How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
hypersurface regularity at a rational point
Example
Let be any field, , and with . The local hypersurface ring at is regular if and only if at least one formal partial derivative is nonzero at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, , allowing infinity. More generally, for a finite module over any commutative Noetherian ring, projective dimension is the supremum of its prime-local projective dimensions. Dedekind domains and their finite polynomial extensions are regular.
quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element: Let be nonzero Noetherian local. If is a nonzerodivisor and is regular, then is regular and . For every nonzerodivisor , . If is regular and , then is regular if and only if .
Verification
Translate coordinates . The ambient local ring is regular, with cotangent basis the . It is a domain, so the nonzero polynomial is a nonzerodivisor. The quotient regularity criterion says is regular exactly when . The hypotheses cannot hold for n=0, because then f is a nonzero constant.
Monomial expansion after translation gives ; the constant term vanishes. Independence of the cotangent basis makes this class nonzero precisely when at least one coefficient is nonzero. This proves both implications over every characteristic. It is a rational-point hypersurface statement and makes no assertion about smoothness over arbitrary residue-field extensions.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Exercise 12.17, p.117; rational-point calculation removes the unnecessary algebraic-closure hypothesis (standard reference, not scraped)