How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice.
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals minimal over such that
When , this is the empty intersection.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice, a Noetherian commutative ring , and a radical ideal .
Assuming Dependent Choice, every ideal of a Noetherian ring has a minimal primary decomposition (Every submodule of a finite module over a Noetherian ring has a minimal primary decomposition).
The radical of a primary ideal is prime (The radical of a primary ideal is prime).
The radical of an intersection of ideals is the intersection of their radicals (The radical of a finite intersection).
Proof
If , then no prime ideal contains , and the empty intersection is . This is exactly the stated boundary case.
Assume . By [L1], choose a minimal primary decomposition Since the empty intersection is , one has . For each , put . Fact [L2] makes every prime. Since is radical, by [L3].
Let be the set of inclusion-minimal members among the finite family . If one prime in the family contains another, removing the larger one does not change the intersection, so the intersection over is still . Every prime minimal over contains the product , which is contained in , so primality of forces for some . Since and is minimal among primes containing , this gives . Thus the members of are exactly the minimal prime ideals over .
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1 prove that a radical ideal is the finite intersection of its minimal primes.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 19.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §18 (standard reference, not scraped)