Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Explicit coordinate and power-series rings illustrate regularity and completion. The cusp, split node, and dual numbers distinguish Krull dimension from embedding dimension, while Koszul and periodic resolutions make finite and infinite projective dimension concrete. Under the Axiom of Choice, the finite regular-base example proves the Cohen–Macaulay/freeness criterion, and the final flat map exhibits a singular closed fibre between regular local rings.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Cohen–Macaulayness over a finite regular local base

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A↪B be an injective finite local map of nonzero Noetherian local rings, with A regular. Then B is Cohen–Macaulay if and only if it is free as an A-module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example, including the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module M of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring R, pd⁡RM+depth⁡RM=depth⁡R. Consequently such an M with depth⁡M=depth⁡R is free.

[F2]

auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m,k) the following are equivalent: R is regular; pd⁡Rk<∞; gldim⁡R<∞; and every finite R-module has finite projective dimension. When these hold, gldim⁡R=pd⁡Rk=dim⁡R. A nonzero finite module over regular local R is maximal Cohen–Macaulay (depth dim⁡R) if and only if it is free.

[F3]

Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A⊆B be an injective integral extension of nonzero commutative rings. Then dim⁡A=dim⁡B.

[F4]

Every system of parameters is regular in a Cohen--Macaulay module: Every system of parameters of a nonzero finite Cohen--Macaulay module over a Noetherian local ring is a regular sequence on that module.

[F5]

One regular system of parameters implies Cohen--Macaulayness: Let 0≠M be finite over a Noetherian local ring. If one system of parameters for M is M-regular, then M is Cohen--Macaulay. Here a system of parameters for M means a tuple x1,…,xd in the maximal ideal, where d=dim⁡Supp⁡R(M), such that M/(x1,…,xd)M has finite length.

[F6]

regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: A regular local ring R of dimension d is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system (x1,…,xd), the tuple is R-regular and R/(x1,…,xc) is regular local of dimension d−c for all 0≤c≤d.

[F7]

Depth is bounded by support dimension: For every nonzero finite module M over a Noetherian local ring R, 0≤depth⁡R(M)≤dim⁡Supp⁡R(M). The nonzero hypothesis is essential for this formulation: under the adopted convention depth⁡R(0)=+∞, whereas the empty support has no nonnegative Krull dimension.

[F8]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a commutative ring, let I⊴R satisfy I⊆J(R), and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If IM=M, then M=0.

Verification

1.1F3F6F8

Finite injectivity makes the extension integral and gives d=dim⁡A=dim⁡B. Choose a regular system x1,…,xd of A. The quotient C=B/mAB is a finite-dimensional algebra over kA and a nonzero local ring. Its descending powers of the maximal ideal stabilize as vector subspaces; at stabilization Nakayama makes that power zero. Thus mAB=mB, and the images of the xi are parameters of B.

2.1F4F7F2F1step 1.1

If B is Cohen–Macaulay, those parameters are B-regular. Regarded as an A-module, B consequently has depth at least d. The support-dimension bound gives depth at most d (its annihilator is zero by injectivity). Homological regularity makes its projective dimension over A finite; Auslander–Buchsbaum gives projective dimension zero and freeness.

3.1F6F5step 1.1∎

Conversely, if B is free over A, the regular parameter sequence of A remains injective successively on the finite direct sums describing B and its successive quotients. The terminal quotient is nonzero. Since this is a system of parameters of B, the regular-parameter criterion makes B Cohen–Macaulay. If d=0, the sequence is empty and A is a field; all steps remain valid.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

fields as regular local rings

Example

Every field k is regular local with dimension and embedding dimension zero. Conversely every zero-dimensional regular local ring is a field. Its regular system is empty and its residue field has a free resolution concentrated in degree zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), define edim⁡R=dim⁡k(m/m2). The ring is regular local when edim⁡R=dim⁡R. The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because m is finitely generated.

[F2]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a commutative ring, let I⊴R satisfy I⊆J(R), and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If IM=M, then M=0.

Verification

1.1F1algebra

A field has the single prime and maximal ideal (0), so its dimension and cotangent dimension are both zero. It is regular by definition. The empty tuple generates its maximal ideal and k→1k is its length-zero augmented resolution.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

For a zero-dimensional regular local ring, m/m2=0. Nakayama applied to the finite ideal m gives m=0. Every element outside the maximal ideal is a unit, so the ring is a field.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

dvrs as regular local rings

Example

A DVR R with uniformizer t and residue field k is regular local of dimension one, with regular system (t) and gr⁡(t)R≅k[T].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A DVR R={a∈K:v(a)≥0} in a field K, with discrete valuation v, uniformizer t of value 1, and residue field k.

[F1]

A DVR is the nonnegative-value ring of a surjective integer-valued valuation; v(ab)=v(a)+v(b) and v(a−1)=−v(a) for a≠0. A uniformizer has value 1 (Discrete valuation rings, Discrete valuations, Valuations on a field, Uniformising parameters).

[F2]

Regular local means that dimension equals cotangent dimension; a minimal maximal-ideal generating tuple of that length is a regular system of parameters (embedding dimension and regular local ring, regular system of parameters). The associated graded ring has degree-n piece (tn)/(tn+1) and multiplication induced from R (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration).

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

Every nonzero a∈R is tv(a)u with v(u)=0, so u is a unit. Thus the nonunits form (t), the unique maximal ideal. In each nonzero ideal, choose an element of least valuation; it divides every element of that ideal and hence generates it. The zero ideal is principal too, so R is Noetherian. A nonzero proper prime contains some tnu with n≥1, hence contains t and equals (t). Since R⊆K is a domain and (t)≠0, its only primes are (0) and (t), giving dimension one. These choices are of one element for a fixed ideal, not of a family.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Since t∉(t2) by valuation, the map k=R/(t)→(t)/(t2) sending a+(t) to at+(t2) is bijective: surjectivity is immediate, and cancellation proves injectivity. Thus the cotangent dimension is one, R is regular local, and its minimal generating tuple (t) is a regular system of parameters.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For each n≥0, the map a+(t)↦atn+(tn+1) is well-defined and identifies k with (tn)/(tn+1), again by cancellation and principality. Multiplication of these classes agrees with polynomial multiplication. Hence the graded map k[T]→gr⁡(t)R sending T to t+(t2) is an isomorphism in every degree, and therefore an isomorphism of graded rings. No choice principle is used.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

localised polynomial ring regular

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). For a field k and integers 0≤r≤n, the ring R=k[x1,…,xn](x1,…,xr) is regular local of dimension r, with residue field k(xr+1,…,xn) and regular system (x1,…,xr).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, gldim⁡R=dim⁡R, allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.

[F2]

dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring R satisfies dim⁡R≤edim⁡R<∞.

Verification

1.1F1algebra

A field is regular; polynomial extension and localization make R regular. The quotient by the indicated prime inverts every nonzero polynomial in the remaining variables, hence is k(xr+1,…,xn). The maximal ideal is generated by the first r variables.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The strict coordinate chain (0)⊊(x1)⊊⋯⊊(x1,…,xr) survives in the localization and has length r. The r generators bound cotangent dimension by r, and the embedding bound gives r≤dim⁡R≤edim⁡R≤r. Thus those generators are minimal and form regular parameters. If r=0, the ring is the fraction field; if r=n, the residue field is k, including n=r=0.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

formal power series ring regular

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). For every field k and integer n≥0, k[ ⁣[x1,…,xn] ⁣] is a Noetherian regular local ring of dimension n, with maximal ideal generated by the variables and residue field k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example, including the Axiom of Choice. This premise supplies the choice hypotheses in the regularity and completion results used in step 2.1.

[F1]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Assuming the Axiom of Choice, localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, gldim⁡R=dim⁡R, allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.

[F2]

completion preserves regular local rings: A nonzero Noetherian local ring R is regular if and only if its maximal-adic completion R^ is regular.

[F3]

completion preserves embedding dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), its maximal-adic completion R^ has maximal ideal m^=mR^, residue field k, and a canonical isomorphism m/m2≅m^/m^2. In particular their embedding dimensions agree.

[F4]

Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, and let R^ be its m-adic completion. 1. R^ is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal mR^. 2. The residue field is unchanged: R^/mR^≅R/m. 3. The completion map R→R^ is faithfully flat.

[F5]

Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, let M≠0 be a finitely generated R-module, and let R^, M^ denote the m-adic completions. 1. For every n≥0, M^/mn+1M^≅M/mn+1M. In particular the Hilbert-Samuel functions of M and M^ agree. 2. The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of M equals that of M^. 3. The support dimensions of M and M^ are equal.

[F6]

dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring R satisfies dim⁡R≤edim⁡R<∞.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Define a series by coefficients aα∈k for α∈Nn, with coefficientwise addition and convolution multiplication. For each fixed multi-index only finitely many pairs sum to it, so multiplication is defined and associative by finite reindexing. Compatible truncations in total degrees below q, for all q≥1, identify this ring with the inverse limit of k[x1,…,xn]/(x1,…,xn)q. In these quotients every polynomial with nonzero constant term has a finite geometric-series inverse, so the same inverse limit is the completion of the coordinate local polynomial ring.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1∎

That local polynomial ring is regular: it is a localization of a polynomial ring over a field, and the coordinate prime chain and n maximal-ideal generators give dimension n. Completion is Noetherian local, preserves dimension and embedding dimension, and preserves regularity. Its maximal ideal is generated by the variable images and its residue field is k. For n=0, the index set N0 has one element and the ring is just k.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

dual numbers not regular

Example

For every field k, the dual-number ring R=k[ε]/(ε2) is local with dim⁡R=0 and edim⁡R=1, so is not regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), define edim⁡R=dim⁡k(m/m2). The ring is regular local when edim⁡R=dim⁡R. The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because m is finitely generated.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Every element has a unique form a+bε. It is a unit precisely when a≠0, with inverse a−1−ba−2ε. Hence the unique maximal ideal is (ε). Every prime contains the nilpotent ε, so this is the only prime and the dimension is zero.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The square of the maximal ideal is zero and the class of ε is a nonzero k-basis of it. Therefore the cotangent dimension is one, strictly larger than Krull dimension. The ring is finite-dimensional over k and hence Noetherian, so the regularity definition applies and fails.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

cusp local ring not regular

Example

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, for every field k, the cusp local ring R=(k[x,y]/(y2−x3))(x,y) has dimension one and embedding dimension two, hence is not regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring T satisfies dim⁡T≤edim⁡T<∞.

[F2]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: The embedding dimension is the dimension of the cotangent space m/m2, and a Noetherian local ring is regular exactly when its dimension equals that embedding dimension.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

The quotient A=k[x,y]/(y2−x3) has unique representatives a(x)+yb(x) by division by the monic polynomial in y. Under x↦t2, y↦t3, the two summands have even and odd powers of t, respectively; their vanishing forces both to be zero. Hence A embeds in k[t] and is a domain in every characteristic. The origin ideal remains a proper nonzero maximal ideal after localization.

1.2F1F2algebra

The ambient local domain S=k[x,y](x,y) has cotangent basis x,y: modulo (x,y)2, every localized polynomial has a unique constant and linear part because its denominator has nonzero constant term. Hence edim⁡S=2. The chain (0)⊊(x)S⊊(x,y)S gives dim⁡S≥2, while [F1] gives dim⁡S≤2.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The kernel (f)S of S→R is a nonzero prime by step 1.1. Since R is a nonfield local domain, (0)⊊(x,y)R gives dim⁡R≥1. A chain of length two in R would lift to a chain of primes (0)⊊(f)S⊊p⊊(x,y)S of length three in S, contradicting step 1.2. Thus dim⁡R=1. As f∈(x,y)2S, the quotient introduces no relation in the cotangent space, so edim⁡R=2. By [F2], R is not regular. The argument works in every characteristic.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

betti numbers from a koszul resolution

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

For R=k[x,y](x,y), the augmented complex 0→R→c↦(−yc,xc)R2→(a,b)↦xa+ybR→k→0 is a minimal free resolution. Thus β(k)=(1,2,1), with all higher Betti numbers zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice and supplies the premises required by [F1]–[F3].

[F1]

regular local residue field koszul resolution: For a regular local ring (R,m,k) of dimension d, the Koszul complex on any regular system of parameters is a minimal free resolution of k of length d.

[F2]

betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution F∙→M of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, βiR(M)=rank⁡RFi for all i≥0.

[F3]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, gldim⁡R=dim⁡R, allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.

Verification

1.1F3F1algebra

The coordinate local ring is regular of dimension two: the coordinate chain and two generators give the dimension. Its variables are regular parameters. The displayed maps are exactly its two-variable Koszul maps; their composition is −xyc+yxc=0 and the Koszul theorem gives exactness.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Every entry is in (x,y), so the resolution is minimal. Its ranks in degrees zero, one, two are 1,2,1 and it is zero above two. The rank formula gives the asserted Betti numbers, independently of the characteristic.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

residue field infinite projective dimension singular

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field. For R=k[ε]/(ε2), its residue field k has an infinite minimal free resolution with one copy of R in every degree and every positive differential multiplication by ε. Consequently βiR(k)=1 for all i≥0 and pd⁡Rk=∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module M over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, pd⁡RM=sup⁡{i≥0:βiR(M)≠0}, allowing infinity. For each integer q≥0, pd⁡RM≤q if and only if Tor⁡q+1R(k,M)=0.

