How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Module categories have enough injectives
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every unital ring and every left -module , there is an injective left -module and a monomorphism . Thus left -modules have enough injectives.
For commutative , one explicit functorial target is where ; the embedding is . Here is a left -module by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital ring and a left -module .
Every abelian group embeds, without choice, in a divisible abelian group (Every abelian group embeds in a divisible abelian group).
If is an injective abelian group, then is an injective left -module (Coinduction sends injective abelian groups to injective modules).
Under AC, products of injective modules are injective (Products of injective modules are injective, with the exact choice boundary).
The free module on a set has its universal property and canonical basis (Universal property of the free module on a set).
Under AC, divisible abelian groups are injective -modules (Over a PID, injective modules are exactly divisible modules).
AC supplies choices for arbitrary nonempty families (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Regard as an abelian group. By [L1], choose an embedding into a divisible abelian group . Under AC, [L5] makes injective as an abelian group.
Now assume commutative and put . This group is divisible, hence injective by [L5]. For every nonzero , define a nonzero map on the cyclic subgroup by sending to when has finite order , or to when has infinite order; injectivity extends it to . Therefore evaluation is injective.
Define by . It is -linear for the coinduced action, and evaluation at gives , so is injective.
Let be the canonical free cover given by [L4]. Precomposition with its surjection embeds into .
The target in step 2.1 is injective by [L2], proving enough injectives for arbitrary unital rings.
A homomorphism from a direct sum to is the same as a family of homomorphisms from its summands, so . Each is injective by [L2], and the product is injective by [L3].
A module map induces , then a map between the canonical free modules, and dualizing reverses direction again; these maps commute with evaluation and the free covers, so and the embeddings are functorial.
Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 prove enough injectives over every unital ring. Steps 1.2, 2.2, 3.2, and 4.1 give the stated functorial commutative-ring construction. Full AC enters through injectivity of divisible groups and arbitrary products, not through the divisible-hull embedding itself.
Depends on
- Every abelian group embeds in a divisible abelian group
- Coinduction sends injective abelian groups to injective modules
- Products of injective modules are injective, with the exact choice boundary
- Universal property of the free module on a set
- Over a PID, injective modules are exactly divisible modules
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 39 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)