How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
2 · Summary
Explicit coordinate and power-series rings illustrate regularity and completion. The cusp, split node, and dual numbers distinguish Krull dimension from embedding dimension, while Koszul and periodic resolutions make finite and infinite projective dimension concrete. Under the Axiom of Choice, the finite regular-base example proves the Cohen–Macaulay/freeness criterion, and the final flat map exhibits a singular closed fibre between regular local rings.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Cohen–Macaulayness over a finite regular local base
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an injective finite local map of nonzero Noetherian local rings, with regular. Then is Cohen–Macaulay if and only if it is free as an -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example, including the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring the following are equivalent: is regular; ; ; and every finite -module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, . A nonzero finite module over regular local is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth ) if and only if it is free.
Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an injective integral extension of nonzero commutative rings. Then .
Every system of parameters is regular in a Cohen--Macaulay module: Every system of parameters of a nonzero finite Cohen--Macaulay module over a Noetherian local ring is a regular sequence on that module.
One regular system of parameters implies Cohen--Macaulayness: Let be finite over a Noetherian local ring. If one system of parameters for is -regular, then is Cohen--Macaulay. Here a system of parameters for means a tuple in the maximal ideal, where , such that has finite length.
regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all .
Depth is bounded by support dimension: For every nonzero finite module over a Noetherian local ring , The nonzero hypothesis is essential for this formulation: under the adopted convention , whereas the empty support has no nonnegative Krull dimension.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Verification
Finite injectivity makes the extension integral and gives . Choose a regular system of . The quotient is a finite-dimensional algebra over and a nonzero local ring. Its descending powers of the maximal ideal stabilize as vector subspaces; at stabilization Nakayama makes that power zero. Thus , and the images of the are parameters of .
If is Cohen–Macaulay, those parameters are -regular. Regarded as an -module, consequently has depth at least . The support-dimension bound gives depth at most (its annihilator is zero by injectivity). Homological regularity makes its projective dimension over finite; Auslander–Buchsbaum gives projective dimension zero and freeness.
Conversely, if is free over , the regular parameter sequence of remains injective successively on the finite direct sums describing and its successive quotients. The terminal quotient is nonzero. Since this is a system of parameters of , the regular-parameter criterion makes Cohen–Macaulay. If , the sequence is empty and is a field; all steps remain valid.
fields as regular local rings
Example
Every field is regular local with dimension and embedding dimension zero. Conversely every zero-dimensional regular local ring is a field. Its regular system is empty and its residue field has a free resolution concentrated in degree zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Verification
A field has the single prime and maximal ideal , so its dimension and cotangent dimension are both zero. It is regular by definition. The empty tuple generates its maximal ideal and is its length-zero augmented resolution.
For a zero-dimensional regular local ring, . Nakayama applied to the finite ideal gives . Every element outside the maximal ideal is a unit, so the ring is a field.
dvrs as regular local rings
Example
A DVR with uniformizer and residue field is regular local of dimension one, with regular system and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A DVR in a field , with discrete valuation , uniformizer of value , and residue field .
A DVR is the nonnegative-value ring of a surjective integer-valued valuation; and for . A uniformizer has value (Discrete valuation rings, Discrete valuations, Valuations on a field, Uniformising parameters).
Regular local means that dimension equals cotangent dimension; a minimal maximal-ideal generating tuple of that length is a regular system of parameters (embedding dimension and regular local ring, regular system of parameters). The associated graded ring has degree- piece and multiplication induced from (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration).
Verification
Every nonzero is with , so is a unit. Thus the nonunits form , the unique maximal ideal. In each nonzero ideal, choose an element of least valuation; it divides every element of that ideal and hence generates it. The zero ideal is principal too, so is Noetherian. A nonzero proper prime contains some with , hence contains and equals . Since is a domain and , its only primes are and , giving dimension one. These choices are of one element for a fixed ideal, not of a family.
Since by valuation, the map sending to is bijective: surjectivity is immediate, and cancellation proves injectivity. Thus the cotangent dimension is one, is regular local, and its minimal generating tuple is a regular system of parameters.
For each , the map is well-defined and identifies with , again by cancellation and principality. Multiplication of these classes agrees with polynomial multiplication. Hence the graded map sending to is an isomorphism in every degree, and therefore an isomorphism of graded rings. No choice principle is used.
localised polynomial ring regular
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). For a field and integers , the ring is regular local of dimension , with residue field and regular system .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Verification
A field is regular; polynomial extension and localization make regular. The quotient by the indicated prime inverts every nonzero polynomial in the remaining variables, hence is . The maximal ideal is generated by the first variables.
The strict coordinate chain survives in the localization and has length . The generators bound cotangent dimension by , and the embedding bound gives . Thus those generators are minimal and form regular parameters. If , the ring is the fraction field; if , the residue field is , including .
formal power series ring regular
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). For every field and integer , is a Noetherian regular local ring of dimension , with maximal ideal generated by the variables and residue field .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example, including the Axiom of Choice. This premise supplies the choice hypotheses in the regularity and completion results used in step 2.1.
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Assuming the Axiom of Choice, localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
completion preserves regular local rings: A nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular if and only if its maximal-adic completion is regular.
completion preserves embedding dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , its maximal-adic completion has maximal ideal , residue field , and a canonical isomorphism . In particular their embedding dimensions agree.
Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, and let be its -adic completion. 1. is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal . 2. The residue field is unchanged: 3. The completion map is faithfully flat.
Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finitely generated -module, and let , denote the -adic completions. 1. For every , In particular the Hilbert-Samuel functions of and agree. 2. The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of equals that of . 3. The support dimensions of and are equal.
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Verification
Define a series by coefficients for , with coefficientwise addition and convolution multiplication. For each fixed multi-index only finitely many pairs sum to it, so multiplication is defined and associative by finite reindexing. Compatible truncations in total degrees below , for all , identify this ring with the inverse limit of . In these quotients every polynomial with nonzero constant term has a finite geometric-series inverse, so the same inverse limit is the completion of the coordinate local polynomial ring.
That local polynomial ring is regular: it is a localization of a polynomial ring over a field, and the coordinate prime chain and maximal-ideal generators give dimension . Completion is Noetherian local, preserves dimension and embedding dimension, and preserves regularity. Its maximal ideal is generated by the variable images and its residue field is . For , the index set has one element and the ring is just .
dual numbers not regular
Example
For every field , the dual-number ring is local with and , so is not regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
Verification
Every element has a unique form . It is a unit precisely when , with inverse . Hence the unique maximal ideal is . Every prime contains the nilpotent , so this is the only prime and the dimension is zero.
The square of the maximal ideal is zero and the class of is a nonzero -basis of it. Therefore the cotangent dimension is one, strictly larger than Krull dimension. The ring is finite-dimensional over and hence Noetherian, so the regularity definition applies and fails.
cusp local ring not regular
Example
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, for every field , the cusp local ring has dimension one and embedding dimension two, hence is not regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
embedding dimension and regular local ring: The embedding dimension is the dimension of the cotangent space , and a Noetherian local ring is regular exactly when its dimension equals that embedding dimension.
Verification
The quotient has unique representatives by division by the monic polynomial in . Under , , the two summands have even and odd powers of , respectively; their vanishing forces both to be zero. Hence embeds in and is a domain in every characteristic. The origin ideal remains a proper nonzero maximal ideal after localization.
The ambient local domain has cotangent basis : modulo , every localized polynomial has a unique constant and linear part because its denominator has nonzero constant term. Hence . The chain gives , while [F1] gives .
The kernel of is a nonzero prime by step 1.1. Since is a nonfield local domain, gives . A chain of length two in would lift to a chain of primes of length three in , contradicting step 1.2. Thus . As , the quotient introduces no relation in the cotangent space, so . By [F2], is not regular. The argument works in every characteristic.
betti numbers from a koszul resolution
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
For , the augmented complex is a minimal free resolution. Thus , with all higher Betti numbers zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice and supplies the premises required by [F1]–[F3].
regular local residue field koszul resolution: For a regular local ring of dimension , the Koszul complex on any regular system of parameters is a minimal free resolution of of length .
betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
Verification
The coordinate local ring is regular of dimension two: the coordinate chain and two generators give the dimension. Its variables are regular parameters. The displayed maps are exactly its two-variable Koszul maps; their composition is and the Koszul theorem gives exactness.
Every entry is in , so the resolution is minimal. Its ranks in degrees zero, one, two are and it is zero above two. The rank formula gives the asserted Betti numbers, independently of the characteristic.
residue field infinite projective dimension singular
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field. For , its residue field has an infinite minimal free resolution with one copy of in every degree and every positive differential multiplication by . Consequently for all and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
Verification
The ring is local with maximal ideal . For multiplication by , the image and kernel both equal : . The augmentation has that same kernel. Thus the infinite augmented complex is exact in every degree and all positive matrix entries are in the maximal ideal.
Under the stated AC premise, the rank formula gives in every degree. These nonzero Betti numbers are unbounded in degree, so the projective-dimension criterion gives infinity. A finite initial truncation would have a nonzero left kernel and is not a finite resolution.
embedding dimension versus dimension node
Example
For every field , the split node is reduced and has dimension one and embedding dimension two. It is neither a domain nor regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field and split-node ring in the example. The dimension and cotangent-space calculations below are direct.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
Verification
In , , as divisibility of monomials shows. It is therefore radical. Every prime of the quotient contains or ; in the origin localization either branch is the local line , with prime chain of length one. Thus is reduced of dimension one. Both and survive and their product is zero, so it is not a domain.
The relation is quadratic, so has independent basis . Its dimension two strictly exceeds the dimension one just computed, and the definition makes nonregular. Localization does not change these cotangent classes since denominators have nonzero constant term. This works also in characteristic two.
associated graded polynomial map singular kernel
Example
For the cusp local ring with maximal ideal , the associated graded ring is . Thus the polynomial map defined by the cotangent classes has kernel exactly .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the coordinate local ring with maximal ideal , and its quotient with maximal ideal .
The associated graded ring is the direct sum of the successive ideal-power quotients, with multiplication induced by the ring (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration).
Verification
In the ambient coordinate local ring , the associated graded ring is : a rational function with denominator of nonzero constant term has initial form equal to its numerator initial form divided by that constant. This identifies each graded piece and respects products. Therefore orders add on products of nonzero elements of . In particular for , , and for every nonzero .
The quotient map sends onto for each , so by [F1] it induces a surjection . Its degree- kernel consists of classes of with . Write with . If its degree- class is nonzero, it is exactly the initial form of , hence a multiple of . Conversely every homogeneous multiple of is the initial form of a polynomial multiple of . Thus the graded kernel is exactly , proving the displayed quotient directly. Since , the cotangent classes of form its degree-one basis, and the induced map is the claimed polynomial map.
minimal resolution unit cancellation
Example
Over , the free resolution , with augmentation , contracts to the minimal resolution .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
minimal free resolution differentials land in maximal ideal: For an augmented degreewise finite free resolution over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , minimality means that every positive differential matrix has entries in . Equivalently no positive differential admits a unit pivot, or a nonzero two-term identity direct summand. A unit pivot can be cancelled without changing the resolved module.
Verification
The displayed diagonal map is injective since is a domain. Its image consists exactly of pairs whose first coordinate lies in , which is the augmentation kernel. Hence the complex is exact.
The second coordinates form the two-term identity summand, whose identity homotopy contracts it. Removing it leaves multiplication by on the first coordinates. Since belongs to the maximal ideal, this remaining resolution is minimal by the unit-cancellation criterion.
betti numbers residue field regular ring
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For , the residue field has Betti numbers and projective dimension three.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example, including the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice); cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local residue field koszul resolution: For a regular local ring of dimension , the Koszul complex on any regular system of parameters is a minimal free resolution of of length .
betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, for all .
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring of dimension , and for , with for .
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Verification
The coordinate chain of prime ideals gives dimension at least three, while the three generators of the maximal ideal give embedding dimension at most three and hence dimension at most three. Thus is regular of dimension three with parameters . Their Koszul complex is a minimal resolution.
The exterior bases have ranks in degrees zero through three and zero above. The rank and projective-dimension formulas give these Betti numbers and projective dimension three, since the top rank is one.
auslander buchsbaum first syzygy
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
For with maximal ideal , , , and its first syzygy satisfies and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension: Let be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If , then and .
auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring , . Consequently such an with is free.
regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring of dimension , and for , with for .
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
Verification
The ring is regular local of dimension two, by polynomial regularity and the coordinate chain and generator count. The residue-field computation gives projective dimension two. Its depth is zero because every maximal-ideal element kills the nonzero module . The presentation is minimal.
The syzygy theorem gives . The ring depth is two, since is a regular sequence and depth is bounded by dimension. Auslander–Buchsbaum gives . Concretely its minimal resolution is : reducing a relation modulo shows , and then cancellation gives .
completion regularity invariance
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The ring and its completion both have dimension and embedding dimension two. For every , their quotients by the th powers of the maximal ideals agree and have basis the monomials of total degree less than .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
completion preserves embedding dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring , its maximal-adic completion has maximal ideal , residue field , and a canonical isomorphism . In particular their embedding dimensions agree.
completion preserves regular local rings: A nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular if and only if its maximal-adic completion is regular.
Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, and let be its -adic completion. 1. is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal . 2. The residue field is unchanged: 3. The completion map is faithfully flat.
Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finitely generated -module, and let , denote the -adic completions. 1. For every , In particular the Hilbert-Samuel functions of and agree. 2. The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of equals that of . 3. The support dimensions of and are equal.
dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring satisfies .
Verification
Degree truncation identifies series modulo with polynomials modulo that ideal. In the truncated polynomial ring, every denominator allowed in is a unit, by a finite geometric-series expansion of its nonconstant part. Thus both quotients have the stated monomial basis, and their inverse limit is , identifying it as the maximal-adic completion.
The coordinate chain and two maximal-ideal generators give . The cotangent-completion theorem preserves embedding dimension and the completion dimension theorem preserves dimension independently. The completion is Noetherian local and regular. At the quotient is ; at the basis exhibits the two cotangent classes.
hypersurface regularity at a rational point
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be any field, , and with . The local hypersurface ring at is regular if and only if at least one formal partial derivative is nonzero at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element: Let be nonzero Noetherian local. If is a nonzerodivisor and is regular, then is regular and . For every nonzerodivisor , . If is regular and , then is regular if and only if .
Verification
Translate coordinates . The ambient local ring is regular, with cotangent basis the . It is a domain, so the nonzero polynomial is a nonzerodivisor. The quotient regularity criterion says is regular exactly when . The hypotheses cannot hold for n=0, because then f is a nonzero constant.
Monomial expansion after translation gives ; the constant term vanishes. Independence of the cotangent basis makes this class nonzero precisely when at least one coefficient is nonzero. This proves both implications over every characteristic. It is a rational-point hypersurface statement and makes no assertion about smoothness over arbitrary residue-field extensions.
regular local ambient cover minimal dimension
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). If a nonzero Noetherian local ring is a quotient of at least one regular local ring, then the least dimension of a regular local ring surjecting onto is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Under AC, quotienting a regular local ring by an element of a cotangent basis gives a regular local ring of dimension one less.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: Embedding dimension is the dimension of the cotangent vector space, and in a regular local ring it equals ring dimension.
Verification
For a surjection of local rings the maximal ideal of is and the residue fields agree. Thus its cotangent space is the quotient . If is regular of dimension , [F2] gives .
For a supplied regular cover put . Lift a basis of this subspace to and extend their cotangent classes to a basis of . Under AC, apply [F1] successively to these basis members; after each quotient the remaining classes are a cotangent basis. The resulting ring is regular of dimension by the cotangent quotient calculation of step 1.1. It still surjects onto , so the lower bound is attained. If retain the original cover; if the new cover is the residue field.
regular flat local map with singular closed fibre
Example
For every field , the local map , , is finite free of rank two between regular DVRs. Its closed fibre is and is not regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring , define . The ring is regular local when . The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because is finitely generated.
Verification
Before localization every polynomial in has a unique expression , so is free on over . After localizing the base at , call the resulting rank-two free algebra . If has nonzero constant term, write . Then is a unit of the base, since its constant term is . Thus every such is a unit of , proving , also in characteristic two.
The source and target are regular one-dimensional coordinate local rings (their elements are units times powers of their variable, giving DVRs). The maximal ideal contracts correctly, and freeness makes the map flat. Modulo the source maximal ideal the fibre is , whose only prime is , with zero square and one-dimensional cotangent space. Its Krull dimension is zero, so it is singular by the regularity definition.
Sources
- Exercise 12.41, p.125
- Corollary 1.63, p.27
- Example 12.6, p.115
- Example 12.10, p.116
- Example 12.37, p.124
- Lecture 25, Example 25.1 and completion properties (1),(5),(6), pp.68–69
- Definitions 12.3–12.5 and Example 12.6, p.115
- Lecture 25, Propositions 25.6–25.8, pp.67–68
- Theorem 12.33 proof, p.123
- Proposition 12.27 and Corollary 12.29, p.121
- Lecture 25, Proposition 25.6 and its graded-map proof, p.67
- §12.2 minimal-resolution construction and Remark 12.28, pp.120–121
- Theorem 12.33, p.123
- Theorem 12.31 and Theorem 12.33, pp.121–123
- Lecture 25, Example 25.1 and property (6), pp.68–69
- Exercise 12.17, p.117; rational-point calculation removes the unnecessary algebraic-closure hypothesis
- Exercise 12.18, p.117
- Exercise 12.40(iii), pp.124–125