decomposition. The inclusion from into every localization is automatic. If the height-one family is empty, a nonzero nonunit would yield an associated prime of its nonzero quotient and hence a height-one prime by the preceding argument; thus is a field and the stipulated empty intersection is correct.
r one s two integral element membership
Statement
A commutative Noetherian domain whose height-one localizations are DVRs is integrally closed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
r one s two intersection of height one localisations: If is a commutative Noetherian domain satisfying , then inside its fraction field one has . For a field the empty intersection is interpreted as .
Valuation rings are integrally closed: Every valuation ring is an integrally closed domain.
Proof
Let satisfy a monic equation over . At each height-one prime the same equation is monic over . A DVR is a valuation ring, hence integrally closed, so .
The height-one intersection theorem now gives . If there are no height-one primes, its empty-intersection convention says is already the fraction field; the conclusion remains valid. Since was arbitrary, is integrally closed.
serre normality criterion two directions
Statement
A commutative Noetherian domain is normal if and only if it satisfies and . Equivalently its integral closedness is characterized by these two conditions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
normal domain implies r one: Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies .
normal domain implies s two: Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies .
r one s two integral element membership: A commutative Noetherian domain whose height-one localizations are DVRs is integrally closed.
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs: A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a domain. Then the following are equivalent: 1. is integrally closed. 2. For every prime ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed. 3. For every maximal ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed.
Proof
For a domain, normality is equivalent to integral closedness by local normality. An integrally closed Noetherian domain satisfies and by the two normal-domain lemmas.
Conversely, makes every height-one localization one-dimensional regular local and hence a DVR. With , the integral-element membership lemma makes integrally closed, and local normality makes it normal. Fields satisfy both conditions and are included.
serre r zero s one characterises reducedness
Statement
For a finite module over a commutative Noetherian ring, is equivalent to every associated prime being minimal in . For the ring itself, this means no embedded associated primes. A commutative Noetherian ring is reduced if and only if it satisfies and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a left -module. Then the set of zero divisors on is If is finitely generated, this is a finite union.
A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a nonzero left -module. Then is nonempty.
A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then has only finitely many minimal prime ideals. This theorem inherits only the dependent-choice cost already recorded in the cited Noetherian-induction corollary.
A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes: Assume Dependent Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals minimal over such that When , this is the empty intersection.
Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, and let be multiplicative. Then
An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be prime ideals with . If then for some .
Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. If is minimal in , then
Proof
At a prime in the support, depth zero is equivalent to that prime being associated, by localization of associated primes and the local depth-zero criterion. Such an associated prime violates exactly when the localized support has positive dimension, namely when there is a strictly smaller support prime. Thus is equivalent to all associated primes being minimal in support. Minimal support primes are associated as well. For both conditions are vacuous.
If is reduced, its minimal primes are finite and have intersection zero. An element outside their union is a nonzerodivisor, since its product with being zero forces into every . Conversely, for , choose by taking a product of elements of . Then and . Thus zero divisors are exactly this finite union. An associated prime is contained in that union and hence in one minimal prime by prime avoidance; it must equal it. This proves .
At a minimal prime, localization of a reduced ring is reduced and has only one prime ideal. Its nilradical, the intersection of its primes, is therefore that maximal ideal and is zero. It is a field, so holds. Conversely suppose and hold. If the nilradical were nonzero, choose an associated prime of ; its annihilator witness in makes it associated to , hence minimal by . The witness survives there, but makes that localization a field and annihilates all nilpotents, a contradiction. Hence . The zero ring satisfies the assertions vacuously.
total ring of fractions
Definition
For a nonzero commutative ring , let be the set of its nonzerodivisors, meaning elements whose multiplication maps on are injective. Its total ring of fractions is . The set is multiplicative since composites of injective multiplication maps are injective. The natural map is injective: implies for some , hence . Set . For a domain this recovers the fraction field; for a ring with zero divisors it need not be a field.
reduced noetherian total fractions and normal components
Statement
For a reduced commutative Noetherian ring with minimal primes , there is a canonical isomorphism . The following are equivalent: is normal; is integrally closed in ; and is a finite product of normal domains. For this is the empty product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
total ring of fractions: For a nonzero commutative ring , let be the set of its nonzerodivisors, meaning elements whose multiplication maps on are injective. Its total ring of fractions is . The set is multiplicative since composites of injective multiplication maps are injective. The natural map is injective: implies for some , hence . Set . For a domain this recovers the fraction field; for a ring with zero divisors it need not be a field.
normal noetherian ring: A commutative Noetherian ring is normal if every prime localization is an integrally closed domain. This is a local condition and does not require itself to be a domain. The zero ring satisfies it vacuously. For a domain, integrally closed means that every element of its fraction field integral over it belongs to it.
A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then has only finitely many minimal prime ideals. This theorem inherits only the dependent-choice cost already recorded in the cited Noetherian-induction corollary.