[F2]

betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution F∙→M of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, βiR(M)=rank⁡RFi for all i≥0.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

The ring is local with maximal ideal (ε). For multiplication by ε, the image and kernel both equal (ε): ε(a+bε)=aε. The augmentation R→k has that same kernel. Thus the infinite augmented complex is exact in every degree and all positive matrix entries are in the maximal ideal.

2.1givenF2F1step 1.1∎

Under the stated AC premise, the rank formula gives βi(k)=1 in every degree. These nonzero Betti numbers are unbounded in degree, so the projective-dimension criterion gives infinity. A finite initial truncation would have a nonzero left kernel and is not a finite resolution.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

embedding dimension versus dimension node

Example

For every field k, the split node R=(k[x,y]/(xy))(x,y) is reduced and has dimension one and embedding dimension two. It is neither a domain nor regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field and split-node ring in the example. The dimension and cotangent-space calculations below are direct.

[F2]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), define edim⁡R=dim⁡k(m/m2). The ring is regular local when edim⁡R=dim⁡R. The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because m is finitely generated.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

In k[x,y], (xy)=(x)∩(y), as divisibility of monomials shows. It is therefore radical. Every prime of the quotient contains x or y; in the origin localization either branch is the local line k[t](t), with prime chain of length one. Thus R is reduced of dimension one. Both x and y survive and their product is zero, so it is not a domain.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The relation xy is quadratic, so m/m2 has independent basis xˉ,yˉ. Its dimension two strictly exceeds the dimension one just computed, and the definition makes R nonregular. Localization does not change these cotangent classes since denominators have nonzero constant term. This works also in characteristic two.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

associated graded polynomial map singular kernel

Example

For the cusp local ring R=(k[x,y]/(y2−x3))(x,y) with maximal ideal m, the associated graded ring is k[X,Y]/(Y2). Thus the polynomial map defined by the cotangent classes has kernel exactly (Y2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the coordinate local ring S=k[x,y](x,y) with maximal ideal n, and its quotient R=S/(y2−x3) with maximal ideal m.

[F1]

The associated graded ring is the direct sum of the successive ideal-power quotients, with multiplication induced by the ring (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration).

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

In the ambient coordinate local ring S=k[x,y](x,y), the associated graded ring is k[X,Y]: a rational function with denominator of nonzero constant term has initial form equal to its numerator initial form divided by that constant. This identifies each graded piece and respects products. Therefore orders add on products of nonzero elements of S. In particular for f=y2−x3, in⁡(f)=Y2, and in⁡(hf)=in⁡(h)Y2 for every nonzero h∈S.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The quotient map S→R sends nn onto mn for each n, so by [F1] it induces a surjection gr⁡nS↠gr⁡mR. Its degree-n kernel consists of classes of a∈nn with a∈(f)+nn+1. Write a=hf+b with b∈nn+1. If its degree-n class is nonzero, it is exactly the initial form of hf, hence a multiple of Y2. Conversely every homogeneous multiple of Y2 is the initial form of a polynomial multiple of f. Thus the graded kernel is exactly (Y2), proving the displayed quotient directly. Since f∈n2, the cotangent classes of x,y form its degree-one basis, and the induced map is the claimed polynomial map.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

minimal resolution unit cancellation

Example

Over R=k[x](x), the free resolution 0→R2→diag⁡(x,1)R2→R/(x)→0, with augmentation (a,b)↦a mod x, contracts to the minimal resolution 0→R→xR→R/(x)→0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

minimal free resolution differentials land in maximal ideal: For an augmented degreewise finite free resolution over a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m), minimality means that every positive differential matrix has entries in m. Equivalently no positive differential admits a unit pivot, or a nonzero two-term identity direct summand. A unit pivot can be cancelled without changing the resolved module.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

The displayed diagonal map is injective since R is a domain. Its image consists exactly of pairs whose first coordinate lies in (x), which is the augmentation kernel. Hence the complex is exact.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

The second coordinates form the two-term identity summand, whose identity homotopy contracts it. Removing it leaves multiplication by x on the first coordinates. Since x belongs to the maximal ideal, this remaining resolution is minimal by the unit-cancellation criterion.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

betti numbers residue field regular ring

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For R=k[x,y,z](x,y,z), the residue field has Betti numbers (1,3,3,1) and projective dimension three.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example, including the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice); cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

regular local residue field koszul resolution: For a regular local ring (R,m,k) of dimension d, the Koszul complex on any regular system of parameters is a minimal free resolution of k of length d.

[F2]

betti number is rank in minimal resolution: For every minimal degreewise finite free resolution F∙→M of a finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, βiR(M)=rank⁡RFi for all i≥0.

[F3]

regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring (R,m,k) of dimension d, pd⁡Rk=d and βiR(k)=(di) for 0≤i≤d, with βiR(k)=0 for i>d.

[F4]

dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring R satisfies dim⁡R≤edim⁡R<∞.

Verification

1.1F1F4algebra

The coordinate chain of prime ideals gives dimension at least three, while the three generators of the maximal ideal give embedding dimension at most three and hence dimension at most three. Thus R is regular of dimension three with parameters x,y,z. Their Koszul complex is a minimal resolution.

2.1F2F3step 1.1∎

The exterior bases have ranks 1,3,3,1 in degrees zero through three and zero above. The rank and projective-dimension formulas give these Betti numbers and projective dimension three, since the top rank is one.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-astra)Open item page →

auslander buchsbaum first syzygy

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

For R=k[x,y](x,y) with maximal ideal m, pd⁡Rk=2, depth⁡Rk=0, and its first syzygy satisfies pd⁡Rm=1 and depth⁡Rm=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension: Let 0→K→F0→M→0 be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If 0<n=pd⁡M<∞, then K≠0 and pd⁡K=n−1.

[F2]

auslander buchsbaum formula: For a nonzero finite module M of finite projective dimension over a nonzero Noetherian local ring R, pd⁡RM+depth⁡RM=depth⁡R. Consequently such an M with depth⁡M=depth⁡R is free.

[F3]

regular local residue field projective dimension dimension: For a regular local ring (R,m,k) of dimension d, pd⁡Rk=d and βiR(k)=(di) for 0≤i≤d, with βiR(k)=0 for i>d.

[F4]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, gldim⁡R=dim⁡R, allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.

Verification

1.1F4F3algebra

The ring is regular local of dimension two, by polynomial regularity and the coordinate chain and generator count. The residue-field computation gives projective dimension two. Its depth is zero because every maximal-ideal element kills the nonzero module k. The presentation 0→m→R→k→0 is minimal.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The syzygy theorem gives pd⁡m=1. The ring depth is two, since x,y is a regular sequence and depth is bounded by dimension. Auslander–Buchsbaum gives depth⁡m=2−1=1. Concretely its minimal resolution is 0→R→c↦(−yc,xc)R2→m→0: reducing a relation modulo x shows b=xc, and then cancellation gives a=−yc.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

completion regularity invariance

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The ring R=k[x,y](x,y) and its completion k[ ⁣[x,y] ⁣] both have dimension and embedding dimension two. For every q≥1, their quotients by the qth powers of the maximal ideals agree and have basis the monomials of total degree less than q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

completion preserves embedding dimension: For a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), its maximal-adic completion R^ has maximal ideal m^=mR^, residue field k, and a canonical isomorphism m/m2≅m^/m^2. In particular their embedding dimensions agree.

[F2]

completion preserves regular local rings: A nonzero Noetherian local ring R is regular if and only if its maximal-adic completion R^ is regular.

[F3]

Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, and let R^ be its m-adic completion. 1. R^ is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal mR^. 2. The residue field is unchanged: R^/mR^≅R/m. 3. The completion map R→R^ is faithfully flat.

[F4]

Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, let M≠0 be a finitely generated R-module, and let R^, M^ denote the m-adic completions. 1. For every n≥0, M^/mn+1M^≅M/mn+1M. In particular the Hilbert-Samuel functions of M and M^ agree. 2. The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of M equals that of M^. 3. The support dimensions of M and M^ are equal.

[F5]

dimension at most embedding dimension: Every nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring R satisfies dim⁡R≤edim⁡R<∞.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Degree truncation identifies series modulo (x,y)q with polynomials modulo that ideal. In the truncated polynomial ring, every denominator allowed in R is a unit, by a finite geometric-series expansion of its nonconstant part. Thus both quotients have the stated monomial basis, and their inverse limit is k[ ⁣[x,y] ⁣], identifying it as the maximal-adic completion.

2.1F1F4F3F2F5step 1.1∎

The coordinate chain and two maximal-ideal generators give dim⁡R=edim⁡R=2. The cotangent-completion theorem preserves embedding dimension and the completion dimension theorem preserves dimension independently. The completion is Noetherian local and regular. At q=1 the quotient is k; at q=2 the basis 1,x,y exhibits the two cotangent classes.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

hypersurface regularity at a rational point

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be any field, a∈kn, and 0≠f∈k[x1,…,xn] with f(a)=0. The local hypersurface ring at a is regular if and only if at least one formal partial derivative ∂f/∂xi is nonzero at a.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, gldim⁡R=dim⁡R, allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.

[F2]

quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element: Let (R,m) be nonzero Noetherian local. If x∈m is a nonzerodivisor and R/(x) is regular, then R is regular and x∉m2. For every nonzerodivisor x∈m, dim⁡(R/(x))=dim⁡R−1. If R is regular and 0≠x∈m, then R/(x) is regular if and only if x∉m2.

Verification

1.1F1F2

Translate coordinates ui=xi−ai. The ambient local ring S=k[u1,…,un](u1,…,un) is regular, with cotangent basis the ui. It is a domain, so the nonzero polynomial f is a nonzerodivisor. The quotient regularity criterion says S/(f) is regular exactly when f∉mS2. The hypotheses cannot hold for n=0, because then f is a nonzero constant.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Monomial expansion after translation gives f≡∑i(∂f/∂xi)(a)ui(modmS2); the constant term vanishes. Independence of the cotangent basis makes this class nonzero precisely when at least one coefficient is nonzero. This proves both implications over every characteristic. It is a rational-point hypersurface statement and makes no assertion about smoothness over arbitrary residue-field extensions.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

regular local ambient cover minimal dimension

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). If a nonzero Noetherian local ring A is a quotient of at least one regular local ring, then the least dimension of a regular local ring surjecting onto A is edim⁡A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Under AC, quotienting a regular local ring by an element of a cotangent basis gives a regular local ring of dimension one less.

[F2]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: Embedding dimension is the dimension of the cotangent vector space, and in a regular local ring it equals ring dimension.

Verification

1.1F2algebra

For a surjection R→A=R/I of local rings the maximal ideal of A is mR/I and the residue fields agree. Thus its cotangent space is the quotient mR/(I+mR2). If R is regular of dimension d, [F2] gives edim⁡A≤d.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

For a supplied regular cover put c=dim⁡k((I+mR2)/mR2). Lift a basis of this subspace to x1,…,xc∈I and extend their cotangent classes to a basis of mR/mR2. Under AC, apply [F1] successively to these c basis members; after each quotient the remaining classes are a cotangent basis. The resulting ring R/(x1,…,xc) is regular of dimension d−c=edim⁡A by the cotangent quotient calculation of step 1.1. It still surjects onto A, so the lower bound is attained. If c=0 retain the original cover; if c=d the new cover is the residue field.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

regular flat local map with singular closed fibre

Example

For every field k, the local map k[s](s)→k[t](t), s↦t2, is finite free of rank two between regular DVRs. Its closed fibre is k[t]/(t2) and is not regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[F1]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: For a nonzero commutative Noetherian local ring (R,m,k), define edim⁡R=dim⁡k(m/m2). The ring is regular local when edim⁡R=dim⁡R. The cotangent space is intrinsic, and is finite-dimensional because m is finitely generated.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Before localization every polynomial in t has a unique expression a(t2)+tb(t2), so k[t] is free on 1,t over k[s]. After localizing the base at (s), call the resulting rank-two free algebra C. If h(t) has nonzero constant term, write h=a(s)+tb(s). Then (a+tb)(a−tb)=a(s)2−sb(s)2 is a unit of the base, since its constant term is a(0)2≠0. Thus every such h is a unit of C, proving C=k[t](t), also in characteristic two.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The source and target are regular one-dimensional coordinate local rings (their elements are units times powers of their variable, giving DVRs). The maximal ideal contracts correctly, and freeness makes the map flat. Modulo the source maximal ideal the fibre is k[t]/(t2), whose only prime is (t), with zero square and one-dimensional cotangent space. Its Krull dimension is zero, so it is singular by the regularity definition.

Sources