Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-09-09 (gpt-6-astra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring

Statement

Every projective left or right module over an arbitrary unital ring is flat on its appropriate side. This implication requires no Axiom of Choice.

Proof

Given: a projective left R-module P; the right-module case is symmetric.

1.1given

The choice-free implication in Equivalent characterizations of projective modules supplies a split free cover F=R(I)≅P⊕P′: lift the identity of P through its canonical free cover. Fix the resulting inclusion i:P→F and retraction p:F→P.

2.1step 1.1algebra

For any right module N, the balanced pairing (n,(rj))↦(nrj)j induces N⊗RF→N(I) by Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups. Its inverse sends a finite-support tuple (nj) to ∑jnj⊗ej. The two composites fix elementary tensors and coordinate generators, since n⊗∑jrjej=∑jnrj⊗ej. These identifications commute with homomorphisms in N.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Direct sums of exact sequences are exact: kernels are computed coordinatewise, and an element of the kernel has finite support, so finitely many preimages suffice to lift it from the preceding term. Finite choices require no AC. Thus step 2.1 shows that −⊗RF is exact.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Tensoring i and p gives natural maps with composite the identity. If z is a cycle in a sequence tensored with P, include it into the sequence tensored with F, lift it there by step 3.1, and retract that lift using p. This proves exactness after tensoring with P, including the endpoint conditions. Hence P is flat by Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

For a projective right module, use its split right free cover and the balanced isomorphism R(I)⊗RN→N(I), (rj)⊗n↦(rjn)j, whose inverse is (nj)↦∑jej⊗nj. The same coordinatewise and retract arguments prove right flatness, without invoking tensor symmetry or choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources