Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

serre r zero s one characterises reducedness

Statement

For a finite module M over a commutative Noetherian ring, (S1) is equivalent to every associated prime being minimal in SuppM. For the ring itself, this means no embedded associated primes. A commutative Noetherian ring is reduced if and only if it satisfies (R0) and (S1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring R and an integer j0, condition (Rj) means that Rp is regular whenever htpj. Condition (Sj) means that depthRpmin{j,dimRp} for every prime p. A finite module M satisfies (Sj) if depthRpMpmin{j,dimSuppRpMp} for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being + and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all (Sj) conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.

[F2]

The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring and let M0 be a finite R-module. Then depth(M)=0mAssR(M).

[F3]

Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let M be a left R-module. Then the set of zero divisors on M is pAssR(M)p. If M is finitely generated, this is a finite union.

[F4]

A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let M be a nonzero left R-module. Then AssR(M) is nonempty.

[F5]

A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then R has only finitely many minimal prime ideals. This theorem inherits only the dependent-choice cost already recorded in the cited Noetherian-induction corollary.

[F6]

A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes: Assume Dependent Choice. Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let IR be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals p1,,pm minimal over I such that I=p1pm. When I=R, this is the empty intersection.

[F7]

Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring, let M be a finitely generated left R-module, and let SR be multiplicative. Then AssS1R(S1M)={S1p:pAssR(M), pS=}.

[F8]

An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let R be a commutative ring, let IR be an ideal, and let p1,,pn be prime ideals with n1. If Ip1pn, then Ipi for some i.

[F9]

Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If p is minimal in SuppR(M), then pAssR(M).

Proof

1.1

At a prime in the support, depth zero is equivalent to that prime being associated, by localization of associated primes and the local depth-zero criterion. Such an associated prime violates (S1) exactly when the localized support has positive dimension, namely when there is a strictly smaller support prime. Thus (S1) is equivalent to all associated primes being minimal in support. Minimal support primes are associated as well. For M=0 both conditions are vacuous.

F7F2F1F9
2.1

If R is reduced, its minimal primes p1,,ps are finite and have intersection zero. An element outside their union is a nonzerodivisor, since its product with b being zero forces b into every pi. Conversely, for api, choose bjipjpi by taking a product of elements of pjpi. Then b0 and ab=0. Thus zero divisors are exactly this finite union. An associated prime is contained in that union and hence in one minimal prime by prime avoidance; it must equal it. This proves (S1).

F5F6F3F8step 1.1
3.1

At a minimal prime, localization of a reduced ring is reduced and has only one prime ideal. Its nilradical, the intersection of its primes, is therefore that maximal ideal and is zero. It is a field, so (R0) holds. Conversely suppose (R0) and (S1) hold. If the nilradical N were nonzero, choose an associated prime of N; its annihilator witness in NR makes it associated to R, hence minimal by (S1). The witness survives there, but (R0) makes that localization a field and annihilates all nilpotents, a contradiction. Hence N=0. The zero ring satisfies the assertions vacuously.

F4F1step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources