How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
auslander buchsbaum base case free module
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). If a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has projective dimension zero, then it is finite free of positive rank and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Projective dimension of an object: Assume projective resolutions are supplied or exist in the relevant class. The projective dimension of is with value if this set is empty. A length-zero projective resolution exists exactly when is projective.
Depth with respect to an ideal, Regular Sequence On A Module: Depth is the supremum of lengths of regular sequences in the maximal ideal. A sequence is regular when each multiplication map on its successive nonzero quotient is injective and the final quotient is nonzero.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of and is a unit for every : Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, every element outside the unique maximal ideal of a local ring is a unit; in particular every element of is a unit.
Proof
Projective dimension zero means that is projective. The finite-dimensional residue space has a basis of, say, elements; lift them to . Their span equals : the finite module satisfies , and if generate , write with . The adjugate identity gives for all , while is a unit by [F3]. Hence .
The resulting surjection splits because is projective. Its kernel is finite, being the image of the complementary idempotent on . Reducing the split sum modulo , the chosen residue basis makes an isomorphism, so . Applying the finite determinant argument of step 1.1 to gives . Thus , and forces .
For any finite sequence in and each prefix , the quotient is . Since , this quotient is nonzero exactly when is nonzero, and multiplication by on it is injective exactly when multiplication by on the ring quotient is injective. The final quotients are likewise nonzero together. Thus precisely the same finite sequences in are regular on and on . Their possible lengths, hence their depths, are equal, including depth zero.
Depends on
Used by
- auslander buchsbaum formula Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theorem 1.53, pd=0 case, p.24 (standard reference, not scraped)