How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The radical of a product of ideals
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be ideals. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and ideals .
The radical of a finite intersection is the intersection of the radicals (The radical of a finite intersection).
The product ideal is generated by finite sums of products with and (The sum and product of two-sided ideals).
Proof
Every generator of lies in both and , so . Therefore by [L1].
If , choose with and . Then , so .
Step 1.1 gives , step 1.2 gives the reverse inclusion, and [L1] identifies that common ideal with .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Hochster, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Math 614 notes (2020) (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)