A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes: Assume Dependent Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals minimal over such that When , this is the empty intersection.
A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a domain. Then the following are equivalent: 1. is integrally closed. 2. For every prime ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed. 3. For every maximal ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed.
Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals: Let be a commutative ring and let be pairwise comaximal ideals, where . Then the canonical map is surjective, its kernel is , and Equivalently,
An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be prime ideals with . If then for some .
Proof
For , the finite minimal-prime intersection is zero. If avoids every minimal prime, forces . If , a product of elements in for supplies nonzero with . Thus the nonzerodivisors are the complement of the union of the minimal primes. Prime avoidance implies that the primes surviving in are exactly these minimal primes.
The surviving primes of the reduced ring are finitely many distinct maximal ideals with intersection zero. CRT decomposes as their residue fields. Localization at the corresponding minimal prime of is reduced with only the zero prime, hence is a field, and is the fraction field of . This identifies each factor and the canonical map.
If is integrally closed in , it contains every coordinate idempotent , since each solves . Thus , with . For an element integral over one factor, put it in that coordinate and zero in the other coordinates. A monic equation in the factor, multiplied by if necessary and with coefficients lifted to that coordinate, gives a monic equation over the product ring; integral closedness puts it in . Each factor is integrally closed, hence a normal domain by local normality.
If is normal, no prime can contain two distinct minimal primes: localization would give two distinct minimal primes in a domain. Hence the minimal primes are pairwise comaximal. CRT gives ; the localizations of a component are the corresponding localizations of , so the components are normal domains. Conversely a finite product of normal domains has normal prime localizations, and a monic equation in its total fractions is coordinatewise integral, so the product is integrally closed there. For all assertions hold directly without applying CRT to an empty family.
depth two excludes finite punctured extension
Statement
Let be reduced Noetherian local with . If is a finite intermediate ring and , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
total ring of fractions: For a nonzero commutative ring , let be the set of its nonzerodivisors, meaning elements whose multiplication maps on are injective. Its total ring of fractions is . The set is multiplicative since composites of injective multiplication maps are injective. The natural map is injective: implies for some , hence . Set . For a domain this recovers the fraction field; for a ring with zero divisors it need not be a field.
The three Depth Lemma inequalities: Let be a Noetherian local ring and a short exact sequence of finite -modules. With , , and , The last inequality is vacuous when .
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator: If is a finitely generated left -module, then
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
Choose the first element of an -regular sequence of length two. It is a unit in , so it acts injectively on . Since is nonzero finite and , Nakayama gives , hence . Applied to , the depth lemma gives if .
If and its support is contained in the closed point, the support-annihilator theorem gives . Finitely many generators of each have a power in the annihilator; expanding monomials gives for some . A last nonzero power contains a nonzero element killed by , making associated and . This contradicts the preceding bound. Thus and , including the case of empty support.
serre normality criterion
Statement
For every commutative Noetherian ring , including rings with zero divisors and the zero ring, is normal if and only if it satisfies and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
normal noetherian ring: A commutative Noetherian ring is normal if every prime localization is an integrally closed domain. This is a local condition and does not require itself to be a domain. The zero ring satisfies it vacuously. For a domain, integrally closed means that every element of its fraction field integral over it belongs to it.
serre normality criterion two directions: A commutative Noetherian domain is normal if and only if it satisfies and . Equivalently its integral closedness is characterized by these two conditions.
serre r zero s one characterises reducedness: For a finite module over a commutative Noetherian ring, is equivalent to every associated prime being minimal in . For the ring itself, this means no embedded associated primes. A commutative Noetherian ring is reduced if and only if it satisfies and .
reduced noetherian total fractions and normal components: For a reduced commutative Noetherian ring with minimal primes , there is a canonical isomorphism . The following are equivalent: is normal; is integrally closed in ; and is a finite product of normal domains. For this is the empty product.
depth two excludes finite punctured extension: Let be reduced Noetherian local with . If is a finite intermediate ring and , then .
one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs: A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring. Fields are excluded from the term DVR.
Valuation rings are integrally closed: Every valuation ring is an integrally closed domain.
embedding dimension is minimal maximal ideal generator number: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , is the least number of generators of .
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Proof
If is normal, each prime localization is a normal domain. The domain criterion gives the required depth bound there and regularity when its dimension is at most one. Thus satisfies both conditions. The zero ring satisfies all three conditions vacuously.
Conversely and imply and , so is reduced. Both conditions pass to prime localizations, since prime chains below a prime and successive localizations are unchanged. It is enough to prove that every reduced Noetherian local ring satisfying them is a normal domain. Induct on its finite dimension . For , makes regular; in dimension zero its maximal ideal is zero by the generator formula, so it is a field; in dimension one it is a DVR, hence an integrally closed domain by the valuation theorem.
Let and be integral over . A monic equation shows is finite, generated by finitely many powers of . For a nonmaximal prime of , the dimension of is less than (append the maximal ideal to any chain below ), so it is a normal domain by induction. A nonzerodivisor of remains a nonzerodivisor after localization: clear denominators in the equation it kills. Thus embeds into . The image of is integral and belongs to , giving .
Therefore is supported only at the maximal ideal. Since gives depth at least two, finite-extension rigidity implies . Every integral element of lies in . The total-fraction component theorem now makes a finite product of normal domains. A nonzero local ring has no idempotents except zero and one: one of is a unit, forcing the other to vanish. Thus the product has a single factor and is a normal domain. This completes the local induction and hence the global converse.
regular local rings are normal
Statement
Every regular local ring is an integrally closed domain. Every commutative regular Noetherian ring is normal and is a finite product of regular domains, with the zero ring corresponding to the empty product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local domain induction: Every regular local ring is an integral domain.
regular local ring satisfies r one: Every regular local ring satisfies . Its height-zero localizations are fields, and its height-one localizations are DVRs.
regular local ring satisfies s two: Every regular local ring satisfies for every integer , in particular .
serre normality criterion: For every commutative Noetherian ring , including rings with zero divisors and the zero ring, is normal if and only if it satisfies and .
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
reduced noetherian total fractions and normal components: For a reduced commutative Noetherian ring with minimal primes , there is a canonical isomorphism . The following are equivalent: is normal; is integrally closed in ; and is a finite product of normal domains. For this is the empty product.
Proof
A regular local ring is a domain and satisfies and . Serre normality therefore makes it normal; at its maximal ideal the localization is the ring itself, so it is integrally closed.
For a regular Noetherian ring, every prime localization is regular local, hence an integrally closed domain by the preceding argument. It is therefore normal. The normal-component theorem expresses it as a finite product of normal domains; each factor is regular since its prime localizations are those of the product. The zero ring is the empty product. No factoriality assertion is made.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- 12.3–12.5, p.115
- 12.3, p.115
- Remark 12.4, p.115
- 12.5, p.115
- 10.106.1, first proof paragraph
- 10.106.1 proof; Li Proposition 25.6
- Proposition 25.6, p.67
- 10.106.1, monomial-count consequence
- 10.106.2
- 10.106.2–10.106.3
- Proposition 12.7, p.115
- Proposition 12.8 and Exercise 12.16, pp.116–117
- Example 12.10, p.116
- Proposition 12.13, pp.116–117
- Construction before Proposition 12.27, p.120
- Definition 1.49 and discussion after Lemma 1.50, pp.23–24
- Proposition 12.27 proof, p.121
- Unnumbered Betti-number definition after Lemma 1.50, p.24
- Proposition 12.27, pp.120–121
- Remark 12.28, p.121
- Corollary 12.29, p.121
- Theorem 12.31 proof, Case 3, p.122
- Theorem 1.53, pd=0 case, p.24
- Theorem 1.53 proof, Claim, p.25
- Theorem 1.53, pp.24–25
- Theorem 1.53, final induction step, p.25
- Theorem 1.53, pp.24–25; Mustata 12.31
- Propositions 12.24–12.25, p.120
- Corollary 12.30, p.121
- Theorem 12.33 proof, p.123; Lemma 5.1 variant
- Lemma 12.32 and proof of 12.31 Case 2, p.122
- Theorem 12.33 proof, p.123; Jeffries 1.60
- Theorem 12.33, p.123
- Theorem 12.33 forward proof, p.123
- 12.27 and 12.33, pp.121–123
- Theorem 12.33 and Corollary 12.30, pp.121–123
- Corollary 12.34, p.123
- Definition 12.14 and Corollary 12.34
- Exercise 12.40(i), p.124
- Lemma 10.110.9 full proof (minimal-resolution version of its syzygy argument)
- Proposition 12.36 proof, p.124
- Corollary 12.34 and Proposition 12.36, pp.123–124
- Corollary 12.35, pp.123–124
- Lecture 25, completion properties (1), (5), (6), pp.68–69
- Lecture 25, property (6), p.69
- Definition 8.34 and Remarks 8.35–8.36, p.56
- Definition 10.157.1
- 10.157.5, R1 implication
- 10.157.5, S2 implication
- 10.157.4 forward implication
- Lemma 8.40 proof, pp.56–57 (normal hypothesis required); 8.41
- Proposition 8.41 proof, pp.57–58; Stacks 10.157.6(1)–(2)
- Proposition 8.41 final proof paragraph, p.58
- Proposition 8.41 and Lemma 8.40, pp.56–58
- 10.157.2–10.157.3
- 10.37.16 proof, total fraction ring used there
- 10.37.16, full proof
- Lemma 10.25.4, full proof
- 10.119.2 last proof paragraph, restricted finite-extension rigidity
- 10.157.4 complete proof, with 030C and 0BHZ
- 10.157.5