How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
normal domain implies s two
Statement
Every commutative Noetherian integrally closed domain satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a domain. Then the following are equivalent: 1. is integrally closed. 2. For every prime ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed. 3. For every maximal ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Depth drops by one after quotienting by a regular element: Let be Noetherian, let be finite, let lie in the Jacobson radical, and let be -regular. Then
Krull's height theorem: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal generated by elements, and let be a prime ideal minimal over . Then .
Proof
Localize at any prime. The resulting ring is again an integrally closed domain. In dimension zero it is a field and the required bound is zero; in positive dimension a nonzero element of the maximal ideal is a nonzerodivisor, so its depth is at least one. It remains to consider .
If such an had depth one, choose . The regular-element depth formula and the depth-zero criterion supply with . Put . Then .
If , take finite generators of the nonzero ideal and write with . The adjugate identity for gives for all . Some in a domain, hence . This is a monic equation for , contradicting integral closedness.
Otherwise there exists with a unit. For every , belongs to , so . The height theorem with one generator gives , again impossible. Therefore depth is at least two at every prime of height at least two; with the low-dimensional cases this is .
Depends on
Used by
- serre normality criterion two directions Corollary
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lemma 8.40 proof, pp.56–57 (normal hypothesis required); 8.41 (standard reference, not scraped)