Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice.

Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let IR be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals p1,,pm minimal over I such that

I=p1pm.

When I=R, this is the empty intersection.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Dependent Choice, a Noetherian commutative ring R, and a radical ideal IR.

[L1]

Assuming Dependent Choice, every ideal of a Noetherian ring has a minimal primary decomposition (Every submodule of a finite module over a Noetherian ring has a minimal primary decomposition).

[L2]

The radical of a primary ideal is prime (The radical of a primary ideal is prime).

[L3]

The radical of an intersection of n1 ideals is the intersection of their radicals (The radical of a finite intersection).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If I=R, then no prime ideal contains I, and the empty intersection is R. This is exactly the stated boundary case.

given
1.2

Assume IR. By [L1], choose a minimal primary decomposition I=Q1Qr. Since the empty intersection is R, one has r1. For each i, put pi=Qi. Fact [L2] makes every pi prime. Since I is radical, I=I=Q1Qr=Q1Qr=p1pr by [L3].

L1L2L3choosealgebra
2.1

Let M be the set of inclusion-minimal members among the finite family {p1,,pr}. If one prime in the family contains another, removing the larger one does not change the intersection, so the intersection over M is still I. Every prime q minimal over I contains the product p1pr, which is contained in I, so primality of q forces piq for some i. Since Ipi and q is minimal among primes containing I, this gives q=pi. Thus the members of M are exactly the minimal prime ideals over I.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1 prove that a radical ideal is the finite intersection of its minimal primes.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources