How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
reduced noetherian total fractions and normal components
Statement
For a reduced commutative Noetherian ring with minimal primes , there is a canonical isomorphism . The following are equivalent: is normal; is integrally closed in ; and is a finite product of normal domains. For this is the empty product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
total ring of fractions: For a nonzero commutative ring , let be the set of its nonzerodivisors, meaning elements whose multiplication maps on are injective. Its total ring of fractions is . The set is multiplicative since composites of injective multiplication maps are injective. The natural map is injective: implies for some , hence . Set . For a domain this recovers the fraction field; for a ring with zero divisors it need not be a field.
normal noetherian ring: A commutative Noetherian ring is normal if every prime localization is an integrally closed domain. This is a local condition and does not require itself to be a domain. The zero ring satisfies it vacuously. For a domain, integrally closed means that every element of its fraction field integral over it belongs to it.
A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then has only finitely many minimal prime ideals. This theorem inherits only the dependent-choice cost already recorded in the cited Noetherian-induction corollary.
A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes: Assume Dependent Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a radical ideal. Then there exist finitely many prime ideals minimal over such that When , this is the empty intersection.
A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a domain. Then the following are equivalent: 1. is integrally closed. 2. For every prime ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed. 3. For every maximal ideal of , the localisation is integrally closed.
Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals: Let be a commutative ring and let be pairwise comaximal ideals, where . Then the canonical map is surjective, its kernel is , and Equivalently,
An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be prime ideals with . If then for some .
Proof
For , the finite minimal-prime intersection is zero. If avoids every minimal prime, forces . If , a product of elements in for supplies nonzero with . Thus the nonzerodivisors are the complement of the union of the minimal primes. Prime avoidance implies that the primes surviving in are exactly these minimal primes.
The surviving primes of the reduced ring are finitely many distinct maximal ideals with intersection zero. CRT decomposes as their residue fields. Localization at the corresponding minimal prime of is reduced with only the zero prime, hence is a field, and is the fraction field of . This identifies each factor and the canonical map.
If is integrally closed in , it contains every coordinate idempotent , since each solves . Thus , with . For an element integral over one factor, put it in that coordinate and zero in the other coordinates. A monic equation in the factor, multiplied by if necessary and with coefficients lifted to that coordinate, gives a monic equation over the product ring; integral closedness puts it in . Each factor is integrally closed, hence a normal domain by local normality.
If is normal, no prime can contain two distinct minimal primes: localization would give two distinct minimal primes in a domain. Hence the minimal primes are pairwise comaximal. CRT gives ; the localizations of a component are the corresponding localizations of , so the components are normal domains. Conversely a finite product of normal domains has normal prime localizations, and a monic equation in its total fractions is coordinatewise integral, so the product is integrally closed there. For all assertions hold directly without applying CRT to an empty family.
Depends on
- total ring of fractions
- normal noetherian ring
- A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals
- A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of its minimal primes
- A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are
- Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals
- An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them
Used by
- regular local rings are normal Theorem
- serre normality criterion Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 10.37.16, full proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lemma 10.25.4, full proof (standard reference, not scraped)