How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The radical of a finite intersection
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, and let with . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , ideals , and an integer .
Radical is order-preserving on ideals (The radical of an ideal is an ideal).
Proof
Since for every , [L1] gives for every , hence .
Conversely, let . For each , choose with , and set . Then for every , so . Hence .
The two inclusions prove the stated equality.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Hochster, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Math 614 notes (2020) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)