How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
serre r zero s one characterises reducedness
Statement
For a finite module over a commutative Noetherian ring, is equivalent to every associated prime being minimal in . For the ring itself, this means no embedded associated primes. A commutative Noetherian ring is reduced if and only if it satisfies and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
serre r k and s k conditions: For a commutative Noetherian ring and an integer , condition means that is regular whenever . Condition means that for every prime . A finite module satisfies if for every prime in its support. Outside the support the condition is vacuous, consistent with depth of the zero module being and the empty support having no nonnegative dimension. Thus the zero module satisfies all conditions, and the zero ring satisfies both families vacuously.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a left -module. Then the set of zero divisors on is If is finitely generated, this is a finite union.
A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a nonzero left -module. Then is nonempty.
A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then has only finitely many minimal prime ideals. This theorem inherits only the dependent-choice cost already recorded in the cited Noetherian-induction corollary.
A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes: Assume Dependent Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals minimal over such that When , this is the empty intersection.
Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, and let be multiplicative. Then
An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be prime ideals with . If then for some .
Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. If is minimal in , then
Proof
At a prime in the support, depth zero is equivalent to that prime being associated, by localization of associated primes and the local depth-zero criterion. Such an associated prime violates exactly when the localized support has positive dimension, namely when there is a strictly smaller support prime. Thus is equivalent to all associated primes being minimal in support. Minimal support primes are associated as well. For both conditions are vacuous.
If is reduced, its minimal primes are finite and have intersection zero. An element outside their union is a nonzerodivisor, since its product with being zero forces into every . Conversely, for , choose by taking a product of elements of . Then and . Thus zero divisors are exactly this finite union. An associated prime is contained in that union and hence in one minimal prime by prime avoidance; it must equal it. This proves .
At a minimal prime, localization of a reduced ring is reduced and has only one prime ideal. Its nilradical, the intersection of its primes, is therefore that maximal ideal and is zero. It is a field, so holds. Conversely suppose and hold. If the nilradical were nonzero, choose an associated prime of ; its annihilator witness in makes it associated to , hence minimal by . The witness survives there, but makes that localization a field and annihilates all nilpotents, a contradiction. Hence . The zero ring satisfies the assertions vacuously.
Depends on
- serre r k and s k conditions
- The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion
- Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes
- A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime
- A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals
- A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes
- Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules
- An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them
- Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated
Used by
- serre normality criterion Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 10.157.2–10.157.3 (standard reference, not scraped)