Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The radical of a finite intersection

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, and let I1,,InR with n1. Then

I1In=I1In.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, ideals I1,,InR, and an integer n1.

[L1]

Radical is order-preserving on ideals (The radical of an ideal is an ideal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since I1InIj for every j, [L1] gives I1InIj for every j, hence I1InI1In.

L1given
1.2

Conversely, let xI1In. For each j, choose mj1 with xmjIj, and set N=m1++mn. Then xN=xNmjxmjIj for every j, so xNI1In. Hence xI1In.

choosegivenalgebra
2.1

The two inclusions prove the stated equality.

step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources